Skip to main content
Log in

Introducing ‘Simple Variable Selection (SVS) Approach’ for Improving the Quantitative Accuracy of Chemometric Assisted Fluorimetric Estimations of Dilute Aqueous Mixtures

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Fluorescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excitation emission matrix fluorescence (EEMF) spectroscopy is a multiparametric fluorescence technique where the fluorescence intensity of a fluorophore is a function of excitation wavelength, emission wavelength and its concentration. The manual analysis of large volume of highly correlated EEMF data sets towards developing a calibration model for quantifying each fluorophores present in multifluorophoric mixtures is a difficult and time-consuming task. Over the years, Partial least square (PLS) algorithm has found its application towards providing swift and efficient analyses of large volumes of highly correlated spectral data sets. The PLS assisted EEMF spectroscopy has been successfully used towards quantifying the fluorophores in multifluorophoric mixtures without involving any pre-separation. However, the accuracy and robustness of developed calibration model can be significantly improved provided PLS analysis is carried out on the analytically relevant EEMF spectral variables. In the present work, a variable selection method baptized as simple variable selection (SVS) approach is introduced that provides a simple and computationally economical means of identifying the useful spectral variables for subsequent PLS analysis. The proposed SVS approach is successfully validated by analyzing the complex EEMF data sets of multifluorophoric mixtures of consisting of multifluorophoric mixtures of biological relevance. The proposed approach is found to provide a simple, swift and efficient means for developing a robust PLS assisted EEMF spectroscopy based calibration model for simultaneous quantification of various fluorophores present in multifluorophoric mixtures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rho JH, Stuart JL (1978) Automated three-dimensional plotter for fluorescence measurements. Anal Chem 50:620–625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Freegarde M, Hatchard CG, Parker CA (1971) Oil spilt at sea: its identification, determination, and ultimate fate. Lab Pr 20:35–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Warner IM, Callis JB, Davidson ER, Goutermann M, Christian GD (1975) Fluorescence analysis: a new approach. Anal Lett 8:665–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar K, Tarai M, Mishra AK (2017) Unconventional steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy as an analytical technique for analyses of complex-multifluorophoric mixtures. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 97:216–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar K, Mishra AK (2013) Analysis of dilute aqueous multifluorophoric mixtures using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (EEMF) and total synchronous fluorescence (TSF) spectroscopy: a comparative evaluation. Talanta 117:209–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kramer R (1998) Chemometric techniques for quantitative analysis. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn WJ (1984) The collinearity problem in linear regression. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses. SIAM J Sci and Stat Comp 5:735–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geladi P, Kowalski B (1986) Partial least square regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 185:1–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorber A, Wangen LE, Kowalski BR (1987) A theoretical foundation for the PLS algorithm. J Chemom 1:19–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Varmuza K, Filzmoser P (2008) Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis in chemometrics. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sorol N, Arancibia E, Bortolato SA, Olivieri AC (2010) Visible/near infrared-partial least-squares analysis of brix in sugar cane juice a test field for variable selection methods. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 102:100–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Goicoechea HC, Olivier AC (2003) A new family of genetic algorithms for wavelength interval selection in multivariate analytical spectroscopy. J Chemom 17:338–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehmood T, Liland KH, Snipen L, Sæbø S (2012) A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 118(2012):62–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaffer RE, Small GW (1996) Genetic algorithm-based protocol for coupling digital filtering and partial least-squares regression: application to the near-infrared analysis of glucose in biological matrices. Anal Chem 68:2663–2675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding Q, Small GW (1998) Genetic algorithm-based wavelength selection for the near-infrared determination of glucose in biological matrixes: initialization strategies and effects of spectral resolution. Anal Chem 70:4472–4479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bangalore AS, Shaffer RE, Small GW (1996) Genetic algorithm based method for selecting wavelengths and model size for use with partial least-squares regression: application to near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal Chem 68:4200–4212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiaobo Z, Jiewen Z, Hanpin M, Jiyong S, Xiaopin Y, Yanxiao L (2010) Genetic algorithm interval partial least squares regression combined successive projections algorithm for variable selection in near-infrared quantitative analysis of pigment in cucumber leaves. Appl Spectrosc 64:786–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leardi R, González AL (1998) Genetic algorithms applied to feature selection in PLS regression: how and when to use them. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 41:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujiwara K, Sawada H, Kano M (2012) Input variable selection for PLS modelling using nearest correlation spectral clustering. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 118:109–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arakawa M, Yamashita Y, Funatsu K (2010) Genetic algorithm-based wavelength selection method for spectral calibration, J. Chemom 25:10–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chong IG, Jun CH (2005) Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 78:103–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rajalahti T, Arnebergc R, Bervend FS, Myhra KM, Ulvikd RJ, Kvalheimg OM (2009) Biomarker discovery in mass spectral profiles by means of selectivity ratio plot. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 95:35–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hocking RR (1976) The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 32:1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar K, Mishra AK (2012) Application of parallel factor analysis to total synchronous fluorescence spectrum of dilute multifluorophoric solutions: addressing the issue of lack of trilinearity in total synchronous fluorescence data set. Anal Chim Acta 755:37–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wise BM, Gallaghar NB, Bro R, Shaver JM (2006) PLS_Toolbox 4.0. Eigen vector research

  26. Kumar K, Mishra AK (2012) Quantification of ethanol in ethanol petrol and biodiesel in biodiesel-diesel blends using fluorescence spectroscopy and multivariate methods. J Fluoresc 22:339–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keshav Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, K. Introducing ‘Simple Variable Selection (SVS) Approach’ for Improving the Quantitative Accuracy of Chemometric Assisted Fluorimetric Estimations of Dilute Aqueous Mixtures. J Fluoresc 28, 1163–1171 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-018-2280-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-018-2280-x

Keywords

Navigation