Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mangosteen peel-derived porous carbon: synthesis and its application in the sulfur cathode for lithium sulfur battery

  • Energy materials
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Porous carbon with various structures from micropores (< 2 nm) to hierarchical pores (0–4 nm) was synthesized from biomass waste mangosteen peels via KOH activation process. Microporous carbon was obtained mainly at a low activation temperature of 700 °C or a low alkali/carbon of 3. Hierarchical porous carbon with ultrahigh surface area (> 3000 m2 g−1) and pore volume (> 1.4 cm3 g−1) was obtained at alkali/carbon ratio higher than 3.5 and activation temperature of 800 °C. Sulfur with a high content of 65 wt% was able to be fully accommodated into the pores of hierarchical porous carbon to form C/S composite cathode for lithium sulfur battery while in the case of microporous carbon, residual sulfur on carbon surface was detected. High specific discharge capacities of more than 800 mAh g−1 were achieved from hierarchical porous carbon/S composites at 0.5 C, and the sample synthesized at alkali/carbon of 4 and activation of 800 °C exhibits the best cycling performance. After 500 cycles at 0.5 C, a high discharge capacity of 509 mAh g−1 was maintained, indicating an excellent capacity retention. Relationship between pore characteristics of porous carbon and the electrochemical performance of its sulfur composite was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2012) Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin YX, Xin S, Guo YG, Wan LJ (2013) Lithium–sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:13186–13200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bresser D, Passerini S, Scrosati B (2013) Recent progress and remaining challenges in sulfur-based lithium secondary batteries—a review. Chem Commun 49:10545–10562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manthiram A, Chung SH, Zu C (2015) Lithium–sulfur batteries: progress and prospect. Adv Mater 27:1980–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ji X, Lee KT, Nazar LF (2009) A highly ordered nanostructured carbn–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat Mater 8:500–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang DW, Zeng QC, Zhou GM, Yin LC, Li F, Cheng HM, Gentle IR, Lu GQM (2013) Carbon–sulfur composites for Li–S batteries: status and prospects. J Mater Chem A 1:9382–9394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Z, Huang Y, Yuan L, Hao Z, Huang Y (2015) Status and prospects in sulfur–carbon composites as cathode materials for rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 92:41–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S, Zheng M, Cao J, Pang H (2016) Porous carbon/sulfur composite cathode materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. Prog Chem 28:1148–1155

