Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

eHealth in Denmark: A Case Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Denmark is widely regarded as a leading country in terms of eHealth integration and healthcare delivery services. The push for eHealth adoption over that past 20 years in the Danish health sector has led to the deployment of multiple eHealth technologies. However, in reality the Danish healthcare suffers from eHealth system fragmentation which has led to eHealth’s inability to reach full potential in delivering quality healthcare service. This paper will presents a case study of the current state of eHealth in the Danish healthcare system and discuss the current challenges the country is facing today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhanoo SN (2010) Denmark Leads the Way in Digital Care. The New York Times

  2. Harrell E (2009) In Denmark’s Electronic Health Records Program, a Lesson for the U.S. - TIME. TIME Magazine. Time Inc.,

  3. Economist (2011) Future-proofing western Europe’s healthcare. A study of five countries. Economist Intelligence Unit

  4. Dobrev A, Haesner M, Hüsing T, Korte WB, Meyer I (2008) Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe. European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate-General

  5. van der Zee, J., and Kroneman, M. W., Bismarck or Beveridge: a beauty contest between dinosaurs. BMC health services research 7:94, 2007. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Strandberg-Larsen M, Krasnik A (2008) Does a public single payer system deliver integrated services? A national survey study among professional stakeholders in Denmark, vol 8. 2008, vol 5. Igitur,

  7. Olejaz, M., Nielsen, A. J., Rudkjøbing, A., Birk, H. O., Krasnik, A., and Hernández-Quevedo, C., Denmark: Health System Review. Health Systems in Transition 14(2):1–192, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. laegemiddelstyrelsen (2012) Danish healthcare sector at a glance. Danish Health and Medicines Authority. http://www.sst.dk/English/The_Danish_healthcare_sector. Accessed 10 Oct. 2012

  9. Protti D, Johansen I (2010) Widespread Adoption of Information Technology in Primary Care Physician Offices in Denmark: A Case Study. The Commonwealth Fund

  10. MedCom (2013) Lægesystemer i Danmark. MedCom.dk. http://www.medcom.dk/wm109996. Accessed Sep 19 2013

  11. OECD Health Data 2012 (2012) http://www.oecd.org/els/healthpoliciesanddata/oecdhealthdata2012.htm. Accessed 15 November 2012

  12. RSI (2010) Udviklingen i regionale epj-landskaber 2007–2010 (trans: Sundheds-it RR). RSI: Regionernes Sundheds-it, vol RSI: Regionernes Sundheds-it. NextPuzzle ApS, Copenhagen

  13. MedCom (2013) Sygehus-epj-systemer. MedCom.dk. http://www.medcom.dk/wm111413. Accessed Sep. 19 2013

  14. Rigsrevisionen, Elektroniske patientjournaler på sygehusene. Rigsrevisionen, Copenhagen, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. MedCom (2012) PLO-XML-/FNUX-format. MedCom.dk. http://www.medcom.dk/wm111572. Accessed 20-Sep 2013

  16. Medcom (2013) MedCom Messages per Month. MedCom. http://www.medcom.dk/wm110000. Accessed 20 Sep 2013

  17. Electronic Health Records: A Global Perspective. A Work Product of the HIMSS Enterprise Systems Steering Committee and the Global Enterprise Task Force. (2008). Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS).

  18. Det digitale samfund 2010 (2010). IT- og Telestyrelsen,

  19. RSI (2011) Telemedicinstrategi.

  20. Rudkjøbing A, Olejaz M, Birk HO, Nielsen AJ, Hernández-Quevedo C, Krasnik A (2012) Integrated care: a Danish perspective. BMJ 345. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4451

  21. Boysen, M., Hospitalslæger har svært ved at håndtere recept-server. Dagens Medicin 02(11):2010, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beskrivelse af GEPJ—på begrebsniveau (2004). National Board of Health,

  23. Aanestad, M., and Jensen, T. B., Building nation-wide information infrastructures in healthcare through modular implementation strategies. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 20(2):161–176, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2011.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nationalt Patientindeks. (2012) National Sundheds-it. http://www.ssi.dk/Sundhedsdataogit/National%20Sundheds-it/Nationalt%20Patientindeks.aspx. Accessed 19 Sep. 2012

  25. National-Sundheds-it (2012) What initiatives have we launched? National Sundheds-it. http://www.ssi.dk/English/HealthdataandICT/National%20Board%20of%20e-Health/What%20initiatives%20have%20we%20launched.aspx. Accessed 19 Sep. 2012

  26. Lund, S. R., Staten ramt af ny it-fadæse. Kommunen 19(05):2013, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jyllands-Posten, Livsfarligt rod i patienters journaler. Jyllands-Posten, 5(Dec.), 2010.

