Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Problem Gambling Family Impacts: Development of the Problem Gambling Family Impact Scale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although family members of problem gamblers frequently present to treatment services, problem gambling family impacts are under-researched. The most commonly endorsed items on a new measure of gambling-related family impacts [Problem Gambling Family Impact Measure (PG-FIM: Problem Gambler version)] by 212 treatment-seeking problem gamblers included trust (62.5 %), anger (61.8 %), depression or sadness (58.7 %), anxiety (57.7 %), distress due to gambling-related absences (56.1 %), reduced quality time (52.4 %), and communication breakdowns (52.4 %). The PG-FIM (Problem Gambler version) was comprised of three factors: (1) financial impacts, (2) increased responsibility impacts, and (3) psychosocial impacts with good psychometric properties. Younger, more impulsive, non-electronic gaming machine (EGM) gamblers who had more severe gambling problems reported more financial impacts; non-EGM gamblers with poorer general health reported more increased responsibility impacts; and more impulsive non-EGM gamblers with more psychological distress and higher gambling severity reported more psychosocial impacts. The findings have implications for the development of interventions for the family members of problem gamblers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, D. A., & Cramer, S. (1993). Gambling attitudes and participation: A Midwestern survey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 247–265. doi:10.1007/BF01015921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, G., & Slade, T. (2001). Interpreting scores of the Kessler psychological distress scale (K10). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, 494–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00310.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babor, T. F., Higgins-Biddle, J. C., Saunders, J. B., & Monteiro, M. G. (2001). The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary care. Geneva: World Health Organisation. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2001/who_msd_msb_01.6a.pdf.

  • Bellringer, M., Pulford, J., Abbott, M., DeSouza, R., & Clarke, D. (2008). Problem gambling: Barriers to help seeking behaviours. Auckland: Gambling Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology. http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/indexmh/problemgamblingresearch-implementation0407-barriers.

  • Bowling, A. (2005). Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 342–345. doi:10.1136/jech.2004.021204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, K. A., DeBenedetti, A. F., Volk, R. J., Williams, E. C., Frank, D., et al. (2007). AUDIT-C as a brief screen for alcohol misuse in primary care. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 31(7), 1208–1217. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00403.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, F. B., & Smith, B. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 138–167. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, D. R., Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomas, S. A. (2014). Gambling participation and problem gambling severity in a stratified random survey: Findings from the second social and economic impact study of gambling in Tasmania. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi:10.1007/s10899-014-9495-9.

  • Clifford, G. (2008). The evolution of problem gambling helplines. In M. Zangeneh, A. Blaszczynski, & N. Turner (Eds.), In the pursuit of winning (pp. 291–312). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, B. R., Thomas, S. A., Jackson, A. C., & Thomason, N. (2001). Partners of problem gamblers who present for counselling: Demographic profile and presenting problems. Journal of Family Studies, 7, 208–216. doi:10.5172/jfs.7.2.208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire, P., Oster, C., & Carrig, H. (2001). The experience of pervasive loss: Children and young people living in a family where parental gambling is pathological. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17, 23–45. doi:10.1023/A:1014536315167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Zhou, Y. (2005). Effectiveness of the derived alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT-C) in screening for alcohol use disorders and risk drinking in the US general population. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(5), 844–854. doi:10.1097/01.ALC.0000164374.32229.A2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vellis, R. F. (1992). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. A., Wiggers, J., Leeder, S. R., & Sanson-Fisher, R. W. (1989). General practitioners’ detection of patients’ smoking status. The Medical Journal of Australia, 150(8), 420–426. doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0228-7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A. (2013). The cognitive-behavioural treatment of female problem gambling. In D. Richard, A. Blaszczynski, & L. Nower (Eds.), The Wiley–Blackwell handbook of disordered gambling (pp. 225–250). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Suomi, A., Lavis, T., Koziol-McLain, J., Thomas, S. A., et al. (2014a). Problem gambling and family violence: Prevalence and patterns in treatment-seekers populations. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1713–1717. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A., Jackson, A. C., Thomas, S. A., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Children at risk of developing problem gambling. Melbourne: Gambling Research Australia. http://www.gamblingresearch.org.au/home/research/gra+research+reports/children+at+risk+of+developing+problem+gambling+%282010%29.