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peng HJ, Huang JQ, Cheng XB, Zhang Q (2017) Review on high-loading and high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 7:1700260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fang R, Zhao S, Sun Z, Wang DW, Cheng HM, Li F (2017) More reliable lithium–sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects. Adv Mater 29:1606823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kong L, Peng HJ, Huang JQ, Zhang Q (2017) Review of nanostructured current collectors in lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Res 10:4027–4054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Imtiaz S, Zhang J, Zafar ZA, Ji S, Huang T, Anderson JA, Zhang Z, Huang Y (2016) Biomass-derived nanostructured porous carbons for lithium–sulfur batteries. Sci China Mater 59:389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Nie P, Ding B, Dong S, Hao X, Dou H, Zhang X (2017) Biomass derived carbon for energy storage devices. J Mater Chem A 5:2411–2428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei SC, Zhang H, Huang YQ, Wang WK, Xia YZ, Yu ZB (2011) Pig bone derived hierarchical porous carbon and its enhanced cycling performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Energ Environ Sci 4:736–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao S, Li C, Wang W, Zhang H, Gao M, Xiong X, Wang A, Yuan K, Huang Y, Wang F (2013) A novel porous nanocomposite of sulfur/carbon obtained from fish scales for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 1:3334–3339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J, Xiang JY, Dong ZM, Liu Y, Wu YS, Xu CM, Du GH (2014) Biomass derived activated carbon with 3D connected architecture for rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 116:146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang ST, Zheng MB, Lin ZX, Li NW, Liu YJ, Zhao B, Pang H, Cao JM, He P, Shi Y (2014) Activated carbon with ultrahigh specific surface area synthesized from natural plant material for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 2:15889–15896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun Z, Wang S, Yan L, Xiao M, Han D, Meng Y (2016) Mesoporous carbon materials prepared from litchi shell as sulfur encapsulator for lithium–sulfur battery application. J Power Sources 324:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo J, Zhang J, Jiang F, Zhao S, Su Q, Du G (2015) Microporous carbon nanosheets derived from corncobs for lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 176:853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Geng Z, Xiao Q, Wang D, Yi G, Xu Z, Li B, Zhang C (2016) Improved electrochemical performance of biomass-derived nanoporous carbon/sulfur composites cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries by nitrogen doping. Electrochim Acta 202:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li H, Gong Y, Fu C, Zhou H, Yang W, Guo M, Li M, Kuang Y (2017) A novel method to prepare a nanotubes@mesoporous carbon composite material based on waste biomass and its electrochemical performance. J Mater Chem A 5:3875–3887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Helen M, Reddy MA, Diemant T, Golla-Schindler U, Behm RJ, Kaiser U, Fichtner M (2015) Single step transformation of sulphur to Li2S2/Li2S in Li–S batteries. Sci Rep 5:12146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu M, Chen Y, Chen K, Zhang N, Zhao X, Zhao F, Dou Z, He X, Wang L (2015) Biomass-derived activated carbon for rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. BioResources 10:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen ZH, Du XL, He JB, Li F, Wang Y, Li YL, Li B, Xin S (2017) Porous coconut shell carbon offering high retention and deep lithiation of sulfur for lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:33855–33862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang K, Gao QM, Tan YL, Tian WQ, Zhu LH, Yang CX (2015) Microporous carbon derived from Apricot shell as cathode material for lithium–sulfur battery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 204:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang K, Gao Q, Tan Y, Tian W, Qian W, Zhu L, Yang C (2016) Biomass-derived porous carbon with micropores and small mesopores for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem Eur J 22:3239–3244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li F, Qin F, Zhang K, Fang J, Lai Y, Li J (2017) Hierarchically porous carbon derived from banana peel for lithium sulfur battery with high areal and gravimetric sulfur loading. J Power Sources 362:160–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moreno N, Caballero A, Hernan L, Morales J (2014) Lithium–sulfur batteries with activated carbons derived from olive stones. Carbon 70:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen F, Yang J, Bai T, Long B, Zhou X (2016) Biomass waste-derived honeycomb-like nitrogen and oxygen dual-doped porous carbon for high performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 192:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Qu J, Lv S, Peng X, Tian S, Wang J, Gao F (2016) Nitrogen-doped porous “green carbon” derived from shrimp shell: combined effects of pore sizes and nitrogen doping on the performance of lithium sulfur battery. J Alloys Compd 671:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang S, Zheng M, Lin Z, Zang R, Huang Q, Xue H, Cao J, Pang H (2016) Mango stone-derived activated carbon with high sulfur loading as a cathode material for lithium–sulfur batteries. RSC Adv 6:39918–39925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu Y, Xu GY, Zhang XL, Wang SJ, Li C, Wang GX (2017) Hierarchical porous carbon derived from soybean hulls as a cathode matrix for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloys Compd 695:2246–2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu J, Liu B, Wang C, Huang Z, Hu L, Ke X, Liu L, Shi Z, Guo Z (2017) Walnut shell—derived activated carbon: synthesis and its application in the sulfur cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Alloys Compd 718:373–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen K, Xue D (2017) Multiple functional biomass-derived activated carbon materials for aqueous supercapacitors, lithium–ion capacitors and lithium–sulfur batteries. Chin J Chem 35:861–866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rybarczyk MK, Peng H-J, Tang C, Lieder M, Zhang Q, Titirici M-M (2016) Porous carbon derived from rice husks as sustainable bioresources: insights into the role of micro-/mesoporous hierarchy in hosting active species for lithium–sulphur batteries. Green Chem 18:5169–5179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li JT, Wu JH, Zhang T, Huang L (2017) Preparation of biochar from different biomasses adn their application in the Li–S battery. Acta Phys Chim Sin 33:968–975

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vu DL, Seo JS, Lee HY, Lee JW (2017) Activated carbon with hierarchical micro–mesoporous structure obtained from rice husk and its application for lithium–sulfur batteries. RSC Adv 7:4144–4151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Konarov A, Li Z, Chen P (2015) Effect of mesoporous carbon microtube prepared by carbonizing the poplar catkin on sulfur cathode performance in Li/S batteries. J Alloys Compd 619:298–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Półrolniczak P, Nowicki P, Wasiński K, Pietrzak R, Walkowiak M (2016) Biomass-derived hierarchical carbon as sulfur cathode stabilizing agent for lithium–sulfur batteries. Solid State Ionics 297:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cheng Y, Ji S, Xu X, Liu J (2015) Wheat straw carbon matrix wrapped sulfur composites as a superior cathode for Li–S batteries. RSC Adv 5:100089–100096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guo D, Zheng C, Deng W, Xa Chen, Wei H, Liu M, Huang S (2016) Nitrogen-doped porous carbon plates derived from fallen camellia flower for electrochemical energy storage. J Solid State Electrochem 21:1165–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zheng M, Hu Q, Zhang S, Tang H, Li L, Pang H (2017) Macroporous activated carbon derived from rapeseed shell for lithium–sulfur batteries. Appl Sci 7:1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ji S, Imtiaz S, Sun D, Xin Y, Li Q, Huang T, Zhang Z, Huang Y (2017) Coralline-like N-doped hierarchically porous carbon derived from enteromorpha as a host matrix for lithium–sulfur battery. Chem Eur J 23:18208–18215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hernández-Rentero C, Córdoba R, Moreno N, Caballero A, Morales J, Olivares-Marín M, Gómez-Serrano V (2017) Low-cost disordered carbons for Li/S batteries: a high-performance carbon with dual porosity derived from cherry pits. Nano Res 11:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao Y, Wang L, Huang L, Maximov MY, Jin M, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhou G (2017) Biomass-derived oxygen and nitrogen co-doped porous carbon with hierarchical architecture as sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium/sulfur batteries. Nanomaterials 7:402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhao Y, Zhang X, He Y, Liu N, Tan T, Liang C (2017) Biomass derived nitrogen-doped highly porous carbon material with a hierarchical porous structure for high-performance lithium/sulfur batteries. Materials 10:1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yao H, Zheng G, Li W, McDowell MT, Seh Z, Liu N, Lu Z, Cui Y (2013) Crab shells as sustainable templates from nature for nanostructured battery electrodes. Nano Lett 13:3385–3390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yu M, Li R, Tong Y, Li Y, Li C, Hong J-D, Shi G (2015) A graphene wrapped hair-derived carbon/sulfur composite for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:9609–9615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang Y, Gao Z, Li X (2017) Capillarity composited recycled paper/graphene scaffold for lithium–sulfur batteries with enhanced capacity and extended lifespan. Small 13:1701927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang J, Kaskel S (2012) KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. J Mater Chem 22:23710–23725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xue M, Chen C, Ren Z, Tan Y, Li B, Zhang C (2017) A novel mangosteen peels derived hierarchical porous carbon for lithium sulfur battery. Mater Lett 209:594–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quan Y (2017) Microporous carbon materials from bacterial cellulose for lithium–sulfur battery applications. Int J Electrochem Sci 12:5984–5997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang B, Qin X, Li GR, Gao XP (2010) Enhancement of long stability of sulfur cathode by encapsulating sulfur into micropores of carbon spheres. Energy Environ Sci 3:1531–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang B, Xiao M, Wang S, Han D, Song S, Chen G, Meng Y (2014) Novel hierarchically porous carbon materials obtained from natural biopolymer as host matrixes for lithium–sulfur battery applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:13174–13182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sahore R, Levin BDA, Pan M, Muller DA, DiSalvo FJ, Giannelis EP (2016) Design principles for optimum performance of porous carbons in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 6:1600134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Park MS, Jeong BO, Kim TJ, Kim S, Kim JK, Yu JS, Jung Y, Kim YJ (2014) Disordered mesoporous carbon as polysulfide reservoir for improved cyclic performance of lithium–sulfur batteries. Carbon 68:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Winuprasith T, Suphantharika M (2013) Microfibrillated cellulose from mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) rind: preparation, characterization, and evaluation as an emulsion stabilizer. Food Hydrocolloids 32:383–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ahmad MA, Alrozi R (2010) Optimization of preparation conditions for mangosteen peel-based activated carbons for the removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R using response surface methodology. Chem Eng J 165:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2012) Factors affecting the carbon yield and adsorption capability of the mangosteen peel activated carbon prepared by microwave assisted K2CO3 activation. Chem Eng J 180:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen J, Li S, Fu W, Zhang J (2007) Analysis on trace elements in Garcinia mangostana Linn. Guangdong Trace Elem Sci 14:40–42

    Google Scholar 

  61. Liu YB, Liu JP, Zhao Y, Li PY (2006) Analysis of inorganic elements in fruit pericarp and pedicel of Garcinia mangostana L. Spec Wild Econ Anim Plant Res 4:60–61

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li WF, Liu MN, Wang J, Zhang YG (2017) Progress of lithium/sulfur batteries based on chemically modified carbon. Acta Phys Chim Sin 33:165–182

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chen XY, Chen C, Zhang ZJ, Xie DH, Deng X, Liu JW (2013) Nitrogen-doped porous carbon for supercapacitor with long-term electrochemical stability. J Power Sources 230:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Chen XY, He YY, Song H, Zhang ZJ (2014) Structure and electrochemical performance of highly nanoporous carbons from benzoate–metal complexes by a template carbonization method for supercapacitor application. Carbon 72:410–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Li B, Dai F, Xiao Q, Yang L, Shen J, Zhang C, Cai M (2016) Nitrogen-doped activated carbon for a high energy hybrid supercapacitor. Energy Environ Sci 9:102–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mingzhe Xue or Cunman Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, M., Chen, C., Tan, Y. et al. Mangosteen peel-derived porous carbon: synthesis and its application in the sulfur cathode for lithium sulfur battery. J Mater Sci 53, 11062–11077 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2370-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2370-9

Keywords

Navigation