Skip to main content
Log in

A TEM study of the crystallography of lath-shaped austenite precipitates in a duplex stainless steel

  • Metals
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The morphology of austenite (fcc) precipitates in a duplex stainless steel (DSS) is dominated by rods distributed in a ferrite (bcc) matrix. Minority of austenite precipitates also exhibits a lath shape, a common morphology in fcc to bcc transformations rather than a bcc to fcc transformation in a DSS. While the rod-shaped austenite precipitates in a DSS have been interpreted in previous investigations, precipitates with a lath shape were not well understood. This study focused on the lath-shaped austenite by using transmission electron microscopy. The habit plane of lath-shaped austenite was observed to be free of dislocations, but one array of dislocations was observed in the major side facet with a spacing of 9.6 nm and Burgers vector of [110]f/2|[010]b. These observations of crystallographic features were interpreted consistently by an O-line and good matching site analysis. Different morphologies in a DSS and similar morphologies in fcc to bcc and bcc to fcc transformations are compared and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The morphology of precipitates in fcc/bcc systems was mainly distinguished by the cross-sectional shape. The aspect ratio (width to thickness) of lath shape is around 2–4, while the aspect ratio for rod shape is around 1.

References

  1. Luo CP, Weatherly GC (1987) The invariant line and precipitation in a Ni-45 wt% Cr alloy. Acta Metall 35(8):1963–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luo CP, Weatherly GC (1988) The interphase boundary structure of precipitates in a Ni–Cr alloy. Philos Mag A 58(3):445–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen JK, Chen G, Reynolds WT Jr (1998) Interfacial structure and growth mechanisms of lath-shaped precipitates in Ni-45 wt% Cr. Philos Mag A 78(2):405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Furuhara T, Wada K, Maki T (1995) Atomic structure of interphase boundary enclosing bcc precipitate formed in fcc matrix in a Ni-Cr alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 26(8):1971–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hall MG, Aaronson HI, Kinsma KR (1972) The structure of nearly coherent fcc: bcc boundaries in a Cu–Cr alloy. Surf Sci 31:257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Luo CP, Dahmen U, Westmacott KH (1994) Morphology and crystallography of Cr precipitates in a Cu-0.33 wt% Cr alloy. Acta Metall Mater 42(6):1923–1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo CP, Dahmen U (1998) Interface structure of faceted lath-shaped Cr precipitates in a Cu–0.33 wt% Cr alloy. Acta Mater 46(6):2063–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dahmen U, Ferguson P, Westmacott K (1984) Invariant line strain and needle-precipitate growth directions in Fe–Cu. Acta Metall 32(5):803–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii T, Mori T, Kato M (1992) Crystallography and morphology of needle-like α-Fe precipitate particles in a Cu matrix. Acta Metall Mater 40(12):3413–3420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Forwood CT, Clarebrough LM (1989) The dislocation structure of f.c.c-b.c.c. interfaces in a Cu-Fe alloy. Philos Mag B 59(6):637–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ameyama K, Weatherly GC, Aust KT (1992) A study of grain boundary nucleated widmanstätten precipitates in a two-phase stainless steel. Acta Metall Mater 40(8):1835–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiao H, Aindow M, Pond RC (2003) Precipitate orientation relationships and interfacial structures in duplex stainless steel Zeron-100. Philos Mag 83(16):1867–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu D, Zhang W-Z (2007) A TEM study of the crystallography of austenite precipitates in a duplex stainless steel. Acta Mater 55(20):6754–6764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rigsbee JM, Aaronson HI (1979) A computer modeling study of partially coherent FCC: BCC boundaries. Acta Metall 27(3):351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bollmann W (1974) O-Lattice calculation of an FCC–BCC interface. Phys Status Solidi A 21(2):543–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bollmann W (1970) Crystal defects and crystalline interfaces. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hall MG, Aaronson HI (1986) The fine structure fcc/bcc boundaries in a Cu-0.3% Cr alloy. Acta Metall 34(7):1409–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall MG, Rigsbee JM, Aaronson HI (1986) Application of the “0” lattice calculation to fcc/bcc interfaces. Acta Metall 34(7):1419–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahmen U (1981) The role of the invariant line in the search for an optimum interphase boundary by O-lattice theory. Scr Metall 15(1):77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dahmen U (1982) Orientation relationships in precipitation systems. Acta Metall 30(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao SQ, Howe JM (2000) Analysis of a two-dimensional invariant line interface for the case of a general transformation strain and application to thin-film interfaces. Acta Mater 48(12):3253–3260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu D, Zhang W-Z (2003) A systematic study of irrational precipitation crystallography in fcc–bcc systems with an analytical O-line method. Philos Mag 83(27):3093–3116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang W-Z, Purdy GR (1993) O-lattice analyses of interfacial misfit. II. Systems containing invariant lines. Philos Mag A 68(2):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liang Q, Reynolds W Jr (1998) Determining interphase boundary orientations from near-coincidence sites. Metall Mater Trans A 29(8):2059–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurdjumow G, Sachs G (1930) Über den mechanismus der stahlhärtung. Zeitschrift für Physik 64(5–6):325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai WT, Tsai KM, Lin CJ, Fu Y (2003) Selective corrosion in duplex stainless steel. Electrochemistry 9(2):170–176

