Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to estimate the preferences of the Italian society towards equity in order to verify whether preferences (i) have changed across the years, and (ii) can be related to specific socio-demographic characteristics. Introducing equity concerns in the implementation of economic policies is a fundamental problem faced by both economists and policy makers. This paper uses a social welfare function à la Jorgenson and Slesnick to estimate society’s aversion towards inequality by implement in a voting scheme for compiling individuals’ equity preferences in to a social choice by majority rule. The results show that preferences are highly polarized toward a low and a high concern for equity aversion and that this concern is significantly related with several sociodemographic characteristics. Among them, income plays an important role with richer people tending to favor less equity. Results also show that preferences towards equity have changed across the years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E.: Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities, NBER Working Paper No. 8267, 2001
Alesina, A., Di Tella, R. and MacCulloch, R.: Inequality and happiness: Are Europeans and Americans different?, NBER Working Paper No. 8198, 2001.
Amiel, Y., Creedy, J. and Hurn, S.: Measuring attitudes towards inequality, Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (1999),83–96.
Arrow, K.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1963.
Atella, V.: Quinto Rapporto CNEL sulla Distribuzione e Redistribuzione del Reddito in Italia e in Europa 1998–1999, Documenti CNEL, Roma, 2000.
Atella V., Menon, M. and Perali, F.: Estimation of unit values incross sections without quantity information and implications for demand and welfare analysis, In: C. Dagum and G. Ferrari (eds.), Household Behavior, Equivalence Scales, Welfare and Poverty, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2003.
Atkinson, A.B., Lee, R. and Smeeding, T.: Income distribution in european countries, In: A. Atkinson (ed.), Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 1995.
Barten, A.P.: Family composition, prices, and expenditure patterns, In: P. Hart, L. Mills and J.K. Whitaker (eds.), Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, Butterworth Publishing, London, 1964.
Benassy, J.-P.: Developments in non-walrasian economics and the microeconomic foundations of macroeconomics, In: W. Hildenbrand (ed.), Advances in Economic Theory, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, 1982.
Bénabou, R. and Ok, E.:Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis, Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001), 447–487.
Black, D.: On the rationale of group decision making, Journal of Political Economy 56 (1948), 23–34.
Blackorby, C. Boyce, R. and Russell, R.: Estimation of demand systems generated by the Gorman polar form: A generalization of the S-branch utility tree, Econometrica 46 (1978), 345–363.
Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D.: Money metric utility: A harmless normalization?, Journal of Economic Theory 46 (1988),120–129.
Blackorby, C. and Donaldson, D.: Adult-equivalence scales, interpersonal comparisons of well-being, and applied welfare economics, In: J. Elster and J.E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
Blundell, R. and Lewbel, A.: The information content of equivalence scales, Journal of Econometrics 50 (1991), 1–19.
Buccola, S.T. and Sukume, C.: Social welfare of alternative controlled-price policies, Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (1993), 86–96.
Christiansen, V. and Jensen, E.S.: Implicit social preferences in the norwegian system of social preferences, Journal of Public Economics 10 (1978), 217–245.
Coggins, J. and Perali, F.: Voting for equity: Estimating society’s preferences toward inequality, Mimeo, University of Verona, 2002.
Corneo, J. and Grüner, H.P.: Individual preferences for political redistribution, Journal of Public Economics, 2000.
D’Aspremont, C. and Gevers, L.: Equity and the informational basis of collective choice, Review of Economic Studies 44 (1977), 199–209.
Deaton, A.S. and Muellbauer, J.: An almost ideal demand system, American Economic Review 70 (1980), 312–326.
Downs, A.: An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row Publishers, Inc., New York, 1957.
Fritzell, J.: Still different? Income distribution in the nordic countries in a european comparison, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper No. 238, 1994.
Gardner, R.: λ-transfer value and fixed-price equilibrium in two-sided markets, In: P.K. Pattanaik and M. Salles (eds.), Social Choice and Welfare, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
Gorman, W.M.: Tricks with utility functions, In: M.M. Artis and A.R. Nobay (eds.), Essays in Economic Analysis: Proceedings of the 1975 AUTE Conference, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.
Hammond, P.J.: Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made, In: J. Elster and J.E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.
Hirschman, A.O.: The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development, with a mathematical appendix by Michael Rothschild, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (1973), 544–566.
Jorgenson, D.W.: Aggregate consumer behavior and the measurement of social welfare, Econometrica 58 (1990), 1007–1037.
Jorgenson, D.W.: Welfare - Measuring Social Welfare, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1997.
Jorgenson, D.W. and Slesnick, D.T.: Individual and social cost of living indices, In: W.E. Diewert and C. Montmarquetts (eds.), Price Level Measurement, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, 1983.
Jorgenson, D.W. and Slesnick, D.T.:Aggregate consumer behavior and household equivalence scales, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 5 (1987), 219–232.
Jorgenson, D.W and Slesnick, D.: Inequality and the standard of living indexes, In: W.E. Diewert (ed.), Price Level Measurement, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.
Lewbel, A.: A unified approach to incorporating demographic or other effects into demand systems, Review of Economic Studies 52 (1985), 1–18.
Lewbel, A.: Household equivalence scales and welfare comparisons, Journal of Public Economics 39 (1989), 377–391.
Lewbel, A.: Consumer demand system and household equivalence scales, In: M.H. Pesaran and P. Schmidt (eds.), Handobook of Applied Econometrics, Vol. II: Microeconomics, Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
Meltzer, A. and Richards, S.: A rational theory of the size of government, Journal of Political Economy 89 (1981), 914–927.
Pollak, R.A. and Wales, T.J.: Demographic variables in demand analysis, Econometrica 49 (1981), 1533–1551.
Pollak, R.A. and Wales, T.J., Demand System Specification and Estimation, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
Roberts, K.W.S.: Interpersonal comparability and social choice theory, Review of Economic Studies 47 (1980), 421–439.
Roberts, K.W.S.: Possibility theorems with interpersonally comparable welfare levels, Review of Economic Studies 47 (1980), 409–420.
Romer, T.: Individual welfare, majority voting and the properties of a linear income tax, Journal of Public Economics 7 (1975),163–188.
Rossi, N.: Secondo rapporto CNEL sulla distribuzione e redistribuzione del reddito in Italia 1993–1994, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1994.
Rossi, N.: Quarto rapporto CNEL sulla distribuzione e redistribuzione del reddito in Italia 1996–1997, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1998.
Sen, A.K.: Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1970.
Sen, A.K.:On Economic Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1973.
Sen, A.K.: Personal utilities and public judgements: Or what’s wrong with welfare economics, Economic Journal 89 (1979), 537–558.
Sen, A.K.: The possibility of social choice, American Economic Review 89 (1999), 349–378.
Slesnick, D. Empirical approaches to the measurement of welfare, Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1998), 2108–2165.
Shurcke, M. Preferences for inequality East vs. West, Innocenti Working Paper No. 89, UNICEF Innocenti research Centre, Florence, 2001.
Stern, N.: Welfare weights and the elasticity of the marginal valuation of income, In: M. Artis and R. Nobay (eds.), Studies in Modern Economic Analysis, Basil Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atella, V., Coggins, J. & Perali, F. Aversion to inequality in Italy and its determinants. J Econ Inequal 2, 117–144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-4386-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-005-4386-z