Abstract
While there has been much emphasis over the last decade on the science of nanotechnology and on the implications and risks of potential applications, it is now timely to increase attention to the emerging dynamics of nanotechnology commercialization. This paper examines, from a global perspective, where and how corporations are entering into nanotechnology innovation. The paper tests the proposition that a significant shift has occurred in recent years in the orientation of corporate nanotechnology activities—from research discovery to patented applications. It also examines the extent to which the character and structure of corporate nanotechnology activity by country initially reflects national innovation system characteristics and prior public research funding inputs in the stage when discovery is most emphasized. The results indicate that national innovation systems characteristics are significant factors in the commercialization shift of nanotechnology and highlight the importance of innovation system policy factors. We also observe the influence of cross-border international invention linkages, suggesting that national innovation policies also need to be open and international in orientation.
References
Acedo, F. J., & Jones, M. V. (2007). Speed of internationalization and entrepreneurial cognition: Insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 236–252. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.012. [Review].
Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance: How the communications revolution is changing our lives. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review.
Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
Cohen, S. S., Di Minin, A., Motoyama, Y., & Palmberg, C. (2009). The persistence of home bias for important r&d in wireless telecom and automobiles. Review of Policy Research, 26(1/2), 55–76. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00369.x. [Article].
Edquist, C. (Ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations. London, Washington: Pinter Publisher.
Fernández-Ribas, A. (2009). Firms’ global patent strategies in an emerging technology. IEEE Xplore, October 2009.
Fernández-Ribas, A., & Shapira, P. (2009). Technological diversity, scientific excellence and the location of inventive activities abroad: The case of nanotechnology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 286–303.
Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. London: Frances Pinter.
Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Gilbert, B. A., McDougall, P. P., & Audretsch, D. B. (2006). New venture growth: A review and extension. [Review]. Journal of Management, 32(6), 926-950, doi:10.1177/0149206306293860.
Glanzel, W., Meyer, M., Plessis, M., Thijs, B., Magerman, T., Schlemmer, B., et al. (2003). Nano-technology, analysis of an emerging domain of scientific and technological endeavor. Leuven, Belgium: Report of Steunpunt O&O Statistieken.
Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61.
Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 725–760.
Laredo, P. (2008). Positioning the work done on nano s&t associated to prime. Manchester, UK: Paper presented at the Nanotechnology Science Mapping and Innovation Trajectories. September 9.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.
Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1998). First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1111–1125.
Lundvall, B. Á. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publ.
Lux Research. (2007). The nanotech report 2006: Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology. New York, NY: Lux Research.
Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation. In J. Fabergerg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 380–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDougall, P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: The limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487.
Mowery, D. (2010). Nanotechnology and the U.S. National innovation system: Continuity and change. Paper presented at the Transatlantic Workshop on Nanotechnology Innovation and Policy, Atlanta, Georgia USA, March 24–26.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (1994). Toward a theory of international ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45–64.
Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (2005). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 29–41.
Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1991). Large firms in the production of the world’s technology: An important case of “non-globalisation”. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 1–21.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.
PEN (2009a). Consumer products inventory, project on emerging nanotechnologies. http://www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/. Accessed 28 August 2009.
PEN. (2009b). Nanotech-enabled consumer products top the 1, 000 mark. Release no. 64–09. Washington, DC: Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.
Porter, A. L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.
Rennie, M. (1993). Global competitiveness: Born global. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 45–52.
Roco, M. C. (2004). Nanoscale science and engineering: Unifying and transforming tools. AIChE Journal, 50(5), 890–897.
Rothaermel, F., & Thursby, M. (2007). The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy, 36(6), 832–849.
Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in silicon valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmoch, U. (2007). Double-boom cycles and the comeback of science-push and market-pull. Research Policy, 36(7), 1000–1015.
Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). From lab to market: Strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in china. Journal of Asian Business Management, 8(4), 461–489.
Shapira, P., & Youtie, J. (2008). Nanodistricts in the United States. Economic Development Quarterly, 22(3), 187–199.
Shapira, P., Youtie, J., & Mohapatra, S. (2003). Linking research production and development outcomes at the regional level. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 105–116.
Subramanian, V., Youtie, J., Porter, A. L., & Shapira, P. (2009). Is there a shift to “active nanostructures? Journal of Nanoparticle Research (in press). Available Online First, August 2009.
Tang, L., Shapira, P., & Wang, J. (2009). China. In D. Guston (Ed.), Encyclopedia of nanoscience and society. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.
UNESCO (2010). Gross domestic expenditures on R&D (GERD). http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=1781. Accessed 10 April 2010.
VanderWerf, P. A., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). Meta-analysis of the impact of research methods on findings of firsts-mover advantage. Management Science, 43(11), 1510–1519.
Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2009). Partnering with universities: A good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms? Small Business Economics (Online First).
World Bank (2010). Country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups#High_income. Accessed 10 April 2010.
Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., & Graham, S. (2007). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 123–130.
Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Porter, A. L. (2008). Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(6), 981–986.
Acknowledgments
This research received support from the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (National Science Foundation Award 0531194). The findings and observations contained in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Transatlantic Workshop on Nanotechnology Innovation and Policy, March 24–26, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shapira, P., Youtie, J. & Kay, L. National innovation systems and the globalization of nanotechnology innovation. J Technol Transf 36, 587–604 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9212-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9212-0