Skip to main content
Log in

The flexural properties of end-trabecular beetle elytron plates and their flexural failure mechanism

  • Computation and theory
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In pursuit of the development of lightweight biomimetic functional–structural materials, this study investigated the flexural properties and failure characteristics of end-trabecular beetle elytron plates (EBEPs) as well as the flexural mechanism and the role of the trabeculae. The results were as follows: (1) The EBEP specimens showed better ductility performance after the peak load was reached, and their specific elastic strength and specific flexural strength were similar to those of honeycomb plates (HPs). In an EBEP before failure, the lower skin in the same location as the load was significantly stretched, and the trabeculae in the core showed two failure modes: destruction by means of slant cracks and vertical cracks. (2) The failure mechanism of the trabeculae in an EBEP was investigated by qualitatively analyzing the load and deformation of the parts adjacent and nonadjacent to the loading point. From the macro point of view, the cores of EBEP and HP are continuous. These cores can not only bear tension with lower skins, but also divide upper skins into much smaller parts and play a role as reinforcing ribs. The equivalent trabeculae in EBEP are closed ended, the honeycomb walls are narrow, and these two parts can support and constrain each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herrmann AS, Zahlen PC, Zuardy I (2005) Sandwich structures technology in commercial aviation: present applications and future trends. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kong XH (2010) Tensile mechanical properties of metal honeycomb sandwich structure with interface connection defects. Proc SPIE 7644:764421-1–764421-8

    Google Scholar 

  3. John M, Skala T, Wagner T, Schlimper R, Rinker M, Schäuble R (2013) Dimensional changes in CFRP/PMI foam core sandwich structures. Appl Compos Mater 20:601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deshpande VS, Ashby MF, Fleck NA (2001) Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater 49:1035–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sha ZD, He LC, Pei QX, Liu ZS, Zhang YW, Wang TJ (2014) The mechanical properties of a nanoglass/metallic glass/nanoglass sandwich structure. Scripta Mater 83:37–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Manshadi BD, Vassilopoulos AP, Keller T (2016) Post-wrinkling behavior of webs in GFRP cell–core sandwich structures. Compos Struct 138:276–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang DM, Bai ZY (2015) Mechanical property of paper honeycomb structure under dynamic compression. Mater Des 77:59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang DM, Liang N, Guo YF (2019) Finite element analysis on the out-of-plane compression for paper honeycomb. J Strain Anal 54(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Samad WA, Warsame AA, Khan A (2018) An experimental study on the edgewise compressive failure of paper honeycomb sandwich panels with respect to various aspect ratios. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 346:012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/346/1/012040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadir NA, Aminanda Y, Ibrahim MS, Mokhtar H (2018) Experimental study of low-velocity impact on foam-filled Kraft paper honeycomb structure. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 290:012082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/290/1/012082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang DM, Bai ZY, Liao QH (2018) 3D energy absorption diagram construction of paper honeycomb sandwich panel. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4067062

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cai LC, Zhang DY, Zhou SH, Xu W (2018) Investigation on mechanical properties and equivalent model of aluminum honeycomb sandwich panels. J Mater Eng Perform 27(12):6585–6596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Xiao Y, Hu YF, Zhang JG, Song CS, Liu ZB, Yu JG (2018) Dynamic bending responses of CFRP thin-walled square beams filled with aluminum honeycomb. Thin-Walled Struct 132:494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang QN, Zhang XW, Lu GX, Ruan D (2018) Ballistic impact behaviors of aluminum alloy sandwich panels with honeycomb cores: an experimental study. J Sandw Struct Mater 20(7):861–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma XM, Li X, Li SQ, Li RJ, Wang ZH, Wu GY (2019) Blast response of gradient honeycomb sandwich panels with basalt fiber metal laminates as skins. Int J Impact Eng 123:126–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaji G, Annamalai K (2018) Crushing response of square aluminium column filled with carbon fibre tubes and aluminium honeycomb. Thin-Walled Struct 132:667–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riccioa A, Raimondoa A, Saputoa S, Sellittoa A, Battaglia M, Petroneb G (2018) A numerical study on the impact behaviour of natural fibres made honeycomb cores. Compos Struct 202:909–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahu SK, Badgayan ND, Samanta S, Sahu D, Sreekanth PSR (2018) Influence of cell size on out of plane stiffness and in-plane compliance character of the sandwich beam made with tunable PCTPE nylon honeycomb core and hybrid polymer nanocomposite skin. Int J Mech Sci 148:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Studziński R (2017) Optimal design of sandwich panels with hybrid core. J Sandw Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636217742574

  20. Arbaoui J, Moustabchir H, Pruncu CI, Schmitt Y (2016) Modeling and experimental analysis of polypropylene honeycomb multi-layer sandwich composites under four-point bending. J Sandw Struct Mater 20(4):493–511

