Abstract
Unlike simpler organisms, C. elegans possesses several distinct chemosensory pathways and chemotactic mechanisms. These mechanisms and pathways are individually capable of driving chemotaxis in a chemical concentration gradient. However, it is not understood if they are redundant or co-operate in more sophisticated ways. Here we examine the specialisation of different chemotactic mechanisms in a model of chemotaxis to NaCl. We explore the performance of different chemotactic mechanisms in a range of chemical gradients and show that, in the model, far from being redundant, the mechanisms are specialised both for different environments and for distinct features within those environments. We also show that the chemotactic drive mediated by the ASE pathway is not robust to the presence of noise in the chemical gradient. This problem cannot be solved along the ASE pathway without destroying its ability to drive chemotaxis. Instead, we show that robustness to noise can be achieved by introducing a second, much slower NaCl-sensing pathway. This secondary pathway is simpler than the ASE pathway, in the sense that it can respond to either up-steps or down-steps in NaCl but not both, and could correspond to one of several candidates in the literature which we identify and evaluate. This work provides one possible explanation of why there are multiple NaCl sensing pathways and chemotactic mechanisms in C. elegans: rather than being redundant the different pathways and mechanism are specialised both for the characteristics of different environments and for distinct features within a single environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appleby, P.A. (2012). A model of chemotaxis and associative learning in C. elegans. Biological Cybernetics, 106, 373–387.
Bargmann, C., & Horvitz, H. (1991). Chemosensory neurons with overlapping functions direct chemotaxis to multiple chemicals in C. elegans. Neuron, 7, 729–42.
Chao, M., Komatsu, H., Fukuto, H., Dionne, H., Hart, A. (2004). Feeding status and serotonin rapidly and reversibly modulate a caenorhabditis elegans chemosensory circuit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101, 15512–15517.
Chen, B., Hall, D., Chklovskii, D. (2006). Wiring optimization can relate neuronal structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 4723–4728.
Dunn, N., Lockery, S., Pierce-Shimomura, J., Conery, J. (2004). A neural network model of chemotaxis predicts functions of synaptic connections in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 17, 137–147.
Eisenbach, M., & Lengeler, J. (2004). Chemotaxis. Imperial College Press.
Ferrée, T., & Lockery, S. (1999). Computational rules for chemotaxis in the nematode C. elegans. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 6, 263–277.
Hall, D., & Russell, R. (1991). The posterior nervous system of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: serial reconstruction of identified neurons and complete pattern of synaptic interactions. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 122.
Hills, T., Brockie, P., Maricq, A. (2004). Dopamine and glutamate control area-restricted search behavior in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1217–1225.
Hukema, R., Rademakers, S., Dekkers, M., Burghoorn, J., Jansen, G. (2006). Antagonistic sensory cues generate gustatory plasticity in caenorhabditis elegans. EMBO Journal, 25, 312–322.
Iino, Y., & Yoshida, K. (2009). Parallel use of two behavioural mechanisms for chemotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5370–5380.
Izquierdo, E., & Lockery, S. (2010). Evolution and analysis of minimal neural circuits for klinotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 12908–12917.
Miller, A., Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Moravec, M., Lockery, S. (2005). Step-response analysis of chemotaxis in caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3369–3378.
Nuttley, W., Atkinson-Leadbeater, K., van der Kooy, D. (2002). Serotonin mediates food-odor associative learning in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 12449–12454.
Pierce-Shimomura, J., Dores, M., Lockery, S. (2005). Analysis of the effects of turning bias on chemotaxis in C. elegans. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 4727–4733.
Pierce-Shimomura, J., Morse, T., Lockery, S. (1999). The fundamental role of pirouettes in caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9557–9569.
Saeki, S., Yamamoto, M., Iino, Y. (2001). Plasticity of chemotaxis revealed by paired presentation of a chemoattractant and starvation in the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Experimental Biology, 204, 1757–1764.
Sambongi, Y., Nagae, T., Liu, Y., Yoshimizu, T., Takeda, K., Wada, Y., Futai, M. (1999). Sensing of cadmium and copper ions by externally exposed adl, ase, and ash neurons elicits avoidance response in caenorhabditis elegans. NeuroReport, 10, 753–757.
Stetak, A., Horndli, F., Maricq, A., van den Heuvel, S., Hajnal, A. (2009). Neuron-specific regulation of associative learning and memory by magi-1 in C. elegans. PLoS ONE, 4, e6019.
Suzuki, H., Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Ezcurra, M., Lockery, S., Schafer, W. (2008). Functional asymmetry in caenorhabditis elegans taste neurons and its computational role in chemotaxis. Nature, 454, 114–117.
Thiele, T., Faumont, S., Lockery, S. (2009). The neural network for chemotaxis to tastants in caenorhabditis elegans is specialized for temporal differentiation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11904–11911.
Torayama, I., Ishihara, T., Katsura, I. (2007). Caenorhabditis elegans integrates the signals of butanone and food to enhance chemotaxis to butanone. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 741–50.
Ward, S. (1973). Chemotaxis by the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: identification of attractants and analysis of the response by use of mutants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 70, 817–821.
Ward, S., Thomson, N., White, J.G., Brenner, S. (1975). Electron microscopical reconstruction of the anterior sensory anatomy of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 160, 313–337.
Ware, R., Clark, D., Crossland, K., Russell, R. (1975). The nerve ring of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans: sensory input and motor output. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 162, 71–110.
White, J., Southgate, E., Thomson, J., Brenner, S. (1986). The structure of the nervous system of the nematode C. elegans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 314, 1–340.
Zhao, B., Khare, P., Feldman, L., Dent, J. (2003). Reversal frequency in caenorhabditis elegans represents an integrated response to the state of the animal and its environment. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 5319–5328.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Action Editor: C. Linster
Conflict of interests
No conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Appleby, P.A. The role of multiple chemotactic mechanisms in a model of chemotaxis in C. elegans: different mechanisms are specialised for different environments. J Comput Neurosci 36, 339–354 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-013-0474-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-013-0474-4