  28. Drevsfeldt S (2010) Kroniske patienter mangler oplysning og indlægges oftere. Information.dk, 3. August 2010,

  29. Smith, P., Araya-Guerra, R., Bublitz, C., Parnes, B., Dickinson, L., Vorst, R. V., Westfall, J., and Pace, W., Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 293(5):565–571, 2005. doi:10.1001/jama.293.5.565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Elder, N. C., and Hickner, J., Missing clinical information: The system is down. JAMA 293(5):617–619, 2005. doi:10.1001/jama.293.5.617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Christiansen, M., and Nøhr, C., Undersøgelse af klinisk anvendelse af sundheds-it-systemer 2011 (trans: Informatics VCfH). Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Region-Syddanmark (2012) Strategi og arkitektur for Effektiv Systemadgang. Region Syddanmark

  33. Stanton, J. M., Stam, K. R., Mastrangelo, P., and Jolton, J., Analysis of end user security behaviors. Computers & Security 24(2):124–133, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2004.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., Bhargav-Spantzel, A., Tai, B.-L., Cook, J., and Eugene Schultz, E., Improving password security and memorability to protect personal and organizational information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(8):744–757, 2007. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Adams, A., and Sasse, M. A., Users are not the enemy. Commun ACM 42(12):40–46, 1999. doi:10.1145/322796.322806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Datatilsynet (2011) Datatilsynets Årsberetning. .

  37. Prosa (2008) It-kirkegården. http://www.prosa.dk/aktuelt/nyhed/artikel/it-kirkegaarden-1/. Accessed 1 May 2013

  38. Robertson A, Cresswell K, Takian A, Petrakaki D, Crowe S, Cornford T, Barber N, Avery A, Fernando B, Jacklin A, Prescott R, Klecun E, Paton J, Lichtner V, Quinn C, Ali M, Morrison Z, Jani Y, Waring J, Marsden K, Sheikh A (2010) Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation. BMJ 341. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4564

  39. Campbell D (2011) NHS told to abandon delayed IT project. The Guardian, Thursday 22 September 2011

  40. Dismantling the NHS National Programme for IT. (2011) Department of Health. http://mediacentre.dh.gov.uk/2011/09/22/dismantling-the-nhs-national-programme-for-it/. Accessed 12 Oct 2012

  41. Cresswell, K. M., Robertson, A., and Sheikh, A., Lessons learned from England’s national electronic health record implementation: implications for the international community. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, Miami, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Coiera, E., Building a National Health IT System from the middle out. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16(3):271–273, 2009. doi:10.1197/jamia.M3183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. National Electronic Health Record (NEHR) (2011). Ministry of Health: Singapore

  44. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Aktivitet på Private Sygehuse 2006–2010. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Copenhagen, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Den private sygehussektor i tal. En faktuel rapport om den private sygehussektor udarbejdet på baggrund af en spørgeskemaundersøgelse sommeren 2010 (2010). Brancheforeningen for Privathospitaler og Klinikker., Copenhagen

  46. Olesen, F., Hansen, R. P., and Vedsted, P., Delay in diagnosis: the experience in Denmark. British journal of cancer 101(Suppl 2):S5–8, 2009. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hansen, R., Vedsted, P., Sokolowski, I., Sondergaard, J., and Olesen, F., Time intervals from first symptom to treatment of cancer: a cohort study of 2,212 newly diagnosed cancer patients. BMC health services research 11(1):284, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vedsted, P., and Olesen, F., Are the serious problems in cancer survival partly rooted in gatekeeper principles? An ecologic study. British Journal of General Practice 61(589):e508–e512, 2011. doi:10.3399/bjgp11X588484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jyllands-Posten (2010) Politikere: Journalerne er blevet svigtet. Jyllands Posten, 05.12.10

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interests.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Kierkegaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kierkegaard, P. eHealth in Denmark: A Case Study. J Med Syst 37, 9991 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9991-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-013-9991-y

Keywords

Navigation