Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Twenty-five years into “our common future”: are we heading in the right direction?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a quarter of a century, sustainable development has been on the political and research agendas. Within the field of landscape ecology, a wide array of research has documented the effects of alternative land uses, analysed driving forces of land use change and developed tools for measuring such changes, to mention but a few developments. There have also been great advances in technology and data management. Nevertheless, unsustainable land use continues to occur and the science of landscape ecology has had less influence on landscape change than aimed for. In this paper we use Norwegian examples to discuss some of the reasons for this. We examine mismatches in the spatial and temporal scales considered by scientists, decision-makers and those who carry out land use change, consider how this and other factors hinder effective communication between scientists and practitioners, and urge for a stronger focus on what it is that motivates people to action. We suggest that the concept of landscape services can be useful not only for researchers but also provide valuable communication and planning tools. Finally, we suggest more emphasis on applying adaptive management in landscape ecology to help close the gaps, both between researchers and policy and, even more crucially, between researchers and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern J (1999) Spatial concepts, planning strategies and future scenarios: a framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. In: Klopatek JM, Gardner RH (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 175–201

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ahern J (2006) Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. In: Tress B, Tress G, Fry G, Opdam P (eds), From landscape research to landscape planning. Aspects of integration, education and application, pp 119–131. Springer, Dordrecht

  • Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA (2005) The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: aA conceptual model. Am J Prev Med 28:159–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolliger J, Kienast F (2010) Landscape functions in a changing environment. Landsc Online 21:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton RJF, Kuczera C, Schwarz G (2008) Exploring farmers’ cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociol Rural 48:16–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye AS, Aarstad PA, Løvberget AI, Skjerpen C, Hoem B (2011) Jordbruk og miljø. Tilstand og utvikling 2011. Statistics Norway, Oslo-Kongsvinger

  • Carr S, Tait J (1991) Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications. J Environ Manag 32:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Döös BR (2002) Population growth and loss of arable land. Glob Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 12:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff G, Garnett D, Jacklyn P, Landsberg J, Ludwig J, Morrison J, Novelly P, Walker D, Whitehead P (2009) A collaborative design to adaptively manage for landscape sustainability in north Australia: lessons from a decade of cooperative research. Landscape Ecol 24:1135–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjellstad W, Dramstad WE (2005) 3Q: Endringer i jordbrukets kulturlandskap-Østfold, Oslo/Akershus og Vestfold. Norwegian Institute of Land Inventory, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R, Scannell L, Kormos C, Smolova L, Biel A, Boncu S, Corral V, Guntherf H, Hanyu K, Hine D, Kaiser FG, Korpela K, Lima LM, Mertig AG, Mira RG, Moser G, Passafaro P, Pinheiro JQ, Saini S, Sako T, Sautkina E, Savina Y, Schmuck P, Schultz W, Sobeck K, Sundblad EL, Uzzell D (2009) Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: an 18-nation study. J Environ Psychol 29:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66:290–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman RL (2010) Ecosystem services: how people benefit from nature. Environment 52:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Rayner P, Dawson B, Darvill B (2011) Translating research into action; bumblebee conservation as a case study. J Appl Ecol 48:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guldin RW (2003) Forest science and forest policy in the Americas: building bridges to a sustainable future. For Policy Econ 5:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Janse G (2008) Communication between forest scientists and forest policy-makers in Europe: a survey on both sides of the science/policy interface. For Policy Econ 10:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitão AB, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lokhorst AM, Staats H, van Dijk J, van Dijk E, de Snoo G (2011) What’s in it for Me? motivational differences between farmers’ subsidised and non-subsidised conservation practices. Appl Psychol (International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale) 60:337–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey JE, Vaughan M (2006) The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. Bioscience 56:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNie EC (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1988) The aesthetics of horticulture: neatness as a form of care. HortScience 23:973–977

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Opdam P (2008) Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol 23:633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI, Wang ZF, Dayrell E (2009) What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landsc Urban Plan 92:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (2011) Care and stewardship: from home to planet. Landsc Urban Plan 100:321–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norges lover (1928, 1995) The Land Act. Available from www.ub.uio.no/ujur/ulovdata/lov-19950512-023-eng.html Accessed 15 Mar 2012

  • Norwegian Ministry of Finance 2008. Norway’s Strategy for Sustainable Development. Published as part of the National Budget 2008. Government Administration Service, Oslo

  • Opdam P, Foppen R, Vos C (2002) Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecol 16:767–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1998) A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. Am Political Sci Rev 92:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pannell DJ, Roberts AM (2009) Conducting and delivering integrated research to influence land-use policy: salinity policy in Australia. Environ Sci Policy 12:1088–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potschin M, Haines-Young R (2008) Sustainability impact assessments: limits, thresholds and the sustainability choice space. In: Helming K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds) Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Riksrevisjonen (2002) Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av bygging i 100-metersbeltet langs sjøen. Riksrevisjonen, Oslo

  • Riksrevisjonen (2006) Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av myndighetenes arbeid med kartlegging og overvåking av biologisk mangfold og forvaltning av verneområder. Riksrevisjonen, Oslo

  • Riksrevisjonen (2007) Riksrevisjonens undersøkelse av bærekraftig arealplanlegging og arealdisponering i Norge. Dokument nr. 3-serien 3:12 (2005–2006). Riksrevisjonen, Oslo, p 100

  • Schenk A, Hunziker M, Kienast F (2007) Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures: a qualitative study in Switzerland. J Environ Manag 83:66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber ESG, Bearlin AR, Nicol SJ, Todd CR (2004) Adaptive management: a synthesis of current understanding and effective application. Ecol Manag Restor 5:177–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz PW (2011) Conservation means behavior. Conserv Biol 25:1080–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stankey GH, Clark RN, Bormann BT (2005) Adaptive management of natural resources: Theory, Concepts, and Management Institutions. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-654. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station

  • Stanners D, Bourdeau P (eds) (1995) Europe’s environment: the Dobříš assessment. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GB, Coles CF, Pullin AS (2005) Applying evidence-based practice in conservation management: lessons from the first systematic review and dissemination projects. Biol Conserv 126:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Progress Press, Malta

    Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P (2009) Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol 24:1037–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen JW, Opdam P, van den Brink A (2007) Incorporating ecological sustainability into landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 79:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald DM, Spies T, Kline J, Maxwell B, Hobbs NT, Dale VH (2005) Ecological support for rural land-use planning. Ecol Appl 15:1906–1914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED (1987) Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2009) Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecol 24:1053–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG (2006) Landscape ecology, cross-disciplinarity, and sustainability science. Landscape Ecol 21:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the three anonymous reviewers who provided valuable comments on the first draft of this manuscript. Part of this work was funded by the Norwegian Research Council (178371/I10).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenche E. Dramstad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dramstad, W.E., Fjellstad, W.J. Twenty-five years into “our common future”: are we heading in the right direction?. Landscape Ecol 28, 1039–1045 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9740-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9740-5

Keywords

Navigation