Skip to main content
Log in

Linguistic Markers and Emotional Intensity

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment is to explore possible relationships between the intensity of emotions and the lexical modalities for expressing those emotions. In this experiment, 60 Hebrew-speaking subjects were asked to watch four short films that aroused emotion. Two of the films gave rise to different degrees of happiness, and two produced sadness. At the end of each film, subjects were asked to report on their emotions. This experiment was based on the supposition that there is a relationship between the various lexical modalities used by the subjects when writing about their emotions and the intensity of those emotions. The lexical modalities examined included intensifiers, the use of emotion words, repetitions, the use of first person singular, the use of metaphors, and the use of exclamations, among others. This experiment supported the research hypothesis, as it confirmed that significant differences existed between the lexical modalities found in texts written with lower emotional intensity (for both happiness and sadness) and those written with greater emotional intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Boals A., Klein K. (2005) Word use in emotional narratives about failed romantic relationships and subsequent mental health. Journal of language and social Psychology 24(3): 252–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci W. (2001) Pathways of emotional communication. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 21(1): 40–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn M. A., Mehl M. R., Pennebaker J. W. (2004) Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science 15(10): 687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davitz J. R. (1969) The language of emotion. Academic Press, New-York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman P. (1984) Expression and the nature of emotion. In: Scherer K. R., Ekman P. (eds) Approaches to emotion. Hillsdale, NJ, pp 319–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield N. J., Wierzbicka A. (2002) Introduction: The body in description of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 10(1-2): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud S. (1958) Psychopathology of everyday life. Comet Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N. H., Ortony A., Sonnemans J., Clore G. L. (1992) The complexity of intensity: Issues concerning the structure of emotion intensity. In: Clark M. S. (eds) Emotion: Review of personality and social psychology, vol 13. Newbury Park, London & New Delhi, pp 60–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda N. H. (1994) Varieties of affect: Emotions and episodes, moods and sentiments. In: Ekman P., Davidson R. J. (eds) The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions. Oxford Academic Press, New-York, pp 59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenson, R. M. (Ed.). (1984). Longman dictionary of psychology and psychiatry. New-York & London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross J. J., Levenson R. W. (1995) Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion 9(1): 87–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heizner, Z. (1994). The rhetoric of trauma, PhD Dissertation supervised by Prof. Ramon-Keinan and Prof. Shalev, Jerusalem: The Hebrew University (in Hebrew).

  • Jakobson R. (1960) Linguistics and poetics. In: Sebeok T. A. (eds) Style in language. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 350–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird P. N., Oatley K. (1989) The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition & Emotion 3(2): 81–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. E. (1989). Cognitive emotional interactions in the brain. In C. E. Izard (Ed.), Development of emotion relations, N.J: Hillsdale (Special issue of Cognition & Emotion, 1989, 3/4), (pp. 267–289).

  • Ortony A., Clore G. L., Foss M. A. (1987) The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science 11: 341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood C. E. (1958) Some effects of motivation on style of encoding. In: Sebeok T. A. (eds) Style in language. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Planalp S. (1999) Communicating emotion: Social, moral and cultural processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenzein R. (1994) Pleasure-arousal theory and the intensity of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 525–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer K. R. (1993) Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion 7(3/4): 325–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storm C., Storm T. (1987) A taxonomic study of the vocabulary of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 805–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walman , B. B. (Ed.). (1973). Dictionary of behavioral science. Van Nostrad Reinhold Company: New-York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, H. C. (Ed.). (1962). Dictionary of psychology, 1934/1962 (renewed). Cambridge: The Riverside Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osnat Argaman.

Additional information

This article is based on part of my dissertation: “The Denotations of Emotion Words and the Lexical Means for their Expression in Hebrew”, supervised by Prof. Michal Ephratt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Argaman, O. Linguistic Markers and Emotional Intensity. J Psycholinguist Res 39, 89–99 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9127-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9127-1

Keywords

Navigation