Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro biocompatibility of degradable biopolymers in cell line cultures from various ocular tissues: extraction studies

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In vitro biocompatibility of 50:50 PDLGA, 85:15 PDLGA, and Inion GTRTM membrane was evaluated in cell line cultures from various ocular tissues, in human corneal epithelial cells (HCE), rabbit stromal fibroblasts (SIRC), bovine corneal endothelial cells (BCE), human conjunctival epithelial cells (IOBA-NHC), and human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19). To study the toxicity of degradation products, the biomaterials were extracted in phosphate buffered saline at 70 °C for 24 h. The cell cultures were exposed to biomaterial extract diluted in medium (1:1–1:8) and the biocompatibility was evaluated by the WST-1 cytotoxicity/cell proliferation test. In all experiments without pH neutralization, cell viability increased with decreasing biomaterial extract volume. The highest extraction ratio 1:1 of PDLGA 50:50 decreased viability from 5–20%, from the control level, depending on the cell type. The corresponding cell viability values for PDLGA 85:15 and Inion GTR membrane ranged from 47–87% and 66–92%, respectively. When the pH of biomaterial extract was neutralized, Inion GTR membrane and PDLGA 85:15 had no effect on viability. BCE, HCE, and IOBA-NHC appeared to the most sensitive cell types, while SIRC and ARPE-19 were more resistant. The results of our in vitro studies suggest that the polymers tested are satisfactorily biocompatible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. YASUKAWA, Y. OGURA, H. KIMURA, E. SAKURAI and Y. TABATA, Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 3 (2006) 261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. ANDRIEU-SOLER, A. AUBERT-POUESSEL, M. DOAT, S. PICAUD, M. HALHAL, M. SIMONUTTI, M. C. VENIER-JULIENNE, J. P. BENOIT and F. BEHAR-COHEN, Mol. Vis. 11 (2005) 1002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. A. BEJJANI, D. BENEZRA, H. COHEN, J. RIEGER, C. ANDRIEU, J. C. JEANNY, G. GOLLOMB and F. F. BEHAR-COHEN, Mol. Vis. 11 (2005) 124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. L. C. LU, M. J. YASZEMSKI and A. G. MIKOS, Biomaterials 22 (2001) 3345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. L. P. ANG, Z. Y. CHENG, R. W. BEUERMAN, S. H. TEOH, X. ZHU and D. T. TAN, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 47 (2006) 105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, in “Biological Evaluation Of Medical Devices – Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5:1999)” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1999). p. 3

  7. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION, in “Biological Evaluation Of Medical Devices – Part 12: Sample Preparation And Reference Materials (ISO 10993-12:1996)” (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 1996). p. 5

  8. K. ARAKI-SASAKI, Y. OHASHI, T. SASABE, K. HAYASHI, H. WATANABE, Y. TANO and H. HANDA, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 36 (1995) 614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. LEERHOY, Science 149 (1965) 633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. GOSPODAROWICZ, A. L. MESCHER and C. R. BIRDWELL, Exp.Eye Res. 25 (1977) 75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. DIEBOLD, M. CALONGE, A. E. DE SALAMANCA, S. CALLEJO, R. M. CORRALES, V. SAEZ, K. F. SIEMASKO and M. E. STERN, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44 (2003) 4263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. C. DUNN, A. E. AOTAKIKEEN, F. R. PUTKEY and L. M. HJELMELAND, Exp. Eye Res. 62 (1996) 155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. K. A. ATHANASIOU, G. G. NIEDERAUER and C. M. AGRAWAL, Biomaterials 17 (1996) 93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. YASUKAWA, H. KIMURA, Y. TABATA and Y. OGURA, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 52 (2001) 25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. CAI, K. J. ZHU and S. L. YANG, Polymer 39 (1998) 4409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. K. J. ZHU, J. X. ZHANG, C. WANG, H. YASUDA, A. ICHIMARU and K. YAMAMOTO, J. Microencapsul. 20 (2003) 731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M. S. TAYLOR, A. U. DANIELS, K. P. ANDRIANO and J. HELLER, J. Appl. Biomater. 5 (1994) 151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. J. B. ULREICH and M. CHAVAPILIN, in “In Vitro Toxicity Testing: A Quantitative Microassay”, Edited by: S. A. Brown (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1983), p. 102

  19. R. ZANGE, Y. LI and T. KISSEL, J. Control. Release 56 (1998) 249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. K. R. KIDD, D. Dal PONTE, A. L. STONE, J. B. HOYING, R. B. NAGLE and S. K. WILLIAMS, Tissue Eng. 11 (2005) 1379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. E. BINZEN, A. LENDLEIN, S. KELCH, D. RICKERT and R. P. FRANKE, Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 30 (2004) 283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Technology Agency of Finland and the Medical Research Fund of Tampere University Hospital. The authors thank Dr. Araki-Sasaki and Dr. Calonge for the generous supply of cells. Mrs. Maija Koskela is gratefully acknowledged for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Huhtala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huhtala, A., Pohjonen, T., Salminen, L. et al. In vitro biocompatibility of degradable biopolymers in cell line cultures from various ocular tissues: extraction studies. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 19, 645–649 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3192-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-3192-5

Keywords

Navigation