Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The entrepreneurial experience and strategic orientation of high-tech born global start-ups: An analysis of novice and habitual entrepreneurs

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new type of “born global” (BG) firm has attracted the attention of international business researchers, encouraging the development of international entrepreneurship theory as a separate field of research. This theory proposes that the development of BG start-ups depends on their entrepreneurs, such that their strategic orientation can explicate their accelerated foreign growth and performance abroad. However, empirical analyses of BG start-ups are rare, with a few studies that examine their different manifestations. This study therefore investigates the role of entrepreneurial experience in influencing the different manifestations of strategic orientation, through a comparison of eight Italian, Internet-based BG start-ups founded by either novice or habitual entrepreneurs. Following a case-based approach, the conceptual framework presents the strategic orientation of BG start-ups as a multidimensional construct, comprising learning, market, and entrepreneurial orientations. Some propositions suggest how the different levels of entrepreneurial experience among novice and habitual entrepreneurs may influence the strategic orientation of their BG start-ups and offer insights for researchers interested in strategic orientation and entrepreneurial experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acedo F, Jones MV (2007) Speed of internationalisation and entrepreneurial cognition; insights and a comparison between international new ventures, exporters and domestic firms. J World Bus 42(3):236–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs Z, Dana LP, Jones M (2003) Toward new horizons: The internationalization of entrepreneurship. J Int Entrep 1(1):5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich HE, Fiol CM (1994) Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Acad Manag Rev 19(4):645–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson V, Boocock G (2002) Small firms and internationalization: Learning to manage and managing to learn. Hum Resour Manag J 12(3):5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S (2000) The internationalization of the firm from an entrepreneurial perspective. Int Stud Manag Organ 20(1):63–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S (2004) Internationalization in different industrial contexts. J Bus Ventur 19(6):851–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Evangelista F (2006) The entrepreneur in the born global firm in Australia and Sweden. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 13(4):642–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Wictor I (2003) Innovative internationalization in new firms: Born globals-the Swedish case. J Int Entrep 1(3):249–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardichvili A, Cardozo R, Ray S (2003) A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. J Bus Ventur 18(1):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio E (2005) Creative tension: The significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s article toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio E, Sapienza HJ, Almeida JG (2000) Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Acad Manag J 43(5):909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE, Sinkula JM (1999a) The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Mark Sci 27:411–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WE, Sinkula JM (1999b) Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organizational performance. J Mark Focus Manag 4(4):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baronchelli G, Cassia F (2011) Exploring the antecedents of born global companies’ international development. Int Entrep Manag J. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0179-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley SJ, Stockley S (2000) Entrepreneurial teams and venture growth. In: Sexton DL, Landström H (eds) The Blackwell handbook of entrepreneurship. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood J, Sapienza H, Almeida J (1996) The internationalization of new high potential ventures: Antecedents and outcomes. Entrep Theory Pract 20:61–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhaus RH (1980) Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Acad Manag J 23(3):509–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability and firm performance. Ind Mark Manag 31:515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro CB, Armario EM, Río MES (2005) Consequences of market orientation for customers and employees. Eur J Mark 39(5/6):646–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil T (1980) On the internationalization process of the firm. J Eur Soc Opin Mark Res 8:273–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Y, Coviello NE (2010) Broadening the concept of international entrepreneurship consumers as international entrepreneurs. J World Bus 45:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs JE, Sadrieh F, Annavarjula (2009) Two decades of international entrepreneurship research: What have we learned where do we go from here? Int J Entrep 13:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AC, Woo CY, Dunkelberg WC (1988) Entrepreneurs’ perceived chances for success. J Bus Ventur 3(2):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett AC (2005) Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrep Theory Pract 29(4):473–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello NE, Jones MV (2004) Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. J Bus Ventur 19(4):485–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin DP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strateg Manag J 10(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP (2006) Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationships. Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran J, Blackburn RA (2001) Researching the small enterprise. SAGE, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran J, Jarvis R, Blackburn RA, Black S (1993) Networks and small firms: Constructs methodological strategies and some findings. Int J Small Bus 11(2):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch J, McNaughton R (2003) Beyond market orientation: Knowledge management and the innovativeness of New Zealand firms. Eur J Mark 37(3/4):572–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeds D, Mang P, Frandsen M (2004) The influence of firms’ and industries’ legitimacy on the flow of capital into high-technology ventures. Strateg Organ 2(1):4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierickx I, Cool K, Barney JB (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Manag Sci 35(12):70–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitratos P, Lioukas S, Carter S (2004) The relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment. Int Bus Rev 13(1):19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drury DH, Farhoomand A (1999) Information technology push/pull reactions. J Syst Softw 47(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan R, Weiss A (1979) Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In: Staw B, Cummings LL (eds) Research in organizational behaviour, Vol. 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 75–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers F, Hansen DJ, Davis AE (2011) Examining the relationship between customer and entrepreneurial orientation on nascent firms’ marketing strategy. Int Entrep Manag J. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0173-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):532–550

