Abstract
Since the late nineteenth century, universities have been regarded as useful sources of technological development to stimulate economic activity. Therefore, many governments have encouraged research collaborations between universities and industries. A consequence of such collaboration in Korea, however, is that university researchers have difficulty claiming ownership of their technological developments. Typical contracts used in academia in Korea have biased benefits for industries. Research and development contract agreements that decrease negotiation efforts between the sectors of academia and industry are essential to increase the efficiency of industry-academia collaborations. In order to determine an optimal contract design, we use conjoint analysis of four attributes, including policies of ownership and compensation, indemnity responsibility, patent application and maintenance fees, and publication restrictions. The resulting preferences take into account the perspectives of both industry and academia. We expect our approach to contribute to increasingly healthy collaborations between industry and academia, which in turn will benefit industrial competition as well as the Korean economy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., & Causino, N. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734–1739.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24, 229–247.
Bruno, G. S. F., & Orsenigo, L. (2003). Variables influencing industrial funding of academic research in Italy. An empirical analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(2/3/4), 277–302.
Chamanski, A., & Waagø, S. J. (2001). Organizational performance of technology-based firms—The role of technology and business strategies. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 2(3), 205–223.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003a). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003b). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
Crespi, G., Geuna, A., Nomaler, O. & Verspagen, B. (2010). University IPRs and knowledge transfer. Is university ownership more efficient? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19 (forthcoming).
Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38(1), 26–34.
Dasgupta, P., & David, P. (1987). Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In G. Feiwel (Ed.), Arrow and the ascent of modern economic theory. New York: NYU Press. Chap 16.
Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university–industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy, 35, 309–323.
Fusfeld, H. I. (1994). Industry’s future. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Green, P. E., & Rao, V. (1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355–363.
Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2007). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35, 825–838.
Jaffe, A. B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firrus patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001.
Jeon, H. J., Kim, M. S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2010) Conjoint and WTP analysis of future mobile phones for digital convergence. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77(3), 457–465.
Jung, C. H. (2007). A study on patent related provisions in a joint research agreement. The Journal of Korean Industrial Property Right, 23, 349–394.
Kilger, C., & Bartenbach, K. (2002). New rules for German professors. Science, 298(8), 1173–1175.
Kim, G., Kim, A., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009a). Conjoint analysis for luxury brand outlet malls in Korea with consideration of customer lifetime value. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 922–932.
Kim, A., Son, S., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009b). Conjoint analysis of enhanced english medium instruction for college students. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 10197–10203.
Korean Intellectual Property Office. (2008, 2010). http://www.kipo.go.kr/.
Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111–133.
Libaers, D., Meyer, M., & Geuna, A. (2006). The role of university spinout companies in an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 443–450.
Merton, D., & Starer, N. W. (Eds.). (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mok, M. S., Sohn, S. Y., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Conjoint analysis for intellectual property education. World Patent Information, 32(2), 129–134.
Mowery, D., Nelson, R., Sampat, B., & Ziedonis, A. (2001). The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effect of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy, 30, 99–119.
National Academy of Sciences. (1995). Allocating federal funds for science and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Rosenberg, N., & Nelson, R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.
Schmiemann, M., & Durvy, J. N. (2003). New approaches to technology transfer from publicly funded research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 9–15.
Sohn, S. Y., & Ju, Y. H. (2010). Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3777–3783.
Song, J., Jang, T., & Sohn, S. Y. (2009). Conjoint analysis for IPTV service. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7860–7864.
Stern, A. (1989). Information transfer between an academic research center and its member firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 14(3/4), 19–24.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 87(3), 290–306.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the Ministry of Knowledge Economy (MKE) and Korea Institute for Advancement in Technology (KIAT) through the Workforce Development Program in Strategic Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sohn, S.Y., Lee, M. Conjoint analysis of R&D contract agreements for industry-funded university research. J Technol Transf 37, 532–549 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9220-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9220-0