Skip to main content
Log in

Uranium assay determination using Davies and Gray titration: an overview and implementation of GUM for uncertainty evaluation

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) was developed to meet the demand for a standardized way of evaluating and expressing uncertainties. The Davies and Gray (D&G) titrimetry method is routinely used in nuclear safeguards for uranium accountability measurement and a statement of the uncertainty that can reasonably be attributed to the measured assay value is therefore of importance. A mathematical model for an uncertainty evaluation of D&G measurements in compliance with ISO GUM is presented. This is illustrated by a numerical example and the utilization of the uncertainty budget is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eberle AR, Lerner MW, Goldbeck CG, Rodden CJ (1970) U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, New Brunswick, NJ, NBL-252 (1970)

  2. Aigner H, Hollenthoner S, Keroe E, Kuhn E, Delle Site A, Zoigner A (1983) Fifth annual symposium on Safeguards and Nuclear Materials Management, Versailles, France

  3. Harrar JE, Boyle WG, Breshears JD, Pomernacki CL, Brand HR, Kray AM, Sherry RJ, Pastrone JA (1976) Proc. Inst. of Nuclear Materials Management Meeting, Seattle

  4. Reeder SD, Delmastro JR (1978) NBS Publication - 528

  5. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (2008) International vocabulary of metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM), JCGM 200

  6. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (1995) International Organization for Standardization, ISBN 92-67-10188-9

  7. Kacker R, Sommer KD, Kessel R (2007) Metrologia 44:513–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zook AC, Collins LL, Moran BW (1980) NBL-293, New Brunswick Laboratory, USDOE

  9. Goldbeck CG, Lerner MW (1972) Anal Chem 44:594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldbeck CG, Lerner MW, Peoples GE (1973) Annual Progress Report for the Period July 1972 to June 1973, U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, New Brunswick Laboratory, NJ, NBL-267

  11. Davies W, Gray W (1964) Talanta 11:1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bickel M (1997) J Nucl Mater 246(1997):30–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Casteleyn K et al (2000) Implementation of uncertainty estimation according to the ISO Guide in an analytical laboratory. In: INMM Proceedings

  14. Harrar JE, Boyle WG (1976) U. S. Energy Research & Development Administration UCRL-52060

  15. Slanina J, Bakker F, Groen AJP, Lingerak WA (1978) Z Anal Chem 289(1978):102–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ryzhinskii MV, Stepanov AV, Preobrazhenskaya LD, Solntseva LF, Gromova EA (1978) Translated from Zhurnal Analiticheskoi Khimii, 33(3), 499–505

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moran BW (1979) Nucl Technol 46:98–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kacker R, Jones A (2003) Metrologia 40:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. European Co-Operation for Accreditation, Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement in Calibration, EA-4/02, 1999

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. Mathew.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathew, K.J., Bürger, S., Vogt, S. et al. Uranium assay determination using Davies and Gray titration: an overview and implementation of GUM for uncertainty evaluation. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282, 939 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0186-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-009-0186-4

Keywords

Navigation