Skip to main content
Log in

Fabrication of agarose concave petridish for 3D-culture microarray method for spheroids formation of hepatic cells

  • Tissue Engineering Constructs and Cell Substrates
  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liver is one of the most important organ in the body. But there are many limitations about liver transplantation for liver failure. It is quite important to develop the xenogeneic biological liver for providing an alternation to transplantation or liver regeneration. In this paper, we proposed a method to construct a novel kind of agarose 3D-culture concave microwell array for spheroids formation of hepatic cells. Using the 3D printing method, the microwell array was fabricated with an overall size of 6.4 mm × 6.4 mm, containing 121 microwells with 400 μm width/400 μm thickness. By exploiting the Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes as a bridge, we finally fabricated the agarose one. We co-cultured three types of liver cells with bionics design in the microwell arrays. Using the methods described above, the resulting co-formed hepatocyte spheroids maintained the high viability and stable liver-specific functions. This engineered agarose concave microwell array could be a potentially useful tool for forming the elements for biological liver support. After developing the complete system, we also would consider to scale up the application of this system. It will be not only applied to the therapy of human organ damage, but also to the development of disease models and drug screening models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taub R. Liver regeneration: from myth to mechanism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:836–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mann RE, Smart RG, Govoni R. The epidemiology of alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Res Health. 2003;27:209–19.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M, Cleries R. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S5–S16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim WR, Brown RS Jr., Terrault NA, El-Serag H. Burden of liver disease in the United States: summary of a workshop. Hepatology. 2002;36:227–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown KA. Liver transplantation. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu WH, Ren LN, Chen T, You N, Liu LY, Wang T, et al. Unbalanced distribution of materials: the art of giving rise to hepatocytes from liver stem/progenitor cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2014;18:1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mills JB, Rose KA, Sadagopan N, Sahi J, de Morais SM. Induction of drug metabolism enzymes and MDR1 using a novel human hepatocyte cell line. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;309:303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ripp SL, Mills JB, Fahmi OA, Trevena KA, Liras JL, Maurer TS, et al. Use of immortalized human hepatocytes to predict the magnitude of clinical drug-drug interactions caused by CYP3A4 induction. Drug Metab Dispos: Biol fate Chem. 2006;34:1742–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Youdim KA, Tyman CA, Jones BC, Hyland R. Induction of cytochrome P450: assessment in an immortalized human hepatocyte cell line (Fa2N4) using a novel higher throughput cocktail assay. Drug Metab Dispos: Biol Fate Chem. 2007;35:275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hariparsad N, Carr BA, Evers R, Chu X. Comparison of immortalized Fa2N-4 cells and human hepatocytes as in vitro models for cytochrome P450 induction. Drug Metab Dispos: Biol Fate Chem. 2008;36:1046–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Landry J, Bernier D, Ouellet C, Goyette R, Marceau N. Spheroidal aggregate culture of rat liver cells: histotypic reorganization, biomatrix deposition, and maintenance of functional activities. J Cell Biol. 1985;101:914–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li AP, Colburn SM, Beck DJ. A simplified method for the culturing of primary adult rat and human hepatocytes as multicellular spheroids. Vitr Cell Dev Biol. 1992;28A:673–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dilworth C, Hamilton GA, George E, Timbrell JA. The use of liver spheroids as an in vitro model for studying induction of the stress response as a marker of chemical toxicity. Toxicol Vitr. 2000;14:169–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brophy CM, Luebke-Wheeler JL, Amiot BP, Khan H, Remmel RP, Rinaldo P, et al. Rat hepatocyte spheroids formed by rocked technique maintain differentiated hepatocyte gene expression and function. Hepatology. 2009;49:578–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. LeCluyse EL, Witek RP, Andersen ME, Powers MJ. Organotypic liver culture models: meeting current challenges in toxicity testing. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42:501–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee PJ, Hung PJ, Lee LP. An artificial liver sinusoid with a microfluidic endothelial-like barrier for primary hepatocyte culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;97:1340–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Khetani SR, Bhatia SN. Microscale culture of human liver cells for drug development. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:120–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Domansky K, Inman W, Serdy J, Dash A, Lim MH, Griffith LG. Perfused multiwell plate for 3D liver tissue engineering. Lab Chip. 2010;10:51–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hori Y, Rulifson IC, Tsai BC, Heit JJ, Cahoy JD, Kim SK. Growth inhibitors promote differentiation of insulin-producing tissue from embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:16105–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Choi YY, Chung BG, Lee DH, Khademhosseini A, Kim JH, Lee SH. Controlled-size embryoid body formation in concave microwell arrays. Biomaterials. 2010;31:4296–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Park JY, Lee DH, Lee EJ, Lee SH. Study of cellular behaviors on concave and convex microstructures fabricated from elastic PDMS membranes. Lab a chip. 2009;9:2043–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kmiec Z. Cooperation of liver cells in health and disease. Adv Anat, Embryol, Cell Biol. 2001;161:1–151. III-XIII