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson K, Johanson J, Majkgard A, Sharm D (2000) Effect of variation on knowledge accumulation in the internationalization process. Int Stud Manag Organ 30(1):26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao G, Zhou K, Yim C (2007) On what should firms focus in transitional economies? A study of the contingent value of strategic orientation in China. Int J Res Mark 24(1):3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon H, Xuereb J-M (1997) Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J Mark Res 36(1):77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin R (1975) Technology, economic growth and international competitiveness. Study prepared for the subcommittee on economic growth of the congressional joint economic committee. U.S. Government Printing Office US, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P (1995) Habitual owners of small businesses. In: Chittenden F, Robertson M, Marshall I (eds) Small firms: Partnerships for growth. Paul Chapman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann T, Puri M (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. J Finance 57(1):169–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hills GE, Hultman CM, Kraus S, Schulte R (2010) History, theory and evidence of entrepreneurial marketing—an overview. J Entrep Innov Manag 11(1):3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins R (2000) The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure. Entrep Reg Dev 12(2):111–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley RF, Hult GTM (1998) Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J Mark 62:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kyläheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3(3):223–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen A, Nummela N, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S (2008) Strategic orientations of born globals—Do they really matter? J World Bus 43(2):158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson B (2000) Modernizing the industrial district: Rejuvenation or managerial colonisation? In: Vatne E, Taylor M (eds) The networked firm in a global world: Small firms in new environment. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 283–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1977) The internationalization of the firm. A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. J Int Bus Stud 8(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (1990) The mechanism of internationalisation. Int Mark Rev 7(4):11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MV, Coviello N, Tang Y (2011) International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis. J Bus Ventur 26:632–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin H (2006) Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation capabilities in SMEs: An extended model. Eur J Innov Manag 9(4):396–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (1996) The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. In: Cavusgil ST, Madsen TK (eds) Export internationalizing research—enrichment and challenges. JAI Press, New York, pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2005) A taxonomy of born-global firms. Manag Int Rev 45(3):15–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. J Int Bus Stud 19(3):411–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolvereid L, Bullvag E (1993) Novices versus experienced founders: An exploratory investigation. In: Birley S, MacMillan I, Subramony S (eds) Entrepreneurship research: Global perspectives. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 275–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp F, Lindsay NJ, Shoham A (2006) Entrepreneurial, market and learning orientations and international entrepreneurial business venture performance in South African firms. Int Mark Rev 23(6):504–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuivalainen O, Sundqvist S, Servais P (2007) Firms’ degree of born-globalness, international entrepreneurship orientation and export performance. J World Bus 42(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner C, Dowling M, Welpe I (2006) Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrep Reg Dev 1:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner C, Leyronas C (2009) Small business group formation as an entrepreneurial development model. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):645–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lee K, Pennings JM (2001) Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strateg Manag J 22(6/7):615–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SM, Lim S, Pathak R (2011) Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study. Int Entrep Manag J 7(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Cook K, Burt RS (2001) Social capital. Walter de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Fu Z (2011) Relationship between strategic orientation and organizational performance in born global: A critical review. Int J Bus Manag 6(3):109–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. J Bus Ventur 16:429–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan IC (1986) To really learn about entrepreneurship, let’s study habitual entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 1(3):241–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen TK, Servais P (1997) The internationalization of born global start-ups: An evolutionary process? Int Bus Rev 6(6):561–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG, Shapira Z (1987) Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Manag Sci 33(11):1404–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer I, Ebers M (2006) Dynamic of social capital and their performance implications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Adm Sci Q 51(2):262–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy A, Schoorman F, Cooper A (1993) Reinvestment decisions by entrepreneurs: Rational decision-making or escalation of commitment? J Bus Ventur 8(1):9–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall PP, Oviatt BM (2000) International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Acad Manag J 43(5):902–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (1996). Options and the entrepreneur: Towards a strategic theory of entrepreneurial wealth creation. Proc Acad Manag 101–105

  • McGrath R, MacMillan I (2000) The entrepreneurial mindset. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie A, Cedere A (2001) Network pollination: Habitual entrepreneurship and incubators. In: Churchill NC, Bygrave WD, Hornaday JA, Muzyka DF, Vesper KH, Wetzel WE (eds) Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Wellesley, MA, Babson College

