Skip to main content
Log in

Microcalorimetric qualitative analysis of biofilm development in porous media used in wastewater treatment by constructed wetland

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In wastewater treatment by constructed wetland, the biodegradation capability of the biomass developed in the soil is one of the most important factors. For this kind of treatment unit, soil properties are studied to improve its filtration capacity and hydraulic residence time of the wastewater. The impact of soil properties like porosity and soil components on biomass development and biodegradation capacity seem to be less studied certainly due to the complexity of microbial identification techniques currently used. The study presented here is a preliminary work to validate that calorimetric technique could be a tool in the understanding of biodegradation capacity of wastewater treatment processes. Biofilm is preliminary developed in columns filled with different porous materials of well known porosity and constitutive components. These columns are fed with the same continuous flow of synthetic solution (C, N, and P) as a substrate amending during 3 weeks. Then each week, 2 mL samples of porous media from these columns are analyzed in isothermal calorimeter for 48 h. Net heat flow is recorded before and after substrate injection. This work results in the definition of the procedure for batch experiments in calorimeter for wastewater process efficiency. The results of these experiments show that the microbial reaction due to substrate amendment is highly depending on the porous material used for biofilm growth. Indeed calorimetric signals recorded lead to conclude that biofilm grown on plastic beads has a faster and more intensive reaction to glucose amendment than biofilm grown on glass beads. At least, two glass beads samples analyzed in the calorimeter after the same duration of feeding with synthetic solution have very different response to glucose or synthetic solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

TOC:

Total organic carbon

CW:

Constructed wetland

T :

Temperature

Q T :

Total heat dissipated by the microbial growth reaction stimulated with glucose in J mL−1 of porous media

PT:

Peak time corresponding to time before the maximum of the peak of heat flow recorded

References

  1. Kadlec RH. The inadequacy of first-order treatment wetland models. Ecol Eng. 2000;15(1–2):105–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prochaska CA, Zouboulis AI, Eskridge KM. Performance of pilot-scale vertical-flow constructed wetlands, as affected by season, substrate, hydraulic load and frequency of application of simulated urban sewage. Ecol Eng. 2007;31:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Molle P, Liénard A, Grasmick A, Iwema A. Effect of reeds and feeding operations on hydraulic behaviour of vertical flow constructed wetlands under hydraulic overloads. Water Res. 2006;40(3):606–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kadlec RH. Overview: surface flow constructed wetlands: review article. Water Sci Technol. 1995;32(3):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kadlec RH, Werner TM. Wetland residence time distribution modeling. Ecol Eng. 2000;15(1–2):77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vymazal J. The use of sub-surface constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic: 10 years experience. Ecol Eng. 2002;18(5):633–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vymazal J. Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng. 2005;25(5):478–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L. Removal of organics in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow: a review of the field experience. Sci Total Environ. 2009;407:3912–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA. Macrophyte growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2006;63(10):1744–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chazarenc F, Merlin G, Gonthier Y. Hydrodynamics of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2003;21(2–3):165–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao L, Zhu W, Tong W. Clogging processes caused by biofilm growth and organic particle accumulation in lab-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. J Environ Sci. 2009;21:750–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen LM. Organic matter composition, microbial biomass and microbial activity in gravel-bed constructed wetlands treating farm dairy wastewaters. Ecol Eng. 2000;16:199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akratos CS, Tsihrintzis VA. Effect of temperature, HRT, vegetation and porous media on removal efficiency of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2007;29(2):173–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Calvet É, Prat H. Microcalorimétrie: Applications physico-chimiques et biologiques. Paris: Masson & Cie; 1956.

  15. Battley EH. The thermodynamics of microbial growth. In: Kemp RB, editor. Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry. vol 4: from macromolecules to man. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1999. p. 219–66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson C, Gustafsson L. Calorimetry of microbial processes. In: Kemp RB, editor. Handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry. vol 4: from macromolecules to man. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1999. p. 367–403.

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Stockar U, Vojinović V, Maskow T, Liu J. Can microbial growth yield be estimated using simple thermodynamic analogies to technical processes? Chem Eng Process Process Intensif. 2008;47(6):980–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nunez-Regueira L, Nunez-Fernandez O, Rodriguez Anon JA, Proupin Catineiras J. The influence of some physicochemical parameters on the microbial growth in soils. Thermochimica Acta. 2002;394:123–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barros N, Gallego M, Feijóo S. Sensitivity of calorimetric indicators of soil microbial activity. Thermochimica Acta. 2007;458(1–2):18–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barros N, Salgado J, Feijóo S. Calorimetry and soil. Thermochimica Acta. 2007;458(1–2):11–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barros N, Feijoó S, Balsa R. Comparative study of the microbial activity in different soils by the microcalorimetric method. Thermochimica Acta. 1997;296(1–2):53–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Barros N, Feijoo S, Simoni JA, Airoldi C, Ramajo B, Espina A, Garcia JR. A mass and energy balance to provide microbial growth yield efficiency in soil. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2008;93–2:657–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wadsö I. Characterization of microbial activity in soil by use of isothermal microcalorimetry. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2009;95–3:843–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey Soric.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soric, A., Ferrasse, JH. & Roche, N. Microcalorimetric qualitative analysis of biofilm development in porous media used in wastewater treatment by constructed wetland. J Therm Anal Calorim 104, 113–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1252-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-1252-4

Keywords

Navigation