Skip to main content
Log in

When is not not not?

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negated complements of negative implicatives in Vietnamese have a reading in which they are logically equivalent to their non-negated counterpart. We propose an analysis which predicts the distribution of such “pleonastic” occurrences of negation and show that it can account for the distribution of another case of pleonasm in Vietnamese: pleonastic modals. The analysis assumes the possibility of multidominance and contains a proposal on the linearization of syntactic structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrusán, Márta. 2011. “Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers”. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 491–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, Asaf, and Roni Katzir. 2009. “Right-node raising and delayed spellout”. In Interphases: Phase-theoretic investigations of linguistic interfaces, ed. Kleanthes K. Grohmann. Oxford University Press.

  • Biberauer, Theresa, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2012. “Negative Concord in Afrikaans: filling a typological gap”. Journal of Semantics 29: 345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox, and Benjamin Spector. 2012. “The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics”. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, ed. Paul Portner, Claudia Maienborn, and Klaus von Heusinger. De Gruyter.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2012. Problems of projection. Manuscript, MIT.

  • de Vries, Mark. 2009. “On multidominance and linearization”. Biolinguistics 3: 344–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Danny. 2007. “Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures”. In Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, ed. Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva, 71–120. Palgrave-Macmillan.

  • Fox, Danny, and David Pesetsky. 2007. Cyclic linearization of shared material. Ms, Massachussets Institute of Techonology.

  • Heim, Irene. 1994. Puzzling reflexive pronouns in de se reports. Paper presented at Bielefeld Conference on Indexicals, University of Bielefeld.

  • Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47: 340–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. “More structural analogies between pronouns and tense”. In Proceedings of SALT VIII, ed. Devon Strolovitch and Aaron Lawson, 92–110. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. “Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 187–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 1995. “The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items”. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 2010. “How to interpret “expletive” negation under bevor in German”. In Language and Logos. Studies in Theoretical and Computational Linguistics, ed. Thomas Hanneforth and Gisbert Fanselow, volume 72 of Studia Grammatica, 214–236. Akademie Verlag.

  • Magri, Giorgio. 2009. “A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures”. Natural Language Semantics 17: 245–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magri, Giorgio. 2011. “Another argument for embedded scalar implicatures based on oddness in downward entailing environments”. Semantics and Pragmatics 4: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romoli, Jacopo. 2015. “The Presuppositions of Soft Triggers are Obligatory Scalar Implicatures”. Journal of Semantics 32: 173–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauerland, Uli. 2012. “The computation of scalar implicatures: Pragmatic, lexical or grammatical”. Language and Linguistic Compass 6: 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Bernhard, and Rajesh Bhatt. 2006. “Light negation and polarity”. In Crosslinguistic research in syntax and semantics: negation, tense and clausal architecture. Ed. Rafaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul H. Portner, 175–198. Georgetown University Press.

  • Stechow, Arnim von. 2003. “Feature deletion under semantic binding”. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, ed. Makoto Kadowaki and Shigeto Kawahara, volume 33, 377–403. Graduate Linguistic Student Association, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts.

  • Trinh, Tue. 2005. Aspects of Clause Structure in Vietnamese. MA Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.

  • Wilder, Chris. 1995. “Rightward movement as leftward deletion”. In On extraction and extraposition in German, ed. Uli Lutz, and Jürgen Pafel, 273–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, Chris. 2008. “Shared constituents and linearization”. In Topics in ellipsis, ed. Kyle Johnson, 229–258. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2008. Negative Concord is syntactic agreement. Unpublished MS, Amsterdam University.

Download references

Acknowledgements

For valuable input which helped improve the paper, I thank Lisa Cheng, Nicholas Fleisher, Andreas Haida, Claire Halpert, Tim Hunter, Roni Katzir, Hamid Ouali, David Pesetsky, Norvin Richards, the audiences at UWM S-Group, UMN Linguistics Colloquium, ZAS Berlin and TEAL-9, as well as two anonymous reviewers of JEAL. All mistakes are my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tue Trinh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trinh, T. When is not not not?. J East Asian Linguist 26, 411–438 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9163-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-017-9163-z

Keywords

Navigation