Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Cohesion, Structural Holes, and a Tale of Two Measures

  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the social sciences, the debate over the structural foundations of social capital has long vacillated between two positions on the relative benefits associated with two types of social structures: closed structures, rich in third-party relationships, and open structures, rich in structural holes and brokerage opportunities. In this paper, we engage with this debate by focusing on the measures typically used for formalising the two conceptions of social capital: clustering and effective size. We show that these two measures are simply two sides of the same coin, as they can be expressed one in terms of the other through a simple functional relation. Building on this relation, we then attempt to reconcile closed and open structures by proposing a new measure, Simmelian brokerage, that captures opportunities of brokerage between otherwise disconnected cohesive groups of contacts. Implications of our findings for research on social capital and complex networks are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahuja, G.: Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 45, 425–455 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aral, S., Van Alstyne, M.: The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Am. J. Sociol. 117(1), 90–171 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrat, A., Barthélemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3747–3752 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baum, J.A.C., McEvily, B., Rowley, T.J.: Better with age? Tie longevity and the performance implications of bridging and closure. Organ. Sci. 23, 529–546 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borgatti, S.P.: Structural holes: unpacking Burt’s redundancy measures. Connections 20, 35 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brass, D.J.: It’s all in your social network. In: Ford, C.M., Gioia, D.A. (eds.) Creative Action in Organizations, pp. 94–98. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burt, R.S.: Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burt, R.S.: The gender of social capital. Ration. Soc. 10, 5–46 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burt, R.S.: Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110, 349–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burt, R.S.: Brokerage and Closure. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Burt, R.S.: Neighbor Networks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Burt, R.S., Knez, M.: Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Ration. Soc. 7, 255–292 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Centola, D., Macy, M.W.: Complex contagion and the weakness of long ties. Am. J. Sociol. 113, 702–734 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coleman, J.S.: Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am. J. Sociol. 94, S95–S120 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman, J.S.: Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis, J.A.: Clustering and hierarchy in interpersonal relations: testing two graph theoretical models on 742 sociomatrices. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35(5), 843–851 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davis, J.A., Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Comments on Professor Mazur’s hypothesis about interpersonal sentiments. Am. Sociol. Rev. 36, 309–311 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dekker, D.: Measures of Simmelian tie strength, Simmelian brokerage, and Simmelianly brokered. J. Soc. Struct. 7(1), 1–22 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming, L., Mingo, S., Chen, D.: Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Adm. Sci. Q. 52, 443–475 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486, 75–174 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedkin, N.E.: Social cohesion. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30, 409–425 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gargiulo, M., Benassi, M.: Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 11, 183–196 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gargiulo, M., Ertug, G., Galunic, C.: The two faces of control: network closure and individual performance among knowledge workers. Adm. Sci. Q. 54, 299–333 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gould, R.V.: Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871. Am. Sociol. Rev. 56, 716–729 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Granovetter, M.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78, 1360–1380 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Granovetter, M.: The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 19(1), 33–50 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hansen, M.T.: The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44, 232–248 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. Am. J. Sociol. 76, 492–513 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Holland, P.W., Leinhardt, S.: Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Comp. Group Stud. 2, 107–124 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Holme P., Kim, B.J.: Growing scale-free networks with tunable clustering. Phys. Rev. E 65, 026107 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Holme, P., Park, S.M., Kim, B.J., Edling, C.R.: Korean university life in a network perspective: dynamics of a large affiliation network. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl. 373, 821–830 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ingram, P., Roberts, P.W.: Friendships among competitors in the Sydney hotel industry. Am. J. Sociol. 106(2), 387–423 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Krackhardt, D.: Simmelian tie: super strong and sticky. In: Kramer, R.M., Neale, M.A. (eds.) Power and Influence in Organizations, pp. 21–38. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Krackhardt, D.: The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 16, 183–210 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Krackhardt, D., Kilduff, M.: Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Soc. Netw. 24, 279–290 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lambiotte, R., Panzarasa, P.: Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. J. Informetr. 3(3), 180–190 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Efficient behavior of small-world networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 198701 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Latora, V., Marchiori, M.: Economic behavior of small-world networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 249–263 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lin, N.: Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin, N., Cook, K., Burt, R.S. (eds.): Social Capital. Theory and Research. Aldine Transaction, New Brunswick and London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Long Lingo, E., O’Mahony, S.: Nexus work: brokerage on creative projects. Adm. Sci. Q. 55, 47–81 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Luce, R.D., Perry, A.D.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14(1), 95–116 (1949)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Mizruchi, M., Stearns, L.B.: Getting deals done: the use of social networks in bank decision-making. Am. Sociol. Rev. 66, 647–671 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nahapiet, J., Ghoshal, S.: Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23, 242–266 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Obstfeld, D.: Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 50, 100–130 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Onnela, J.-P., Saramäki, J., Kertész, J., Kaski, K.: Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 71, 065103 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Opsahl, T., Panzarasa, P.: Clustering in weighted networks. Soc. Netw. 31, 155–163 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435(7043), 814–818 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Perry-Smith, J.E.: Social yet creative: the role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 49, 85–101 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Podolny, J.M., Baron, J.N.: Resources and relationships: social networks and mobility in the workplace. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62, 673–693 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ravasz, E., Barabási, A.-L.: Hierarchical organization in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 67, 026112 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q. 48, 240–267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E.: Networks, diversity and performance: the social capital of R&D units. Organ. Sci. 12, 502–517 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rodan, S., Galunic, C.: More than network structure: how knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strateg. Manag. J. 25, 541–562 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Saramäki, J., Kivelä, M., Onnela, J.-P., Kaski, K., Kertész, J.: Generalizations of the clustering coefficient to weighted complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 75, 027105 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Serrano, M.A., Boguñá, M.: Tuning clustering in random networks with arbitrary degree distributions. Phys. Rev. E 72, 036133 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Simmel, G.: The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Lightning Source, Milton Keynes ([1923] 2011). Trans. by K.H. Wolff

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sosa, M.E.: Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organ. Sci. 22, 1–21 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Stovel, K., Shaw, L.: Brokerage. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38, 139–158 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tortoriello, M., Krackhardt, D.: Activating cross-boundary knowledge: the role of Simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Acad. Manag. J. 53(1), 167–181 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R., McEvily, B.: Bridging the knowledge gap: the influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23, 1024–1039 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Uzzi, B.: Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 43, 35–67 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Uzzi, B., Spiro, J.: Collaboration and creativity: the small world problem. Am. J. Sociol. 111, 447–504 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Vázquez, A.: Growing network with local rules: preferential attachment, clustering hierarchy, and degree correlations. Phys. Rev. E 67, 056104 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Vázquez, A., Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Large-scale topological and dynamical properties of the Internet. Phys. Rev. E 65, 066130 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Vedres, B., Stark, D.: Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. Am. J. Sociol. 115(4), 1150–1190 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Watts, D.J.: Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393, 440 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhang, B., Horvath, S.: A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, 17 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, E1 4NS, London, UK

    V. Latora & V. Nicosia

  2. School of Business and Management, Queen Mary University of London, E1 4NS, London, UK

    P. Panzarasa

Authors
  1. V. Latora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Nicosia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Panzarasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Panzarasa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latora, V., Nicosia, V. & Panzarasa, P. Social Cohesion, Structural Holes, and a Tale of Two Measures. J Stat Phys 151, 745–764 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0722-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0722-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation