Abstract
This qualitative study focuses on the "underground" practices of Sunni Muslim physicians and patients who are performing and undergoing religiously prohibited third-party gamete donation. It is based on face-to-face interviews with two Sunni Muslim gynecologists and 25 Sunni Muslim women who underwent third-party gamete donation treatments and gave birth to a baby. The analysis of the interviews sheds light on patients' experiences regarding donation and explores the experiences of the gynecologists. The patients shared with us their inner conflict regarding childbearing using either donated sperm or a donated egg. They expressed a subversive attitude toward the religious authorities and the Islamic fatwa (religious ruling) that prohibits third-party gamete donation. The gynecologists provide fertility care involving third-party gamete donation despite Islamic religious prohibitions; in consequence, they suffer feelings of guilt for their actions. The study participants challenge accepted binary conceptions regarding the boundaries between religious laws and the desire to produce offspring, between what is allowed and what is forbidden, between guilt and happiness, and between the desire to maintain a marital relationship and the desire to comply with cultural–religious rules. Based on Gloria Anzaldua’s theory of the borderlands, and the context-informed approach, this study underscores the importance of giving voice to Sunni Muslim patients who underwent third-party gamete donation treatments and contributes to a deeper understanding of their dilemma of finding a reproductive solution that does not run counter to religious values.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Bar, M.A., & Chamsi-Pasha, H. (2015). Assisted reproductive technology: Islamic perspective. In: Contemporary Bioethics (pp. 173–186). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18428-9_11
Anzaldúa, G. E. (2015). ‘Light in the Dark/Luz en lo Oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality’. Duke University Press.
Ardakani, Z. B., Navabakhsh, M., Tremayne, S., Akhondi, M. M., Ranjbar, F., & Tabrizi, A. M. (2021). The impact of third-party reproduction on family and kinship. Journal of Reproduction & Infertility, 22(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.18502/jri.v22i1.4990
Arousell, J., & Carlbom, A. (2016). Culture and religious beliefs in relation to reproductive health. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 32, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.011
Bai, C.-F., Cui, N.-X., Xu, X., Mi, G.-l, Sun, J.-W., Shao, D., Li, J., Jiang, Y.-Z., Yang, Q.-Q., Zhang, X., & Cao, F.-L. (2019). Effectiveness of two guided self-administered interventions for psychological distress among women with infertility: A three-armed, randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction, 34(7), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez066
Bennett, L. R. (2018). Infertility, adoption, and family formation in Indonesia. Medical Anthropology, 37(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1407931
Blell, M. (2018). British Pakistani Muslim masculinity, (in) fertility, and the clinical encounter. Medical Anthropology, 37(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2017.1364736
Bokek-Cohen, Y. (2016). Jewish law, scarcity of sperm donors and the consequent private import of sperm of non-Jews by Israeli women. Gynecologic & Obstetric Investigation, 81, 105–111.
Bulcroft, R., & Teachman, J. (2004). Ambiguous constructions: Development of a childless or child-free life course. In R. Bulcroft & J. Teachman (Eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Families: Considering the Past, Contemplating the Future. Chapter. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976022.n7
Clarke, M. (2008). New kinship, Islam, and the liberal tradition: Sexual morality and new reproductive technology in Lebanon. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00483.x
Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and new kinship: Reproductive technology and the Shariah in Lebanon (Vol. 16). Berghahn Books.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Demirel, G., Yilmaz, F. T., & Yenicesu, A. G. (2021). The relation between religious coping, adjustment to fertility, being affected by infertility, and satisfaction with life in Turkish women with infertility. Journal of Religion and Health, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01319-1
Elmir, R., Schmied, V., Jackson, D., & Wilkes, L. (2011). Interviewing people about potentially sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher, 19(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2011.10.19.1.12.c8766
Ferraretti, A. P., Pennings, G., Gianaroli, L., Natali, F., & Magli, M. C. (2010). Cross-border reproductive care: A phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(2), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.009
Gameiro, S., El Refaie, E., Bliesemann de Guevara, B., & Payson, A. (2019). Women from diverse minority ethnic or religious backgrounds desire more infertility education and more culturally and personally sensitive fertility care. Human Reproduction, 34(9), 1735–1745. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez156
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2000). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge.
Goldman, K. N., Blakemore, J., Kramer, Y., McCulloh, D. H., Lawson, A., & Grifo, J. A. (2019). Beyond the biopsy: Predictors of decision regret and anxiety following preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Human Reproduction, 34(7), 1260–1269. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez080
Grasmick, H. G., Wilcox, L. P., & Bird, S. R. (1990). The effects of religious fundamentalism and religiosity on preference for traditional family norms. Sociological Inquiry, 60(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1990.tb00154.x
Greil, A., McQuillan, J., Benjamins, M., Johnson, D. R., Johnson, K. M., & Heinz, C. R. (2010). Specifying the effects of religion on medical helpseeking: The case of infertility. Social Science & Medicine, 71(4), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.033
Gürtin, Z. B., Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2015). Islam and assisted reproduction in the Middle East: Comparing the Sunni Arab world, Shia Iran and secular Turkey. In S. D. Brunn (Ed.), The Changing World Religion Map (pp. 3137–3153). Springer.