  • Dowling, N. A., Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., & Jackson, A. C. (2014b). The impacts of problem gambling on concerned significant others accessing web-based counselling. Addictive Behaviors, 39(8), 1253–1257. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the “crack-cocaine” of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45. doi:10.1111/j.13600443.2004.00962.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2009). The family functioning of female pathological gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 7(1), 29–44. doi:10.1007/s11469-007-9126-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, N. A., Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Cockman, S., et al. (2014). Problem gambling and intimate partner violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. doi:10.1177/1524838014561269.

  • Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian problem gambling index: Final report. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54. doi:10.1007/s10862-008-9102-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., Scarfe, A., & Bellringer, P. (1999). The UK National Telephone Gambling Helpline: Results on the first year of operation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 83–90. doi:10.1023/A:1023071113879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hing, N., Tiyce, M., Holdsworth, L., & Nuske, E. (2013). All in the family: Help-seeking by significant others of problem gamblers. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 11, 1–13. doi:10.1007/s11469-012-9423-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Shead, N. W., & Makarchuk, K. (2007a). Relationship satisfaction and psychological distress among concerned significant others of pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195, 65–71. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000252382.47434.a6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Makarchuk, K., Skinner, W., & Vincent, S. (2007b). Minimal treatment approaches for concerned significant others of problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 215–230. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9052-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalischuk, R., Nowatzki, N., Cardwell, K., Klein, K., & Solowoniuk, J. (2006). Problem gambling and its impact on families: A literature review. International Gambling Studies, 6, 31–60. doi:10.1080/14459790600644176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Colpe, L. J., Hiripi, E., Mroczek, D. K., Normand, S. L., et al. (2002). Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine, 32(6), 959–976. doi:10.1017/S0033291702006074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C., Barker, P. R., Colpe, L. J., Epstein, J. F., Gfroerer, J. C., Hiripi, E., et al. (2003). Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 184–189. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.2.184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. C., Dugosh, K. L., Benishek, L. A., & Harrington, V. M. (2005). The significant other checklist: Measuring the problems experienced by family members of drug users. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 29–47. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makarchuk, K., Hodgins, D. C., & Peden, N. (2002). Development of a brief intervention for concerned significant others of problem gamblers. Addictive Disorders and their Treatment, 1, 126–134. doi:10.1097/00132576-200211000-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring problem gambling: Assessment of three prevalence screens. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147–174. doi:10.1080/14459790600927845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, B., Herrman, H., Hawthorne, G., Pinzone, T., & Evert, H. (2000). Australian WHOQoL instruments: User’s manual and interpretation guide. Melbourne: Australian WHOQOL Field Study Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O’Neil, M. (2005). Problem gambling and harm: Towards a national definition. Adelaide: South Australia Centre for Economic Studies. https://www.adelaide.edu.au/saces/gambling/publications/ProblemGamblingAndHarmTowardNationalDefinition.pdf.

  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oei, T. P. S., & Raylu, N. (2004). Familial influence on offspring gambling: A cognitive mechanism for transmission of gambling behavior in families. Psychological Medicine, 34(7), 1279–1288. doi:10.1017/S0033291704003150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J., Templeton, L., Velleman, R., & Copello, A. (2005). Family members of relatives with alcohol, drug and gambling problems: A set of standardized questionnaires for assessing stress, coping and strain. Addiction, 100, 1611–1624. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01178.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patford, J. (2007). The yoke of care: How parents and parents-in-law experience, understand and respond to adult children’s gambling problems. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 13, 59–68. doi:10.1071/PY07039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2010). Gambling, report no. 50. Canberra: Author.