  21. Xiang JW, Du JX, Li DC, Scarpa F (2017) Numerical analysis of the impact resistance in aluminum alloy bi-tubular thin-walled structures designs inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci 52(22):13247–13260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1420-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hao P, Du JX (2018) Mechanical properties of bio-mimetic energy-absorbing materials under impact loading. J Mater Sci 53(5):3189–3197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1798-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alantali A, Alia RA, Umer R, Cantwell WJ (2017) Energy absorption in aluminum honeycomb cores reinforced with carbon fiber reinforced plastic tubes. J Sandw Struct Mater. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636217727145

  24. Xie ZH, Zhao W, Wang XN, Hang JT, Yue XS, Zhou X (2017) Low-velocity impact behavior of titanium honeycomb sandwich structures. J Sandw Struct Mater 20(8):1009–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bach MR, Chalivendra VB, Alves C, Depina E (2015) Mechanical characterization of natural biodegradable sandwich materials. J Sandw Struct Mater 19:482–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kiran MPS, Balasundar I, Gopinath K, Raghu T (2017) Parametric study on factors influencing the stiffness of honeycomb sandwich panels using impulse excitation technique. J Sandw Struct Mater 21(1):115–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsuka M, Ono M, Kitano H, Gokan N, Matsumoto T (1992) Insects biology. Tamagawa University, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  28. Herburn HR, Ball A (1973) On the structure and mechanical properties of beetle shells. J Mater Sci 8(5):618–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00561216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kundanati L, Signetti S, Gupta HS, Menegon M, Pugno NM (2018) Multilayer stag beetle elytra perform better under external loading via non-symmetric bending properties. J R Soc Interface 15(144). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2018.0427

  30. Zhang ZJ, Wu W, Jin T, Sun JY (2017) Relationship of hydration and nanomechanical characteristics of beetle cuticle. Bioinspired Biomim Nanobiomater 6(3):161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun JY, Wu W, Liu C, Jin T (2017) Investigating the nanomechanical properties and reversible color change properties of the beetle Dynastes tityus. J Mater Sci 52(11):6150–6160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0895-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sun JY, Wu W, Song ZL, Tong J, Zhang SJ (2019) Bio-inspirations for the development of light materials based on the nanomechanical properties and microstructures of beetle Dynastes tityus. J Bionic Eng 16:154–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiang CT (1994) Mechanism of natural composite materials and composite materials research Coleoptera insects bionic design—it’s gradual microstructure and mechanical behavior. Ph.D. thesis, Chongqing University, China

  34. Xiang CT, Fan JH (1994) On the strengthening and toughening mechanism of natural composites and research of biomimetic composites. Adv Mech 24:220–232

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen B, Yang XK (1997) Study of the genus Donaciolagria Pic from China (Coleoptera: Lagriidae). Entomol Sin 4:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen B, Peng XH, Fan JH (2000) Microstructure of natural biocomposites and research of biomimetic composites. Acta Mater Compos Sin 17(3):59–62

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen B, Peng XH, Fan JH, Chin J (2003) Fiber-reinforce characteristics of chafer cuticle and research on structure of branched fiber. Mater Res 17(6):630–636

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen JX (2001) Fundamental study on biomimetics composites. Ph.D. thesis, Kyoto Institute of Technology

  39. Chen JX, Wu G (2013) Beetle forewings: epitome of the optimal design for lightweight composite materials. Carbohydr Polym 91:659–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen JX, Xie J, Guan JS, Zhu H (2012) The molds and method for manufacturing integrated trabecular-polygonal grill honeycomb sandwich plates, Patent 201010228680.4, CN

  41. Chen JX, Zu Q, Wu G, Xie J, Tuo WY (2015) Review of beetle forewing structures and their biomimetic applications in China: (II) on the three-dimensional structure, modeling and imitation. Mater Sci Eng C 55:620–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen JX, Zhang XM, Okabe YJ, Xie J, Xu MY (2019) Beetle elytron plate and the synergistic mechanism of trabecular–honeycomb core structure. Sci China Technol Sci 62(1):87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen JX, Zhang XM, Okabe YJ, Saito K, Guo ZS, Pan LC (2017) The deformation mode and strengthening mechanism of compression in the beetle elytron plate. Mater Des 131:481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu XD, Pan LC, Chen JX, Zhang XM, Wei PX (2019) Experimental and numerical study on the energy absorption abilities of trabecular–honeycomb biomimetic structures inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci 54(3):2193–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2958-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. GB/T 1456-2005 (2005) Test method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under 51875102 and National Key R&D Program of China under 2017YFC0703705.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinxiang Chen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, M., Pan, L., Chen, J. et al. The flexural properties of end-trabecular beetle elytron plates and their flexural failure mechanism. J Mater Sci 54, 8414–8425 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03488-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03488-7

Navigation