Gürtin, Z. B. (2016). Patriarchal pronatalism: Islam, secularism and the conjugal confines of Turkey's IVF boom. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 2, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.04.005
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & de Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction, 31, 498–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev334
Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86(3), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000
Homburg, R., Husain, F., Gudi, A., Brincat, M., & Shah, A. (2018). Religious attitudes to gamete donation. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 231, 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.051
Husain, F. A. (2000). Reproductive issues from the Islamic perspective. Human Fertility, 3(2), 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464727002000198831
Inhorn, M. C. (2004). Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: Male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 18, 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2004.18.2.162
Inhorn, M. C. (2006a). “He won’t be my son”: Middle Eastern Muslim men’s discourses of adoption and gamete donation. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2006.20.1.94
Inhorn, M. C. (2011). Globalization and gametes: Reproductive ‘tourism’, Islamic bioethics, and Middle Eastern modernity. Anthropology & Medicine, 18(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2010.525876
Inhorn, M. C. (2012). The new Arab man: Emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton University Press.
Inhorn, M., & Tremayne, S. (2016). Islam, assisted reproduction and the bioethical aftermath. Journal of Religion & Health, 55, 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0151-1
Inhorn, M. C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Tremayne, S., & Gürtin, Z. B. (2017). Assisted reproduction and Middle East kinship: A regional and religious comparison. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.06.003
Inhorn, M. C., & Van Balen, F. (Eds.). (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Univ. of California Press.
Inhorn, M. C. (1996). Infertility and patriarchy: The cultural politics of gender and family life in Egypt. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Inhorn, M. C. (2006b). Fatwas and ARTs: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 9, 291–317.http://hdl.handle.net/10822/984006
Inhorn, M. C. (2006c). Making Muslim babies: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni versus Shi’a Islam. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry, 30(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-006-9027-x
Jensen, L., & Jensen, J. (1993). Family values, religiosity, and gender. Psychological Reports, 73(2), 429–430.
Khan, M. A., & Konje, J. C. (2019). Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 232, 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.052
Kooli, C. (2020). Review of assisted reproduction techniques, laws, and regulations in Muslim countries. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-019-0011-0
Koropeckyj-Cox, T., & Pendell, G. (2007). Attitudes about childlessness in the United States: Correlates of positive, neutral, and negative responses. Journal of Family Issues, 28(8), 1054–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X07301940
Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A iterature review. Quality & Quantity 47(4), 2025–2047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
Larijani, B., & Zahedi, F. (2007). Ethical and religious aspects of gamete and embryo donation and legislation in Iran. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-007-9108-3
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1991). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Marey-Sarwan, I., Otto, H., Roer-Strier, D., & Keller, H. (2015). Parenting among the Arab Bedouins in the Naqab desert in Israel: Children are a gift from God. In G. Nicolas, A. Bejarano, & D. L. Lee (Eds.), Contemporary parenting: A global perspective (pp. 105–123). Routledge.
Mitra, P. (2021). The beginning of life issues: An Islamic perspective. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(2), 663–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-020-01018-3
Nadan, Y., & Roer-Strier, D. (2020). A context-informed perspective of child risk and protection: Deconstructing myths in the risk discourse. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(4), 464–477.
Saniei, M., & Kargar, M. (2021). Modern assisted reproductive technologies and bioethics in the Islamic context. Theology and Science, 19(2), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2021.1910914
Scott, C., & Tuana, N. (2017). Nepantla: Writing (from) the in-between. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 31(1), 1–15.
Serour, G. I., & Dickens, B. M. (2001). Assisted reproduction developments in the Islamic world. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 74(2), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(01)00425-8
Serour, G. I., Aboulghar, M. A., & Mansour, R. T. (1995). Bioethics in medically assisted conception in the Muslim world. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 12(9), 559–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212574
Serour, G. I. (2005). Opinion: Religious perspectives of ethical issues in ART 1. Islamic perspectives of ethical issues in ART. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 10(3), 185–190.
Simpson, B., Hampshire, K., & Blell, M. (2014). British Pakistani Muslims, infertility and the new reproductive technologies: Summary of findings. Durham University.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Tremayne, S., & Akhondi, M. M. (2016). Conceiving IVF in Iran. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 2, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2016.07.002
Tremayne, S., & Inhorn, M. C. (2012). Introduction: Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. In M. C. Inhorn & S. Tremayne (Eds.), Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives (pp. 1–21). Berghahn.
Van Hoof, W., & Pennings, G. (2011). Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: Should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment? Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 23(5), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.015
West, B. T., & Blom, A. G. (2017). Explaining interviewer effects: A research synthesis. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 5(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw024
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bokek-Cohen, Y., Marey-Sarwan, I. & Tarabeih, M. Underground Gamete Donation in Sunni Muslim Patients. J Relig Health 61, 2905–2926 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01440-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01440-1