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bhatia SN, Underhill GH, Zaret KS, Fox IJ. Cell and tissue engineering for liver disease. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:245sr2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takabatake H, Koide N, Tsuji T. Encapsulated multicellular spheroids of rat hepatocytes produce albumin and urea in a spouted bed circulating culture system. Artif Organs. 1991;15:474–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuasa C, Tomita Y, Shono M, Ishimura K, Ichihara A. Importance of cell aggregation for expression of liver functions and regeneration demonstrated with primary cultured hepatocytes. J Cell Physiol. 1993;156:522–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Luebke-Wheeler JL, Nedredal G, Yee L, Amiot BP, Nyberg SL. E-cadherin protects primary hepatocyte spheroids from cell death by a caspase-independent mechanism. Cell Transplant. 2009;18:1281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakai Y, Tanaka T, Fukuda J, Nakazawa K. Alkoxyresorufin O-dealkylase assay using a rat hepatocyte spheroid microarray. J Biosci Bioeng. 2010;109:395–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sakai Y, Yamagami S, Nakazawa K. Comparative analysis of gene expression in rat liver tissue and monolayer- and spheroid-cultured hepatocytes. Cells, Tissues, Organs. 2010;191:281–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fennema E, Rivron N, Rouwkema J, van Blitterswijk C, de Boer J. Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:108–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dvir-Ginzberg M, Gamlieli-Bonshtein I, Agbaria R, Cohen S. Liver tissue engineering within alginate scaffolds: effects of cell-seeding density on hepatocyte viability, morphology, and function. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:757–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Napolitano AP, Chai P, Dean DM, Morgan JR. Dynamics of the self-assembly of complex cellular aggregates on micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:2087–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yarmush ML, Toner M, Dunn JC, Rotem A, Hubel A, Tompkins RG. Hepatic tissue engineering. Development of critical technologies. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992;665:238–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Powers MJ, Domansky K, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR, Kalezi A, Capitano A, Upadhyaya A, et al. A microfabricated array bioreactor for perfused 3D liver culture. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;78:257–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Powers MJ, Janigian DM, Wack KE, Baker CS, Beer Stolz D, Griffith LG. Functional behavior of primary rat liver cells in a three-dimensional perfused microarray bioreactor. Tissue Eng. 2002;8:499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Glicklis R, Merchuk JC, Cohen S. Modeling mass transfer in hepatocyte spheroids via cell viability, spheroid size, and hepatocellular functions. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;86:672–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen DG, Funk J, Robbins JB, Crogan-Grundy C, Presnell SC, Singer T, et al. Bioprinted 3D primary liver tissues allow assessment of organ-level response to clinical drug induced toxicity in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Okudaira T, Amimoto N, Mizumoto H, Kajiwara T. Formation of three-dimensional hepatic tissue by the bottom-up method using spheroids. J Biosci Bioeng. 2016;122:213–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Thomas RJ, Bhandari R, Barrett DA, Bennett AJ, Fry JR, Powe D, et al. The effect of three-dimensional co-culture of hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells on key hepatocyte functions in vitro. Cells, Tissues, Organs. 2005;181:67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Toivonen S, Malinen MM, Kublbeck J, Petsalo A, Urtti A, Honkakoski P, et al. Regulation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatic cell phenotype by three-dimensional hydrogel models. Tissue Eng Part A. 2016;22:971–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. No da Y, Jeong GS, Lee SH. Immune-protected xenogeneic bioartificial livers with liver-specific microarchitecture and hydrogel-encapsulated cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35:8983–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang A, Park J, Ju J, Jeong GS, Lee SH. Cell encapsulation via microtechnologies. Biomaterials. 2014;35:2651–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Orive G, Hernandez RM, Gascon AR, Calafiore R, Chang TM, De Vos P, et al. Cell encapsulation: promise and progress. Nat Med. 2003;9:104–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2014A030312013), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81470875), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (201604020002), Science and Technology Development Cultivation Project of Southern Medical University (C1033042), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2014B020227002), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2015B090903069), Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2015B020229002)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qing Peng or Yi Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Li, Y., Wang, G. et al. Fabrication of agarose concave petridish for 3D-culture microarray method for spheroids formation of hepatic cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 29, 49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6058-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6058-0

Navigation