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang M-X (1997) Crystallography of phase transformations in steels. University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meng Y, Gu L, Zhang W-Z (2010) Precise determination of the irrational preferred interface orientation by TEM. Acta Metall Sin 46(4):411–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang W-Z, Weatherly GC (2005) On the crystallography of precipitation. Prog Mater Sci 50(2):181–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dai F-Z, Zhang W-Z (2013) A systematic study on the interfacial energy of O-line interfaces in fcc/bcc systems. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 21(7):075002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang X-P, Zhang W-Z (2012) A systematic analysis of good matching sites between two lattices. Sci China Technol Sci 55:1343–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qiu D, Zhang W-Z (2008) An extended near-coincidence-sites method and the interfacial structure of austenite precipitates in a duplex stainless steel. Acta Mater 56(9):2003–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Knowles KM, Smith DA (1982) The application of surface dislocation theory to the fcc-bcc interface. Acta Crystallogr A 38(1):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kalman D (1996) A singularly valuable decomposition: the SVD of a matrix. College Math J 27(1):2–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gu X-F, Zhang W-Z, Qiu D (2011) A systematic investigation of the development of the orientation relationship in an fcc/bcc system. Acta Mater 59:4944–4956

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51471097 and No. 51671111) and helpful discussions from Dr. Dong Qiu are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Zheng Zhang.

Appendix

Appendix

The experimentally measured orientation matrix b M f was determined by the two pairs of parallel direction in Eq. 1 as

$$ {}_{\text{b} }\textbf{M}_{\text{f} } = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {0.67} & { - 0.74} & {0.07} \\ {0.74} & {0.65} & { - 0.17} \\ {0.08} & {0.17} & {0.98} \\ \end{array} } \right] $$
(10)

In the O-line condition with the minimum interfacial energy of O-line interfaces, the transformation matrix A and displacement matrix T were determined as

$$ \textbf{A} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {1.12} & {0.07} & {0.06} \\ { - 0.08} & {1.11} & {0.14} \\ { - 0.07} & { - 0.20} & {0.78} \\ \end{array} } \right] $$
(11a)

and

$$ \textbf{T} = \textbf{I} - \textbf{A}^{ - 1} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {0.12} & {0.07} & {0.06} \\ { - 0.05} & {0.13} & {0.16} \\ { - 0.10} & { - 0.21} & { - 0.23} \\ \end{array} } \right] , $$
(11b)

where I is a unit matrix. The orientation matrix M is related to A by

$$ \textbf{M} = \textbf{CA}^{ - 1} /(\textbf{a}_{\rm f} /\textbf{a}_{\rm b} ) = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {0.66} & { - 0.75} & {0.08} \\ {0.75} & {0.64} & { - 0.17} \\ {0.08} & {0.17} & {0.98} \\ \end{array} } \right] , $$
(12)

where C is the Bain correspondence matrix. The column vectors of C are given by [110], \( [\overline{1}10] \) and [001] corresponding to the OR in Eq. 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, J., Mompiou, F. & Zhang, WZ. A TEM study of the crystallography of lath-shaped austenite precipitates in a duplex stainless steel. J Mater Sci 52, 11688–11700 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1324-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1324-y

Keywords

Navigation