Skip to main content
Log in

The Relative Importance of Flower Color and Shape for the Foraging Monarch Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flowers attract and guide pollinators via a wide array of sensory stimuli, including colors, odors, textures, and even sounds. Bees are known to respond to and learn multimodal and multicomponent floral cues, whereas, historically, studies of learning in butterflies have focused on a single visual stimulus component, most often color. In this study, we examine whether Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) can learn to associate a compound visual stimulus, i.e., color and shape together, with a nectar reward. We also examine the relative importance of color and shape as cues for foraging butterflies. Our results indicate that within the visual modality, foraging Monarchs learn color more readily than shape. Monarchs, however, are capable of learning to associate shape with a sugar reward independent of color, and they may also be capable of learning the compound stimulus of color and shape in the context of foraging. We suggest that the hierarchical importance of cues is likely to vary depending on ecological context, and that although color may be most relevant for a nectar-foraging butterfly, shape may be a more useful cue for a butterfly searching for an oviposition substrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard RA, Papaj DR (1996) Learning of leaf shape by pipevine swallowtail butterflies: a test using artificial leaf models. J Insect Behav 9:961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Dobson HE (2003) Behavioral foraging responses by the butterfly Heliconius melpomene to Lantana camara floral scent. J Chem Ecol 29:2302–2318

    Google Scholar 

  • Arikawa K (2003) Spectral organization of the eye of a butterfly, Papilio. J Comp Physiol A 189:791–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balkenius A, Dacke M (2010) Flight behaviour of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta towards unimodal and multimodal targets. J Exp Biol 213:3741–3747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balkenius A, Rosén W, Kelber A (2006) The relative importance of olfaction and vision in a diurnal and a nocturnal hawkmoth. J Comp Physiol A 192:431–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth FG (1991) Insects and flowers: the biology of a partnership. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackiston D, Briscoe AD, Weiss MR (2011) Color vision and learning in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Nymphalidae). J Exp Biol 214:509–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe A, Chittka L (2001) The evolution of colour vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campan R, Lehrer M (2002) Discrimination of closed shapes by two species of bee, Apis mellifera and Megachile rotundata. J Exp Biol 205:559–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L (1996) Does bee colour vision predate the evolution of flower colour? Naturwissenschaften 83: 136–138 (with commentary in Discover Magazine).

  • Giurfa M, Dafni A, Neal PR (1999) Floral symmetry and its role in plant–pollinator systems. Int J Plant Sci 160:S41–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyret J, Raguso RA (2006) The role of mechanosensory input in flower handling efficiency and learning by Manduca sexta. J Exp Biol 209:1585–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyret J, Kelber A, Pfaff M, Raguso RA (2009) Flexible responses to visual and olfactory stimuli by foraging Manduca sexta: larval nutrition affects adult behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:2739–2745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GraphPad Prism (2010) Version 5.00 for Mac, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA. www.graphpad.com

  • Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobio 57:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandori I, Yamaki T, Okuyama S, Sakamoto N, Yokoi T (2009) Interspecific and intersexual learning rate differences in four butterfly species. J Exp Biol 212:3810–3816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelber A (1996) Colour learning in the hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. J Exp Biol 199:1127–1131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kevan PG, Lane MA (1985) Flower petal microtexture is a tactile cue for bees. PNAS 82:4750–4752

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinoshita M, Shimada NAOKO, Arikawa K (1999) Colour vision of the foraging swallowtail butterfly Papilio xuthus. J Exp Biol 202:95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulahci IG, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2008) Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumblebees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:797–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AS, Papaj DR (2011) “X” marks the spot: the possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Funct Ecol 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AS, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2011a) Forget-me-not: complex floral displays, inter-signal interactions, and pollinator cognition. Curr Zool 57:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AS, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2011b) Flowers help bees cope with uncertainty: signal detection and the function of floral complexity. J Exp Biol 214:113–121

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard AS, Masek P (2014) Multisensory integration of colors and scents: insights from bees and flowers. J Comp Physiol A 200:463–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay DA, Jones RE (1989) Leaf shape and the host finding behaviour of two ovipositing monophagous butterfly species. Ecol Entomol 14:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaj DR (1986) Conditioning of leaf-shape discrimination by chemical cues in the butterfly, Battus philenor. Anim Behav 34:1281–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso RA (2004) Flowers as sensory billboards: progress towards an integrated understanding of floral advertisement. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:434–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso RA (2008) Wake up and smell the roses: the ecology and evolution of floral scent. Ann Rev Ecol Evol S 39:549–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raguso RA, Willis MA (2005) Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by wild hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Anim Behav 69:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1978) Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200:1071–1073

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues D, Weiss MR (2012) Reward tracking and memory decay in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ethology 118:1122–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues D, Goodner BW, Weiss MR (2010) Reversal learning and risk averse foraging behavior in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ethology 116:270–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Helversen D, Holderied MW, von Helversen O (2003) Echoes of bat pollinated bell-shaped flowers: conspicuous for nectar-feeding bats? J Exp Biol 206:1025–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MR (1995) Associative color learning in a nymphalid butterfly. Ecol Entomol 20:298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MR (1997) Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim Behav 53:1043–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss MR, Papaj DR (2003) Colour learning in two behavioural contexts: how much can a butterfly keep in mind? Anim Behav 65:425–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis MA, Arbas EA (1991) Odor-modulated upwind flight of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta L. J Comp Physiol 169A:427–440

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

LCC was supported by a grant from Georgetown University’s Center for the Environment. LCR was supported by a grant to Georgetown University from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education Program. Lillian Power, Heather Mallory, Yi-jiun Jean Tsai, Caitlin Durkee, the Weiss lab group, and the DC Plant Insect Group participated in helpful discussions or commented on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha R. Weiss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cepero, L.C., Rosenwald, L.C. & Weiss, M.R. The Relative Importance of Flower Color and Shape for the Foraging Monarch Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Insect Behav 28, 499–511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-015-9519-z

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-015-9519-z

Keywords

Navigation