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci 29(7):770–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen Ø (2002) The born globals: A new generation of small European exporters. Int Mark Rev 19(2):156–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RE, Strong CA (1998) Market orientation and dimension of strategic orientation. Eur J Mark 32(11):1051–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narver JC, Slater SF (1990) The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J Mark 54(4):20–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummela N, Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K (2004) A global mindset—a prerequisite for successful internationalization? Can J Adm Sci/Rev Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration 21(1):51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt PC (1986) Decision style and strategic decisions of the top executives. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 30(1):39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall P (1993) Toward a theory of international new ventures. J Int Bus Stud 25(1):45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall P (1995) Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Acad Manag Exec 9(2):30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (1997) Challenges for internationalization process theory: The case of international new ventures. Manag Int Rev 37(2):85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall PP (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalisation. Entrep Theory Pract 29(5):537–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peiris I, Akoorie M, Sinha P (2012) International entrepreneurship: A critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research. J Int Entrep. doi:10.1007/s10843-012-00963

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelham A (2000) Market orientation and the other potential influences on performance in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms. J Small Bus Manag 38(1):48–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirolo L, Presutti M (2010) The impact of social capital on the start-up’s performance growth. J Small Bus Manag 48:197–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis D (2008) Does prior start-up experience matter for entrepreneurs’ learning? A comparison between novice and habitual entrepreneurs. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 15(3):472–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presutti M, Boari C, Fratocchi L (2007) Knowledge acquisition and the foreign development of high-tech start-ups: A social capital approach. Int Bus Rev 16(1):23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch A, Wiklund J, Lumpkin GT, Frese M (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):761–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid S (1981) The decision-maker and export entry and expansion. J Int Bus Stud 12(2):101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rerup C (2005) Learning from past experience: Footnotes on mindfulness and habitual entrepreneurship. Scand J Manag 21(4):451–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rialp A, Rialp J, Knight GA (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? Int Bus Rev 14(2):147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruokonen M, Saarenketo S (2009) The strategic orientations of rapidly internationalizing software companies. Eur Bus Rev 21(1):17–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharmak DD, Blomstermo A (2003) Learning in the internationalization process of firms. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkula JM, Baker WE, Noordewier TA (1997) Framework for market-based organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior. J Acad Mark Sci 25(4):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater SF (2001) Market orientation at the beginning of a new millennium. Manag Serv Qual 11(4):230–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater SF, Narver JC (2000) The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication. J Bus Res 48:69–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist S, Kyläheiko K, Kuivalainen O, Cadogan JW (2012) Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurial-oriented behavior in turbulent export markets. Int Mark Rev 29(2):203–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran D, Westhead P, Wright M, Flores M (2010) The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. J Bus Ventur 25(6):541–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran D, Wright M, Westhead P (2003) A longitudinal study of habitual entrepreneurs: Starters and acquirers. Entrep Reg Dev 15(3):207–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adm Sci Q 42:35–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead P, Ucbasaran D, Wright M (2005a) Decisions, actions, and performance: Do novice, serial, and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? J Small Bus Manag 43(4):393–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead P, Ucbasaran D, Wright M, Binks M (2005b) Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Bus Econ 25(2):109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead P, Wright M (1998) Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different? J Bus Ventur 13(3):173–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoh PL (2004) International learning: Antecedents and performance implications among newly internationalizing companies in an exporting context. Int Mark Rev 21(4/5):511–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1989) Case study research: Design and methods, 1st edn. Sage, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (1994) Case study research: Design and methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Beverley Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA (1991) Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 6(4):259–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra S (2005) A theory of international new ventures: A decade of research. J Int Bus Stud 36(1):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra S, Covin J (1993) Business strategy, technology policy and firm performance. Strateg Manag J 14(6):451–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Covin JG (1995) Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur 10(1):43–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA (2000) International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manag J 43(5):925–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Aram JD (1995) Networking and growth of young technology-intensive ventures in China. J Bus Ventur 10(5):349–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L (2007) The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and foreign market knowledge on early internationalisation. J World Bus 42(3):281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Editor, Professor Hamid Etemad, and the three anonymous reviewers who provided valuable and constructive suggestions on a previous draft of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Associate Professor of Management, Department of Management of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Vincenza Odorici & Manuela Presutti

Authors
  1. Vincenza Odorici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuela Presutti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuela Presutti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odorici, V., Presutti, M. The entrepreneurial experience and strategic orientation of high-tech born global start-ups: An analysis of novice and habitual entrepreneurs. J Int Entrep 11, 268–291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-013-0112-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-013-0112-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation