Skip to main content
Log in

Intervention effects and wh-construals

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The exploration on wh-intervention effects generally suffers from distributional variations both across and within languages. In this study, a specific, clear divide with respect to wh-intervention effects in Mandarin Chinese is investigated, which in turn sheds light on the puzzling variations in general. I show that the variations of intervention effects cannot be handled in a uniform way. They can be at best captured if we categorize them into two types of syntactic effects, i.e., minimality effect and competition effect, each of which is triggered by independent factors. Meanwhile, to cover the intervention effects crosslinguistically, it is essential to take into account the typological difference of in-situ wh-construals. The various distributions of intervention effects are, then, a natural result of the interplay between the different types of intervention effects and wh-construals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoun Joseph, Audrey Li (1993a) Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 199–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun Joseph, Audrey Li (1993b) On some differences between Chinese and Japanese wh-elements. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker Carl L (1970) Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of Language 6: 197–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-constructions and transparent Logical Form. Ph.D. diss., University of Tuebingen.

  • Beck Sigrid (2006) Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Sigrid, Shin-Sook Kim (1997) On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 339–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck Sigrid, Shin-Sook Kim (2006) Intervention effects in alternative questions. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 165–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti Adriana (1999) “Inversion” as focalization and related questions. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 9–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar, ed. Aafke Hulk and Jean-Yves Pollock, 60–90. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The structure of IP and CP: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Luiggi Rizzi, vol. 2, 16–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Boeckx, Cedric, and Kleanthes Grohmann. 2004. SubMove: Towards a unified account of scrambling and D-linking. In Peripheries, ed. David Adger, Cécil de Cat, and George Tsoulas, 241–257. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Bruening Benjamin, Thuan Tran (2006) Wh-questions in Vietnamese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 319–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the typology of wh−questions. Ph.D. diss., MIT.

  • Cheng, Lisa, and Johan Rooryck. 2002. Types of wh-in-situ, ms., Leiden University.

  • Choe Jae W (1987) LF movement and pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 348–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1991. Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Principles and parameters in comparative grammar, ed. R. Freidin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from building 20, ed. Ken Hale and Jay Keyser. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky Noam (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Cole Peter, Gabriella Hermon (1994) Is there LF wh-movement?. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 239–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins Chris (2004) A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriette. 1992. Intervention effects, monotonicity and scope. In Proceedings of SALT II, ed. C. Barker and D. Dowty, 389–406.

  • Endo, Yoshio. 2007. Locality and information structure: A cartographic approach to Japanese. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

  • Ernst Thomas, Chengchi Wang (1995) Object preposing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 235–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiengo Robert, Robert May (1994) Indices and identity. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, Jason. 2006. Q-feature movement in single and multiple wh−questions in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 8th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar: Minimalist Views on Language Design, ed. Changguk Yim, 61–77. Seoul: The Korean Generative Grammar Circle.

  • Ginsburg, Jason, and Sandiway Fong. 2007. Modeling Q-feature movement in Japanese. In Coyote Papers: The University of Arizona Working Papers in Linguistics, Language and Cognition ed. Jordan Brewer, Polly O’Rourke, and Peter Richtsmeier, vol. 15, 18–39. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.

  • Guerzoni Elena (2006) Intervention effects on NPIs and feature movement: Towards a unified account of intervention. Natural Language Semantics 14: 359–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin Charles L (1973) Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirose Tomio (2003) The syntax of D-linking. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime. 1985. Logical Form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Ph.D. diss., University of Washington, Seattle.

  • Honcoop, Martin. 1997. Dynamic excursions on weak islands. Ph.D. diss., Leiden University.

  • Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Ph.D. diss., MIT.

  • Karttunen Lauri (1977) Syntax and semantics of questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 3–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim Shin-Sook. (2002a) Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 10: 615–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002b. Focus matters: Two types of intervention effect. Paper presented at the 21st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University of California, Santa Cruz.

  • Kim, Shin-Sook. 2005. Focus intervention effects in questions. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (TEAL-3), Harvard University.

  • Kim, Soo-Yeon. 2003. On Beck’s intervention effects. In Studies in generative grammar, vol. 13, 693–708. Seoul: Korean Generative Grammar Circle (KGGC).

  • Ko, Hee-Jeong. 2005. Syntax of wh−in-situ: Merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 867–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred. 2001. For a structured meaning account of questions and answers. In Audiatur Vox Sapientia. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stecho, ed. Caroline Fery and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 287–319. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

  • Kuno, Susumu, and John Whitman. 2004. Licensing of multiple negative polarity items. In Studies in Korean syntax and semantics, ed. Young-Key Kim-Renaud and John Whitman, 207–228. Seoul: International Circle of Korean Linguistics.

  • Kuno, Susumu, and Soo-Yeon Kim. 2004. On syntactic intervention. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, ed. Susumu Kuno, et al., vol. 10, 3–31. Cambridge: Harvard University.

  • Larson Richard K., Robert May (1990) Antecedent containment or vacuous movement: Reply to Baltin. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 103–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Ann (2002) Cantonese sentence-final particles and the CP domain. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 220–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Hui-Chi. 2005. On Chinese focus and cleft constructions. Ph.D. diss., National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.

  • Lee, Mina. 2001. Intervention effects revisited. In Harvard studies in Korean linguistics, ed. Susmu Kuno, et al., vol. 9, 563–572. Cambridge: Harvard University.

  • Lin Jowang, Jane C-C. Tang (1995) Modals as verbs in Chinese: A GB perspective. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 66: 53–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Tzong-Hong. 2001. Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Irvine.

  • May Robert (1985) Logical form: Its structure and derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2004. Intervention effects are syntactic. Class handout.

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru, and Yoshio Endo. 2004. Intervention effects are not pragmatic, ms. MIT and Yokohama National University.

  • Morita, Hisashi. 2002. English and Japanese questions. Ph.D. diss., University of Oxford.

  • Mou, Hoi-Lam. 2008. A study on Cantonese restrictive and additive focus final particles in child acquisition. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1986. Quantification in syntax. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Nishigauchi Taisuke (1990) Quantification in the theory of grammar. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1999. Quantification and wh−constructions. In The handbook of Japanese linguistics, ed. Natsuko Tsujimura, 269–296. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Nissenbaum, Jonathan. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Ph.D. diss., MIT.

  • Obenauer, Hans Georg. 1976. Etudes de syntaxe interrogative du français. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

  • Paul Waltraud (2005) Low IP and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In The representation of (in)definiteness, ed. Eric J. Reuland and Alice ter Meulen, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Pesetsky David (2000) Phrasal movement and its kin. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Radical pragmatics, ed. Peter Cole, 223–255. New York: Academic Press.

  • Reinhart Tanya (1998) Wh-in-situ in the framework of the minimalist program. Natural Language Semantics 6: 29–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards Norvin (2000) An island effect in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards Norvin (2001) Movement in language: Interactions and architectures. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position “Int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax, essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, eds. Guglielmo Cinque and Giampaolo Salvi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. Adriana Belletti, vol. 3, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2006a. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh movement: Moving on, ed. L. Cheng and N. Corver, 97–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 2006b. On intermediate positions: Intervention and impenetrability. Paper presented at EALing 2006, Paris.

  • Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

  • Rooth Mats (1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild Roger (1999) GIVENness, Avoid F, and other constraints on the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shyu Shu-Ing (2001) Remarks on object movement in Mandarin SOV Order. Language and Linguistics 2: 93–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh Hui-Ling (2005) Wh-in-situ in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. Ph.D. diss., University of Geneva.

  • Szabolcsi Anna, Frans Zwarts (1993) Weak islands and an algebraic semantics for scope taking. Natural Language Semantics 1: 235–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Daiko (1990) Negative polarity, phrase structure, and the ECP. English Linguistics 7: 129–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Hidekazu (1997) Invisible movement in SIKA-NAI and the linear crossing constraint. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 143–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Sze-Wing. 1998. Parametrization of features in syntax. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Irvine.

  • Tomioka, Satoshi. 2006. LF intervention effects: Old and new challenges. Paper presented at Workshop in Current Issues in Semantics.

  • Tomioka Satoshi (2007) Pragmatics of LF intervention effects: Japanese and Korean interrogatives. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1570–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. Ph.D. diss., MIT.

  • Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1999. The hows of why and the whys of how. In UCI Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. Francesca Del Gobbo and Hidehito Hoshi, vol. 5, 155–184.

  • Tsai Wei-Tien Dylan (2008) Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 83–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallduvi, Enric. 1992. The information component. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.

  • Vallduvi, Enric. 1995. Structural properties of information packaging in Catalan. In Discourse configurational languages, ed. K. Kiss, 122–153. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • von Stechow, Arnim 1991. Current Issues in the theory of focus. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, ed. A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich, 804–825. Berlin: de Gruyter.

  • Watanabe Akira (1992) Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1: 255–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, Akira. 2003. Wh-in-situ languages. In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory, ed. Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, 203–225. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

  • Watanabe Akira (2004) The genesis of negative concord: Syntax and morphology of negative doubling. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 559–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Jianxin. 1999. Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2008. Intervention effects and the covert component of grammar. Ph.D. diss., National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.

  • Zhang, Niina. 1997. Syntactic dependencies in Mandarin Chinese. Ph.D. diss., University of Toronto.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barry Chung-Yu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, B.CY. Intervention effects and wh-construals. J East Asian Linguist 21, 43–87 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9080-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-011-9080-5

Keywords

Navigation