Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Association Between Preconception Care Receipt and the Timeliness and Adequacy of Prenatal Care: An Examination of Multistate Data from Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2009–2011

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives Prenatal care (PNC) is a critical preventive health service for pregnant women and infants. While timely PNC has been associated with improved birth outcomes, improvements have slowed since the late 1990s. Therefore, focus has shifted to interventions prior to pregnancy. Preconception care is recommended for all women of reproductive age. This study aimed to examine preconception care and its association with timeliness and adequacy of PNC. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from a large sample of United States first-time mothers (n = 13,509) who participated in the 2009–2011 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in ten states. Timeliness and adequacy of PNC data came from birth certificates, while preconception care receipt was self-reported. Logistic regression provided odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to model the association between preconception care receipt and the two PNC outcomes. Results After adjustment, women who received preconception care had statistically significant increased odds of timely (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.08, 1.57), but not adequate PNC (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94, 1.24) as compared to women who did not receive preconception care. Pregnancy intention modified these associations. Associations were strongest among women with intended pregnancies (timely PNC: OR 1.63 and adequate PNC: OR 1.22). Conclusions for Practice Given that untimely PNC is associated with adverse birth outcomes, the observed association warrants increased focus on implementing preconception care. Future studies should investigate how specific components of preconception care are associated with PNC timeliness/adequacy, health behaviors during pregnancy, and birth outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeckman, K., Louckx, F., & Putman, K. (2011). Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15, 1067–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bengiamin, M. I., Capitman, J. A., & Ruwe, M. B. (2010). Disparities in initiation and adherence to prenatal care: Impact of insurance, race-ethnicity and nativity. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 14(4), 618–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braveman, P., Marchi, K., Egerter, S., Pearl, M., & Neuhaus, J. (2000). Barriers to timely prenatal care among women with insurance: The importance of prepregnancy factors. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 95(6), 874–880.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, C. L., Ioannou, G. N., Rulyak, S. J., & Critchlow, C. (2003). Association between gestational diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158, 1148–1153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] (2000). Entry into prenatal care—United States, 1989–1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49(18), 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. 2014. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/prams/.

  • Chandler, D. (2002). Late entry into prenatal care in a rural setting. The Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 47(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M., Abelman, S., Schulkin, J., Williams, J. L., & Fassett, E. M. (2006). Do we practice what we preach? A review of actual clinical practice with regards to preconception care guidelines. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 10, S53–S58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hillemeier, M. M., Weisman, C. S., Chase, G. A., Dyer, A., & Shaffer, M. L. (2008). Women’s preconceptional health and use of health services: Implications for preconception care. HSR Heatlh Services Research, 43(1), 54–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulsey, T. M. (2001). Association between early prenatal care and mother’s intention of and desire for the pregnancy. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 30(3), 275–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Posner, S., Biermann, J., Cordero, J., Atrash, H., Parker, C. et al. (2006). Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55(RR-6), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmuss, D. (1990). Barriers to prenatal care among low-income women in New York City. Family Planning Perspectives, 22(5), 215–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotelchuck, M. (1994). An evaluation of the Kessner adequacy of prenatal care index and a proposed adequacy of prenatal care utilization index. American Journal of Public Health, 84(9), 1414–1420.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, P. M., & Sholl, T. O. (2000). Adequacy of prenatal care and pregnancy outcome. The Journal of American Osteopathic Association, 100(8), 485–492.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupek, E., Petrou, S., Vause, S., & Maresh, M. (2003). Clinical, provider, and sociodemographic predictors of late initiation of antenatal care in England and Wales. An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 109(3), 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Liu, J., Ye, R., & Li, Z. (2006). Association of preconceptional health care utilization and early initiation of prenatal care. Journal of Perinatology, 26, 409–413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado, G., & Greenland, S. (1993). Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 138(11), 923–936.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moos, M. K. (2004). Preconceptional health promotion: Progress in changing a prevention paradigm. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing, 18, 2–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. E., Pereyra, M. L., Rivero, Y., Danner, S. P., Cohen, M. H., Bradley-Byers, A., et al. (2009). Factors associated with prenatal care use among peripartum women in the Mother-Infant rapid intervention at delivery study. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 38(5), 534–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, P. A., Smerigio, V. L., Alexander, C. S., Connell, F. A., & Niebyl, J. R. (1990). Situational and financial barriers to prenatal care in a sample of low-income, inner-city women. Public Health Reports, 105(3), 264–267.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, H. B., Gilbert, B. C., & Lansky, A. (2006). The pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS): Current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates. Public Health Reports, 121(1), 74–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. (2013a). Child Health USA 2013. Rockville, Maryland. Retrieved from http://mchb.hrsa.gov/chusa13/health-services-utilization/p/prenatal-care-utilization.html.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Healthy People 2020. (2013b). Washington, DC. Retrieved November 17, 2013 from http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=26#376462.

  • Wiemann, C. M., Berenson, A. B., Garcia-del Pino, L., & McCombs, S. L. (1997). Factors associated with adolescents’ risk for late entry into prenatal care. Family Planning Perspecties, 29(6), 273–276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L., Zapata, L. B., D’Angelo, D. V., Harrison, L., & Morrow, B. (2012). Associations between preconception counseling and maternal behaviors before and during pregnancy. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 16, 1854–1861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) working group and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for providing access to the PRAMS dataset for this analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health Sciences, UNC Charlotte, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC, 28223, USA

    Meghan K. Wally, Larissa R. Brunner Huber, L. Michele Issel & Michael E. Thompson

Authors
  1. Meghan K. Wally
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larissa R. Brunner Huber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Michele Issel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael E. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meghan K. Wally.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wally, M.K., Huber, L.R.B., Issel, L.M. et al. The Association Between Preconception Care Receipt and the Timeliness and Adequacy of Prenatal Care: An Examination of Multistate Data from Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) 2009–2011. Matern Child Health J 22, 41–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2352-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2352-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation