Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical effects, antimicrobial efficacy and cytotoxicity of usnic acid as a biofilm prophylaxis in PMMA

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments were performed to test the null hypothesis that the addition of a natural occurring antibiotic would not alter mechanical properties of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Compression and four-point bending tests were used to assess mechanical properties of zirconium dioxide bearing bone cement (Type Zr) and barium sulfate bearing bone cement (Type Ba), mixed with the antibiotic usnic acid (“usnic”), used to create a surface resistant to biofilm formation. Addition of usnic had a statistically significant effect on the material properties. Compressive and bending strengths decreased as usnic was added and Type Zr was stronger than Type Ba although material properties remained above recommended minima. With implications of liver toxicity with large doses of usnic taken as a dietary supplement, cytotoxicity tests using bone cement coupons were performed and showed very little or no toxicity in primary cultures of rabbit skin derived fibroblasts. A simple test of usnic’s efficacy as a biofilm prophylaxis in PMMA was also conducted. Bone cement coupons with usnic were tested for their effectiveness against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diminished biofilm formation on usnic-containing coupons indicated that usnic can be an effective anti-microbial agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smeds S, Goertzen D, Ivarsson I. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;334:326–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tunney MM, et al. Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(4):568–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Trampuz A, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(7):654–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Villa T, Carnelli D. Experimental evaluation of the biomechanical performances of a PMMA-based knee spacer. Knee. 2007;14(2):145–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Askew MJ, et al. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1990;24(5):573–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchholz HW, Elson RA, Heinert K. Antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement: current concepts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984;190:96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cui Q, et al. Antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infection associated with total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):871–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. He Y, et al. Effect of antibiotics on the properties of poly(methylmethacrylate)-based bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(6):800–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lautenschlager EP, et al. Mechanical properties of bone cements containing large doses of antibiotic powders. J Biomed Mater Res. 1976;10(6):929–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levin PD. The effectiveness of various antibiotics in methyl methacrylate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57(2):234–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marks KE, Nelson CL, Lautenschlager EP. Antibiotic-impregnated acrylic bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(3):358–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Durbhakula SM, et al. Spacer endoprosthesis for the treatment of infected total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(6):760–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pitto RP, Spika IA. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers in two-stage management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2004;28(3):129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong MS, et al. Mechanical characteristics of antibiotic-laden bone cement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2002;73(6):688–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klekamp J, et al. The use of vancomycin and tobramycin in acrylic bone cement: biomechanical effects and elution kinetics for use in joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1999;14(3):339–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leone J, et al. Biaxial flexural modulus of antibiotic-impregnated orthopedic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007;83(1):97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohd Fuad D, et al. Biomechanical properties of bone cement with addition of cefuroxime antibiotic. Med J Malaysia. 2006;61(Suppl A):27–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Neu HC. The crisis in antibiotic resistance. Science. 1992;257(5073):1064–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tunney MM, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from orthopedic implants following revision hip surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42(11):3002–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baleani M, et al. Biological and biomechanical effects of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:1232–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo L, et al. Review of usnic acid and Usnea barbata toxicity. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2008;26(4):317–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57(2):677–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(4):999–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stoodley P, et al. Direct demonstration of viable Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in an infected total joint arthroplasty. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(8):1751–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Francolini I, et al. Usnic acid, a natural antimicrobial agent able to inhibit bacterial biofilm formation on polymer surfaces. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(11):4360–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunne NJ, Orr JF. Influence of mixing techniques on the physical properties of acrylic bone cement. Biomaterials. 2001;22(13):1819–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pieters R, et al. Adaptation of the rapid automated tetrazolium dye based (MTT) assay for chemosensitivity testing in childhood leukemia. Cancer Lett. 1988;41(3):323–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Linden U. Mechanical properties of bone cement. Importance of the mixing technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;272:274–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Persson C, et al. Mechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(4):617–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dunne N, et al. In vitro study of the efficacy of acrylic bone cement loaded with supplementary amounts of gentamicin: effect on mechanical properties, antibiotic release, and biofilm formation. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(6):774–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holm NJ. The modulus of elasticity and flexural strength of some acrylic bone cements. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48(5):436–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson RC, Hoffman RO, Burton TA. The effect of antibiotic additions on the mechanical properties of acrylic cement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1978;12(4):473–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ginebra MP, et al. Mechanical performance of acrylic bone cements containing different radiopacifying agents. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8):1873–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kjellson F, et al. Effect of iodixanol particle size on the mechanical properties of a PMMA based bone cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(6):1043–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu C, et al. Some failure modes of four clinical bone cements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2001;215(4):359–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chitturi S, Farrell GC. Hepatotoxic slimming aids and other herbal hepatotoxins. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23(3):366–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Davies JP, et al. Influence of antibiotic impregnation on the fatigue life of Simplex P and Palacos R acrylic bone cements, with and without centrifugation. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23(4):379–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Carl Miller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, S., Greenleaf, R., Miller, M.C. et al. Mechanical effects, antimicrobial efficacy and cytotoxicity of usnic acid as a biofilm prophylaxis in PMMA. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 22, 2773–2780 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4445-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-011-4445-x

Keywords

Navigation