Abstract
Human rights create a protective zone around persons and allow them the opportunity to further their own valued personal projects without interference from others. In this paper we apply the concept of human rights to people with an intellectual disability. First we briefly analyze the concept of human rights, their structure, and justification. Second, we directly apply our model of human rights to persons with an intellectual disability and argue that it has the resources to bridge the perceived gap between rights and needs and to offer practitioners ethically defensible practice guidance. We supplement this abstract analysis with a case example. Finally we conclude with some reflections on the future of a human rights viewpoint in the arena of intellectual disability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baylies, C. (2002). Disability and the notion of human development: Questions of rights and capabilities. Disability and Society, 7, 725–739.
Churchill, R. P. (2006). Human rights and global diversity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal human rights in theory and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Cornell University Press.
Drewitt, A. Y. (1999). Social rights and disability: The language of ‘rights’ in community care politics. Disability & Society, 14, 115–128.
Emerson, E. (1992). What is normalisation? In H. Brown, & H. Smith (Eds.) Normalisation: A reader for the nineties (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.
Freeden, M. (1991). Rights. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Freeman, M. (2002). Human rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Gewirth, A. (1981). Reason and morality. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Gewirth, A. (1996). The community of rights. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Gewirth, A. (1998). Self-fulfillment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Griffiths, D. M., et al. (2003). Human rights and persons with intellectual disabilities: An action-research approach for community-based organizational self-evaluation. Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 10, 25–42.
Handley, P. (2000). Trouble in paradise—a disabled person’s right to the satisfaction of a self-defined need: Some conceptual and practical problems. Disability & Society, 16, 313–325.
Herr, S. S., Gostin, L. O., & Koh, H. H. (2003) (Eds.). The human rights of persons with intellectual disabilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hohfeld, W. N. (1919). Fundamental legal conceptions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hudson, B. (1988). Do people with a mental handicap have rights? Disability, handicap, & Society, 3, 227–237.
Li, A. (2006). Ethics, human rights, and culture. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
Litvak, & Enders, (2001). Support systems: the interface between individuals and environments. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.) The handbook of disability studies (pp. 711–733). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lohrmann-O’Rourke, S., & Browder, D. (1998). Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 103(2), 146–161.
Luckasson, R., Coulter, D., Polloway, E., Reiss, S., Schalock, R., Snell, M., Spitalink, D., & Stark, J. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification and systems of supports (9th ed.). Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Luckasson, R., Schalock, R., Spitalnik, D., Spreat, S., Tasse, M., Snell, M., Coulter, D., Borthwick-Duffy, S., & Reeve, A. (2002). Mental retardation: definition, classification and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Luckasson, R., & Spitalnik, D. (1994). Political and pragmatic shifts of the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation. In V. Bradley, J. Ashbaugh, & B. Blaney (Eds.) Creating individual supports for people for developmental disabilities: A mandate for change at many levels (pp. 81–95). Baltimore MD: Brookes.
MENCAP (2006). Death by indifference. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from http://www.mencap.org.uk/html/campaigns/deathbyindifference/reports.asp.
Munford, R., & Sullivan, M. (1997). Social theories of disability: The insurrection of subjugated knowledges. In P. O’Brien, & R. Murray (Eds.) Human services: Towards partnership and support (pp. 17–33). Palmerston North: Dunmore.
Nickel, J. W. (2007). Making sense of human rights (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, and species membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
O’Brien, J. (1987). A guide to lifestyle planning: Using the activities catalogue to integrate services and national support systems. In B. Wilcox, & G. Bellamy (Eds.) The activities catalogue: An alternative curriculum for youth and adults with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
Oliver, M. (1990). The policies of disablement. London: Macmillan.
Orend, B. (2002). Human rights: Concept and context. Ontario, Canada: Broadview.
Rescher, N. (1993). A system of pragmatic idealism. Vol II: The validity of values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rioux, M., & Carbert, A. (2003). Human rights and disability: The international context. Journal on Developmental disabilities, 10, 1–13.
Ritchie, P., Sanderson, H., Kilbane, J., & Routledge, M. (2003). People, plans and practicalities: Achieving change through person-centred planning. Edinburgh: SHS Trust.
Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Stainton, T. (2007). Case management in a rights-based environment: Structure, context and roles. In C. Bigby, C. Fyffe, & E. Ozanne (Eds.) Planning and support for people with intellectual disabilities: Issues for case managers and other professionals (pp. 90–107). London: Kingsley.
Stancliffe, R., Abery, B., & Smith, J. (2000). Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: Beyond living size and type. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105(6), 431–454.
Stratford, B. (1991). Human rights and equal opportunities for people with mental handicap—With particular reference to downs syndrome. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 38, 3–13.
Talbott, W. J. (2005). Which rights should be universal?. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, J., Hughes, C., Schalock, R., Silverman, W., Tasse, M., Bryant, B., Craig, E., & Campbell, E. (2002). Integrating supports in assessment and planning. Mental Retardation, 40(5), 390–405.
United Nations (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. In J. P. Martin, & R. Rangaswamy (Eds.) Twenty-five human rights documents. New York: Columbia University for the Study of Human Rights.
United Nations (1994). UN standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York, NY: United Nations.
United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York, NY: United Nations.
Young, D. A., & Quibell, R. (2000). Why rights are never enough: Rights, intellectual disability and understanding. Disability & Society, 15, 747–764.
Ward, T., & Birgden, A. (2007). Human rights and correctional clinical practice. Aggressive and Violent Behavior, 12, 628–643.
Warren, M. A. (1997). Moral status. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Wehmeyer, M. (1998). Self-determination and individuals with significant disabilities: examining meanings and misinterpretations. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 23(1), 5–16.
Wehmeyer, M., & Metzler, C. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The national consumer survey. Mental Retardation, 33(2), 111–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ward, T., Stewart, C. Putting Human Rights into Practice with People with an Intellectual Disability. J Dev Phys Disabil 20, 297–311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-008-9098-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-008-9098-4