Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-channel electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive method to simultaneously measure cardiac output and individual arterial limb flow in patients with cardiovascular disease

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiac output is the fundamental determinant of peripheral blood flow however; optimal regional tissue perfusion is ultimately dependant on the integrity of the arterial conduits that transport flow. A complete understanding of tissue perfusion requires knowledge of both cardiac and peripheral blood flow. Existing noninvasive devices do not simultaneously assess the cardiac and peripheral circulations. Multi-channel electrical bioimpedance (MEB) measures cardiac output and peripheral flow simultaneously.

Objectives

Assessment of the accuracy of MEB to measure cardiac output in patients with clinical heart failure (group 1) and to measure regional arterial limb flow in patients with exertional leg pain clinically thought to have peripheral arterial disease (group 2).

Methods

Cardiac output was measured by MEB in 44 patients with moderate to severe clinical heart failure (group 1) and was compared to a cardiac output measured by 2D-Echo Doppler. Peripheral blood flow (regional ankle and arm flow) was measured by MEB in another group of 25 patients with exertional leg pain clinically thought to be claudication (group 2). The MEB ankle/arm flow ratio (AAI index) was then compared to a conventional ankle/brachial pressure ratio (ABI index).

Results

There was excellent correlation between the mean cardiac index by MEB (2.01 l/min/m2) and by 2D-Echo Doppler (2.06 l/min/m2) and bias and precision was 0.05 (2.4%) and ±0.48 l/min/m2 (±23%), respectively. The correlation was maintained for each measurement over a wide range of cardiac indices. There was good correlation between AAI and ABI measurements (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

MEB accurately measures cardiac output in patients with moderate to severe clinical heart failure and accurately measures regional arterial limb flow in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease. A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Langer RD, Fronek A. The epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease: importance of identifying the population at risk. Vasc Med. 1997;2(3):221–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, Krook SH, Hunninghake DB, Comerota AJ, Walsh ME, McDermott MM, Hiatt WR. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 2001; 286(11): 1317–1324.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, Feigelson HS, Klauber MR, McCann TJ, et al. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(6):381–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheenan P. Peripheral arterial disease in patients with diabetes. Peripheral vascular disease-basic diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Criqui MH, Ninomiya JK, Wingard DL, Ji M, Fronek A. Progression of peripheral arterial disease predicts cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(21):1736–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanley AW Jr, Herald JW, Athanasuleas CL, Jacob SC, Sims SW, Bartolucci AA, et al. Multi-channel electrical bioimpedance: a new noninvasive method to simultaneously measure cardiac and peripheral blood flow. J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21(6):345–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kubicek WG, Karnegis JN, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Mattson RH. Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiac output system. Aerosp Med. 1966;37(12):1208–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kubicek WG, From AH, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Castaneda A, Lillehei RC, et al. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive means to monitor cardiac function. J Assoc Adv Med Instrum. 1970;4(2):79–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kubicek WG, Kottke J, Ramos MU, Patterson RP, Witsoe DA, Labree JW, Remole W, Layman TE, Schoening H, Garamela JT. The Minnesota impedance cardiograph- theory and applications. Biomed Eng 1974; 9(9): 410–416.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstein DP. Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. Crit Care Med. 1986;14(10):898–901.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Denniston JC, Maher JT, Reeves JT, Cruz JC, Cymerman A, Grover RF. Measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance at rest and during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40(1):91–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goldstein DS, Cannon ROIII, Zimlichman R, Keiser HR. Clinical evaluation of impedance cardiography. Clin Physiol. 1986;6(3):235–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, Cohen AJ, Miller H, Goor D, et al. Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest. 2004;125(4):1431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker LE. Principles of impedance technique. IEEE Eng Med Biol. 1989;3:11–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dittmann H, Voelker W, Karsch KR, Seipel L. Influence of sampling site and flow area on cardiac output measurements by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10(4):818–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Henry WL, DeMaria A, Gramiak R, King DL, Kisslo JA, Popp RL, Sahn DJ, Schiller NB, Tajik A, Teichholz LE, Weyman AE. Report of the American society of echocardiography committee on nomenclature and standards in two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1980; 62(2): 212–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. 1984;70(3):425–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Quinones MA, Waggoner AD, Reduto LA, Nelson JG, Young JB, Winters WL Jr, et al. A new, simplified and accurate method for determining ejection fraction with two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation. 1981;64(4):744–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American society of echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2(5):358–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hatle L, Angelsen B. Doppler ultrasound in cardiology, 2nd ed. Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia, 1985.

  22. Strandness DE, Jr., Bell JW. Peripheral vascular Disease: Diagnosis and objective evaluation using a mercury strain gauge. Ann Surg 1965;161:Suppl-35.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bernstein EF, Fronek A. Current status of noninvasive tests in the diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease. Surg Clin North Am. 1982;62(3):473–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mauney KA. Peripheral vascular disease: Basic diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2004. p. 215–29.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marik PE, Pendelton JE, Smith R. A comparison of hemodynamic parameters derived from transthoracic electrical bioimpedance with those parameters obtained by thermodilution and ventricular angiography. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(9):1545–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yakimets J, Jensen L. Evaluation of impedance cardiography: comparison of NCCOM3-R7 with Fick and thermodilution methods. Heart Lung. 1995;24(3):194–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantine L. Athanasuleas MD.

Additional information

Stanley AWH, Herald JW, Athanasuleas CL, Jacob SC, Bartolucci AA, Tsoglin AN. Multi-channel electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive method to simultaneously measure cardiac output and individual arterial limb flow in patients with cardiovascular disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stanley, A.W.H., Herald, J.W., Athanasuleas, C.L. et al. Multi-channel electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive method to simultaneously measure cardiac output and individual arterial limb flow in patients with cardiovascular disease. J Clin Monit Comput 23, 243–251 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-009-9189-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-009-9189-5

Keywords

Navigation