Skip to main content
Log in

TEOS-based treatments for stone consolidation: acceleration of hydrolysis–condensation reactions by poulticing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethyl silicate (TEOS) is nowadays the most widely used consolidant for stone, due to its efficacy on silicate stones and also on limestones containing small amounts of quartz. However, because of the very long time required for TEOS curing reactions to be completed, the final mechanical improvement caused by the treatment is reached only after several months and, during this period, the treated stone is temporarily hydrophobic. This latter aspect is one of the most relevant drawbacks of TEOS, as it makes it impossible to perform water-based interventions after consolidation. Therefore, in this study the possible acceleration of TEOS curing reactions by prolonged contact with water, some time after consolidant application, was investigated. A commercial TEOS-based product was applied on Globigerina limestone, a porous stone from Malta containing also small amounts of quartz. After that preliminary tests indicated that prolonged contact with water is actually effective in both removing hydrophobicity and improving mechanical strength, a new consolidation cycle, based on TEOS application followed by application of a water-impregnated poultice was tested. The results of the study indicate that water application by poultice, after curing for 7 days, allows to remove the hydrophobicity and achieve higher mechanical properties than those obtained after curing for 4 weeks in laboratory conditions. Moreover, such mechanical properties are around 90 % of those achieved after curing for as much as 7 months, which points out that the proposed method is a very promising technique for accelerating TEOS curing reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wheeler G (2005) Alkoxysilanes and the consolidation of stone. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  2. Salazar-Hernandez C, Zarraga R, Alonso S, Sugita S, Calixto S, Cervantes J (2009) Effect of solvent type on polycondensation of TEOS catalysed by DBTL as used for stone consolidation. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 49:301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mosquera MJ, Pozo J, Esquivias L (2003) Stress during drying of two stone consolidants applied in monumental conservation. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 26:1227–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baglioni M, Berti D, Teixeira J, Giorgi R, Baglioni P (2012) Nanostructured surfactant-based systems for the removal of polymers from wall paintings: a small-angle neutron scattering study. Langmuir 28:15193–15202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Franzoni E, Pigino B, Leemann A, Lura P (2014) Use of TEOS for fired-clay bricks consolidation. Mater Struct 47:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu R, Han X, Huang X, Li W, Luo H (2013) Preparation of three-component TEOS-based composites for stone conservation by sol–gel processes. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 68:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandrolini F, Franzoni E, Pigino B (2012) Ethyl silicate for surface treatment of concrete—Part I: pozzolanic effect of ethyl silicate. Cem Concr Compos 34:306–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scherer GW, Wheeler GS (2009) Silicate consolidants for stone. Key Eng Mater 391:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xu F, Li D (2013) Effect of the addition of hydroxyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane to TEOS-based stone protective materials. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 65:212–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki P, Kallithrakas-Kontos N, Korakaki D, Agioutantis Z, Maurigiannakis S (2006) Evaluation of silicon-based strengthening agents on porous limestones. Prog Org Coat 57:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sassoni E, Franzoni E, Scherer GW, Naidu S (in press) Consolidation of a porous limestone by means of a new treatment based on hydroxyapatite. In: Proceedings of 12th international congress on deterioration and conservation of stone, Columbia University, New York City, 22–26 Oct 2012, pp 1–11. http://iscs.icomos.org/pdf-files/NewYorkConf/sassetal.pdf

  12. Sassoni E, Franzoni E, Pigino B, Scherer GW, Naidu S (2013) Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: comparison with a TEOS-based consolidant. J Cult Herit 14S:e103–e108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naidu S, Liu C, Scherer GW (in press) Novel hydroxyapatite-based consolidant and the acceleration of hydrolysis of silicate-based consolidants. In: Van-diver PB, Goodway M, Mass JL (eds) Materials issues in art and archaeology X. Proceedings of MRS symposium. Materials Research Society, Warrendale, PA, 2014

  14. Naidu S, Liu C, Scherer GW (2014) New techniques in limestone consolidation: hydroxyapatite-based consolidant and the acceleration of hydrolysis of silicate-based consolidants. J Cult Herit. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2014.01.001

  15. Sandrolini F, Franzoni E, Sassoni E, Diotallevi PP (2011) The contribution of urban-scale environmental monitoring to materials diagnostics: a study on the Cathedral of Modena (Italy). J Cult Herit 12:441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amoroso G, Fassina V (1983) Stone decay and conservation. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bortolotti V, Camaiti M, Casieri C, De Luca F, Fantazzini P, Terenzi C (2006) Water absorption kinetics in different wettability conditions studied at pore and sample scales in porous media by NMR with portable single-sided and laboratory imaging devices. J Magn Reson 181:287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matteini M, Rescic S, Fratini F, Botticelli G (2011) Ammonium phosphates as consolidating agents for carbonatic stone materials used in architecture and cultural heritage: preliminary research. Int J Archit Herit 5:717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW (1990) Sol–gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol–gel processing. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hench L, Ulrich R (1984) Ultrastructure processing of ceramics, glasses, and composites. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. I’Anson SJ, Hoff WD (1988) Chemical injection remedial treatments for rising damp-I. The interaction of damp-proofing fluids with porous building materials. Build Environ 23:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cassar J (2002) Deterioration of the Globigerina limestone of the Maltese Islands. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 205:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Briffa SM, Sinagra E, Vella D (in press) Teos based consolidants for maltese globigerina limestone: effect of hydroxyl conversion treatment. In: Proceedings of 12th international congress on deterioration and conservation of stone, New York City, 22–26 Oct 2012

  24. Franzoni E, Graziani G, Sassoni E, Bacilieri G, Griffa M, Lura P (2014) Solvent-based ethyl silicate for stone consolidation: influence of the application technique on penetration depth, efficacy and pore occlusion. Mater Struct. doi:10.1617/s11527-014-0417-1

  25. Franzoni E, Sassoni E, Scherer GW, Naidu S (2013) Artificial weathering of stone by heating. J Cult Herit 14S:e85–e93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Franzoni E, Sassoni E, Graziani G (2014) Brushing, poultice or immersion? Role of the application technique on the performance of a novel hydroxyapatite-based consolidating treatment for limestone. J Cult Herit. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2014.05.009

  27. Sassoni E, Franzoni E (2014) Influence of porosity on artificial deterioration of marble and limestone by heating. Appl Phys A-Mater 115:809–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferreira Pinto AP, Delgado Rodriguez J (2008) Stone consolidation: the role of treatment procedures. J Cult Herit 9:38–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. European Standard 15801 (2010) Conservation of cultural property—test methods—determination of water absorption by capillarity

  30. Rubio F, Rubio J, Oteo JL (1998) A FT-IR study of the hydrolysis of tetraethylortosilicate (TEOS). Spectrosc Lett 3(1):199–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Starov VM (2004) Surfactant solutions and porous substrates: spreading and imbibition. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 111:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Grazia Totaro (DICAM, University of Bologna) is gratefully acknowledged for contact angle measurements. Prof. Paolo Zannini and Dr. Silvia Minghelli (DSCG, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) are gratefully acknowledged for their contribution to the characterization of the fresh consolidant. Prof. George W. Scherer (CEE, Princeton University) is gratefully acknowledged for valuable discussion on acceleration of TEOS curing reactions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriela Graziani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franzoni, E., Graziani, G. & Sassoni, E. TEOS-based treatments for stone consolidation: acceleration of hydrolysis–condensation reactions by poulticing. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 74, 398–405 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-014-3610-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-014-3610-3

Keywords

Navigation