Abstract
Purpose
Although clinical information systems (CISs) have been available and implemented in many Intensive care Units (ICUs) for more than a decade, there is little objective evidence of their impact on the quality of care and staff perceptions. This study was performed to compare time spent charting with pen and paper patient data versus time spent with the new electronic CIS and to evaluate staff perceptions of a CIS in an ICU.
Materials and Methods
Time spent every day was calculated for each patient, for 7 days, for recording on the paper vital signs and physician therapeutic orders and time spent for computing fluid balance and scores. This time was then compared with time required to make the same activities by means of CIS, 10 months after its introduction in ICU. Four years after the installation of CIS, a questionnaire was given to all staff attending to the ICU to evaluate their opinions of the CIS.
Results
The CIS took less staff time to record common ICU data than paper records (3 ± 2 minutes/day versus 37 ± 7 minutes/day respectively, P< 0.001). Perceptions of the CIS were that computers promoted an improving charting quality.
Conclusions
The implementation of a CIS was associated with a reduced time spent for daily activity and a positive medical and nursing staff perception.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Varon J, Marik PE. 2002 Clinical information systems and the electronic medical record in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 8:616–624
Fraenkel DJ, Cowie M, Daley P. 2003 Quality benefits of an intensive care clinical information system. Crit Care Med 31:120–125
Tufo HM, Speidel JJ. 1971 Problems with medical records. Med Care 9:509
Hsia DC, Krushat WM, Fagan AB., et al. 1988 Accuracy of diagnostic coding for medicare patients under the prospective-payment system. N Engl J Med 318:352
Korpman RA, Lincoln TL. 1988 The computer-stored medical record: For whom?. JAMA 259:3454
Pierpont GL, Thilgen D. 1995 Effect of computerized charting on nursing activity in intensive care. Crit Care Med 23:1067
Tolbert SH, Pertuz AE. 1977 Study shown how computerization affects nursing activities in ICU. Hospitals 51:79
Bradshaw KE, Gardner RM, Clemmer TP, et al. 1984 Physician decision-making evaluation of data used in a computerized ICU. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1:81
Brown SG, Cioffi MA, Schinella P, et al. 1996 Evaluation of the impact of a bedside terminal system in a rapidly changing community hospital. Comput Nurs 13:280
Carlson RW, Michael A. 1999 Geheb computer applications in critical care medicine. Crit Care Clin 15(3):499–522
Stronge JH, Brodt A. 1985 Assessment of nurses’ attitudes toward computerization. Comput Nurs 3(4):154–158
Apon M, Singhaviran P. 2000 Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intens Care Med 27:122–130
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Donati A, Gabbanelli V, Pantanetti S, Carletti P, Principi T, Marini B, Nataloni S, Sambo G, Pelaia P. The impact of a clinical information system in an intensive care unit.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Donati, A., Gabbanelli, V., Pantanetti, S. et al. The Impact of a Clinical Information System in an Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Monit Comput 22, 31–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-007-9104-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-007-9104-x