  • Rodda, S. N., & Lubman, D. I. (2014). Characteristics of gamblers using a national online counselling service for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 30(2), 277–289. doi:10.1007/s10899-012-9352-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodda, S., Lubman, D. I., Dowling, N. A., & McCann, T. V. (2013). Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3, 12. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rychtarik, R., & McGillicuddy, N. (2006). Preliminary evaluation of a coping skills training program for those with a pathological-gambling partner. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22, 165–178. doi:10.1007/s10899-006-9008-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. E. K., & Riessman, C. K. (1980). The development of the Impact on Family Scale: Preliminary findings. Medical Care, 18, 465–472. doi:10.1097/00005650-198004000-00010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behaviour and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764–1778. doi:10.1037/a0012955.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, A., Jackson, A. C., Dowling, N. A., Lavis, T., Patford, J., Thomas, S. A., et al. (2013). Problem gambling and family violence: Family member reports of prevalence, family impacts and family coping. Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health, 3(13), 1–15. doi:10.1186/2195-3007-3-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, J., Romild, U., & Shepherdson, E. (2013). The concerned significant others of people with gambling problems in a national representative sample in Sweden: A one-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health, 13, 1087. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-1087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vitaro, F., Wanner, B., Brendgen, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Offspring of parents with gambling problems: Adjustment problems and explanatory mechanisms. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 535–553. doi:10.1007/s10899-008-9096-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J., & Sherbourne, D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–483. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3765916.

  • Wenzel, H. G., Oren, A., & Bakken, I. J. (2008). Gambling problems in the family: A stratified probability sample study of prevalence and reported consequences. BMC Public Health, 8, 412. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-8-412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Who ASSIST Working Group. (2002). The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): Development, reliability, and feasibility. Addiction, 97, 1183–1194. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00185.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. (2007). Online guidance, advice and support for problem gamblers and concerned relatives and friends: An evaluation of the GamAid pilot service. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 35, 373–389. doi:10.1080/03069880701593540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This manuscript presents secondary analysis of data from research on problem gambling and family violence funded by the Australian Research Council (Linkage Grant LP 0989331) with the Office for Problem Gambling, South Australia and Drummond Street Services, Victoria as industry partners; and the Problem Gambling Research and Treatment Centre at the University of Melbourne. The research team would like to acknowledge the effort of the participating agencies in Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania, and the clients who participated in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Dowling.

Appendix: The Problem Gambling Family Impact Measures

Appendix: The Problem Gambling Family Impact Measures

Problem Gambler Version

Instruction

In the past 3 months, how often have family members experienced any of the following problems as a result of your gambling?

  1. 1.

    Financial hardship

  2. 2.

    Reduced income for household running costs (e.g., food, rent, bills)

  3. 3.

    A lack of money for family projects (e.g., major purchases, holidays)

  4. 4.

    Taking over decision making in the home

  5. 5.

    Taking over financial responsibility in the home

  6. 6.

    Distress or upset due to my continued gambling-related absences

  7. 7.

    A breakdown in communication with me

  8. 8.

    Less quality time with me

  9. 9.

    Feelings of depression or sadness

  10. 10.

    Feelings of anxiety

  11. 11.

    Feelings of anger towards me

  12. 12.

    An inability to trust me

  13. 13.

    Increased arguments over my gambling

  14. 14.

    Family violence or conflict

Family Member Version

Instruction

In the past 3 months, how often have you and family members experienced any of the following problems as a result of your family member(s) gambling?

  1. 1.

    Financial hardship

  2. 2.

    Reduced income for household running costs (e.g., food, rent, bills)

  3. 3.

    A lack of money for family projects (e.g., major purchases, holidays)

  4. 4.

    Taking over decision making in the home

  5. 5.

    Taking over financial responsibility in the home

  6. 6.

    Distress or upset due to their continued gambling-related absences

  7. 7.

    A breakdown in communication with them

  8. 8.

    Less quality time with them

  9. 9.

    Feelings of depression or sadness

  10. 10.

    Feelings of anxiety

  11. 11.

    Feelings of anger towards them

  12. 12.

    An inability to trust them

  13. 13.

    Increased arguments over their gambling

  14. 14.

    Family violence or conflict

Response Options

(0) Never, (1) Rarely, (2) Sometimes, (3) Often

Subscales

Financial impacts (Items 1, 2, 3); increased responsibility impacts (Items 4, 5, 10); Psychosocial impacts (Items 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dowling, N.A., Suomi, A., Jackson, A.C. et al. Problem Gambling Family Impacts: Development of the Problem Gambling Family Impact Scale. J Gambl Stud 32, 935–955 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9582-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-015-9582-6

Keywords

Navigation