Skip to main content
Log in

Elastic consideration of the precipitation in model alloys of maraging steels: theory and experimental validation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The unique combination of high strength and high fracture toughness in maraging steels is attributed to the precipitation of mainly two phases, Ni3Mo and Ni3Ti, in the soft bcc martensitic matrix. Experimentally, it is difficult to distinguish between these phases; moreover, the effect of each precipitating phase on the properties of the steel is ambiguous. In the present work, we tackle these questions by analyzing the elastic fields and elastic energy associated with each precipitating phase and their role in the determination of the shape and relative arrangement. Using a semi-analytic approach based on the solution of the equations of elasticity by Fourier transform, the elastic fields and elastic energy associated with each precipitate were calculated. The calculations show that the minimum self-energy of both precipitates is accomplished when the smallest crystallographic misfit lies parallel to the longest geometric axis. The combination of elastic energy and surface energy provides an explanation to the observed morphologies of the precipitates, each type having an elongated shape but with a different aspect ratio. According to the calculations, the minimum self-elastic energy associated with Ni3Ti coherent precipitate is 2.8-fold larger than the energy of Ni3Mo. This implies for a larger strengthening effect of the former, as was confirmed experimentally in model alloys, one without Mo and the other without Ti. The elastic model also predicts that elongated shape and the anisotropic misfit strains favor several vertical arrangements of both precipitates, as was also verified experimentally by transmission electron microscopy of aged model alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The surface area of a thin plate is approximately \( 2\pi a_{1}^{2}, \) and the surface area of a thin rod is nearly \( 2\pi a_{2} c_{2} \). Assuming equal volumes, the surface area of the plate is larger than the area of the rod when \( a_{1} > \left( {\beta_{1} /\beta_{2} } \right)c_{2} \). According to Fig. 6b, the elastic energy of a rod with β 2 = 20 is equal to that of a plate with β 1 = 0.2. For this situation, the surface area of the plate is larger when a 1 > 0.01c 2, which is an obvious relation for precipitates in solids.

References

  1. Decker RF, Eash JT, Goldman AJ (1962) Eighteen percent nickel maraging steel. Trans ASM 55:58–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Floreen S (1968) The physical metallurgy of maraging steels. Inter Mater Rev 13:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohrbach K, Schmidt M (1991) Maraging steel in ASM Handbook, vol 1. ASM International Handbook, OH, pp 793–800

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao MN (2006) Progress in understanding the metallurgy of 18% nickel maraging steel. Int J Mater Res 97:1594–1607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moshka O, Pinkas M, Brosh E, Ezersky V, Meshi L (2013) MSc thesis, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, unpublished research

  6. Jagle EA, Choi PP, Humbeeck JV, Raabe D (2014) Precipitation and austenite reversion behavior of maraging steel produced by selective laser melting. J Mater Res 17:2072–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dmitrievas O, Choi P, Gerstl SSA, Raabe D (2011) Pulsed-laser atom probe studies of a precipitation hardened maraging TRIP steel. Ultramicroscopy 111:623–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dmitrieva O, Ponge D, Inden G, Millán J, Choi P, Sietsma J, Raabe D (2011) Chemical gradients across phase boundaries between martensite and austenite in steel studied by atom probe tomography and simulation. Acta Mater 59:364–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Millán J, Raabe D, Choi P, Dmitrieva O (2011) Characterization of nano-sized precipitates in Mn-based lean Maraging steel by atom probe tomography. Steel Res 82:137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Raabe D, Ponge D, Dmitrieva O, Sander B (2009) Nanoprecipitate-hardened 1.5 GPa steels with unexpected high ductility. Scripta Mater 60:1141–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eshelby JD (1961) Elastic inclusions and inhomogeneities. In: Sneddon NI, Hill R (eds) Progress in solid mechanics, vol 2. North Holland, Amsterdam, p 89 [(a) discussion of eq. 2.26]

  12. Mura T (1987) Micromechanics of defects in solids, 2nd edn. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Khachaturyan AG (1983) Theory of structural transformations in solids. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shneck RZ (2001) Microstructural shape evolution of γ’ in nickel-based superalloys by stress-assisted diffusion. Philos Mag A 2:383–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang SJ, Kim YW, Kim M, Zuo J (2014) Determination of interfacial atomic structure, misfits and energetics of Ω phase in Al–Cu–Mg–Ag alloy. Acta Mater 81:501–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fallah V, Korinek A, Opoku NO, Raeisinia B, Gallerneault M, Provatas N, Esmaeili S (2015) Atomic-scale pathway of early-stage precipitation in Al–Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 82:457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji YZ, Issa A, Heo TW, Saal JE, Wolverton C, Chen L-Q (2014) Predicting β′ precipitate morphology and evolution in Mg–RE alloys using a combination of first-principles calculations and phase-field modeling. Acta Mater 76:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurdjumov G, Sachs G (1930) Über den mechanismus der stahlhärtung. Zeitschrift für Physik 64:325–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li X, Yin Z (1995) A computer-simulated electron diffraction analysis of precipitates in 18 Ni (350) maraging steel. Materials Letter 23:269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pereloma EV, Shekhter A, Miller MK, Ringer SP (2004) Ageing behaviour of an Fe–20Ni–1.8Mn–1.6Ti–0.59Al (wt%) maraging alloy: clustering precipitation and hardening. Acta Mater 52:5589–5602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt M, Rohrbach K (1991) Heat treating of maraging steels in ASM handbook, vol 4, heat treating. ASM International Handbook, OH, pp 219–228

  22. Choi BI, Earmme YY (1986) Interactions of spherical precipitates in an anisotropic matrix. Mech Mater 5:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson WC, Lee JO (1986) Elastic fields of inhomogeneous precipitate in Phase transformation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 115–139

    Google Scholar 

  24. Millán J, Sandlöbes S, Al-Zubi A, Hickel T, Choi P, Neugebauer J, Ponge D, Raabe D (2014) Designing Heusler nanoprecipitates by elastic misfit stabilization in Fe–Mn maraging steels. Acta Mater 76:94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. O. Omasi for the preparation of the model alloys. This study was supported by the joint IAEC-UPBC Pazy foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Shmulevitsh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shmulevitsh, M., Meshi, L., Pinkas, M. et al. Elastic consideration of the precipitation in model alloys of maraging steels: theory and experimental validation. J Mater Sci 50, 4970–4979 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9044-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9044-7

Keywords

Navigation