Skip to main content
Log in

Enhanced bioactivity of polyvinylidene chloride films using argon ion bombardment for guided bone regeneration

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Polyvinylidene chloride (PVDC) is a long chain carbon synthetic polymer. The objective of this study was to improve the bioactivity of PVDC films through surface modification using argon (Ar) ion bombardment to create Ar-modified PVDC films (Ar-PVDC) to address the clinical problems of guided bone regeneration (GBR), which is technique-sensitive, and low bone regenerative ability. First, the effects of Ar ion bombardment, a low temperature plasma etching technique widely used in industry, on PVDC film wettability, surface chemistry, and morphology were confirmed. Next, fibroblast-like and osteoblast-like cell attachment and proliferation on Ar-PVDC were assessed. As a preclinical in vivo study, Ar-PVDC was used to cover a critical-sized bone defect on rat calvaria and osteoconductivity was evaluated by micro-computed tomography analysis and histological examinations. We found that the contact angle of PVDC film decreased by 50° because of the production of –OH groups on the PVDC film surface, though surface morphological was unchanged at 30 min after Ar ion bombardment. We demonstrated that cell attachment increased by about 40 % and proliferation by more than 140 % because of increased wettability, and 2.4 times greater bone regeneration was observed at week 3 with Ar-PVDC compared with untreated PVDC films. These results suggest that Ar ion bombardment modification of PVDC surfaces improves osteoconductivity, indicating its potential to increase bone deposition during GBR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:237–59.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polimeni G, Albandar JM, Wikesjo€ UM. Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of space provision. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:951–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. Periodontol 2000. 2003; 33:36–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Obata A, Hotta T, Wakita T, Ota Y, Kasuga T. Electrospun microfiber meshes of silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) hybrid for guided bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010;6:1248–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung RE, Fenner N, Hämmerle CH, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12–14 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:1065–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bottino MC, Thomas V, Schmidt G, Vohra YK, Chu TM, Kowolik MJ, Janowski GM. Recent advances in the development of GTR/GBR membranes for periodontal regeneration—a materials perspective. Dent Mater. 2012;28:703–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants—a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:696–710.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement—a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamajima S, Hayashi T, Sato Y, Sasaki K, Kawai T. Osteoanagenesis after transplantation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using polyvinylidene chloride film as a scaffold. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:707–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21:667–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grinnell F. Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. Int Rev Cytol. 1978;53:65–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang P, Major D, Rutishauser U. Role of charge and hydration in effects of polysialic acid on molecular interactions on and between cell membranes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23039–44.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wei J, Yoshinari M, Takemoto S, Hattori M, Kawada E, Liu B, Oda Y. Adhesion of mouse fibroblasts on hexamethyldisiloxane surfaces with wide range of wettability. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2007;81:66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei J, Igarashi T, Okumori N, Igarashi T, Maetani T, Liu B, Yoshinari M. Influence of surface wettability on competitive protein adsorption and initial attachment of osteoblasts. Biomed Mater. 2009. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/4/4/045002.

    Google Scholar 

  15. An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A. Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2012;28:1207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Okumura A, Goto M, Goto T, Yoshinari M, Masuko S, Katsuki T, Tanaka T. Substrate affects the initial attachment and subsequent behavior of human osteoblastic cells (Saos-2). Biomaterials. 2001;22:2263–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sawase T, Jimbo R, Baba K, Shibata Y, Ikeda T, Atsuta M. Photo-induced hydrophilicity enhances initial cell behavior and early bone apposition. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:491–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Att W, Hori N, Iwasa F, Yamada M, Ueno T, Ogawa T. The effect of UV-photofunctionalization on the time-related bioactivity of titanium and chromium–cobalt alloys. Biomaterials. 2009;26:4268–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teraoka F, Nakagawa M, Hara M. Surface modification of poly(l-lactide) by atmospheric pressure plasma treatment and cell response. Dent Mater J. 2006;25:560–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wessling A. The solubility of poly(vinylidene chloride). J Appl Polym Sci. 1970;14:1531–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Everett DH, Taylor DJ. Kinetics of dehydrochlorination of poly(vinylidine chloride). Part 2. Effect of pre-irradiation with U.V. and γ-rays and the Influence of the chemical nature of the ambient atmosphere. Trans Faraday Soc. 1971;67:402–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Matheson LA, Boyer RF. Light stability of polystyrene and polyvinylidene chloride. Ind Eng Chem. 1952;44:867–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmaljohann D, Beyerlein D, Nitschke M, Werner C. Thermo-reversible swelling of thin hydrogel films immobilized by low-pressure plasma. Langmuir. 2004;20:10107–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Erbil HY. Surface tension of polymers. In: Birdi KS, editor. Handbook of surface and colloid chemistry. Boca Raton: CRC; 1997. p. 265–312.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Inoué T, Osatake H. A new drying method of biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy: the t-butyl alcohol freeze-drying method. Arch Histol Cytol. 1988;51:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mankani MH, Kuznetsov SA, Wolfe RM, Marshall GW, Robey PG. In vivo bone formation by human bone marrow stromal cells: reconstruction of the mouse calvarium and mandible. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2140–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupton SL, Gertler FB. Filopodia: the fingers that do the walking. Sci STKE. 2007;2007(400):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Small JV. Organization of actin in the leading edge of cultured cells: influence of osmium tetroxide and dehydration on the ultrastructure of actin meshworks. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Geginat J, Bossi G, Bender JR, Pardi R. Anchorage dependence of mitogen-induced G1 to S transition in primary T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1999;162:5085–93.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Danen EH, Yamada KM. Fibronectin, integrins, and growth control. J Cell Physiol. 2001;189:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao G, Schwartz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL, Boyan BD. High surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructure. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;74:49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bacáková L, Filová E, Rypácek F, Svorcík V, Starý V. Cell adhesion on artificial materials for tissue engineering. Physiol Res. 2004;53(Suppl 1):S35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Alborzi A, Mac K, Glackin CA, Murray SS, Zernik JH. Endochondral and intramembranous fetal bone development: osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist, and histone H4. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1996;16:94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Eriksson C, Nygren H, Ohlson K. Implantation of hydrophilic and hydrophobic titanium discs in rat tibia: cellular reactions on the surfaces during the first 3 weeks in bone. Biomaterials. 2004;25:4759–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (23390454; Development of implantable osteoinductive materials using a polysaccharide and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) combined 3D fabricated scaffold) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuichiro Kobayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, S., Hayashi, T., Asakura, M. et al. Enhanced bioactivity of polyvinylidene chloride films using argon ion bombardment for guided bone regeneration. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 25, 2049–2057 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5243-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5243-z

Keywords

Navigation