Skip to main content
Log in

The Experiment of Foster Care

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sought to provide a new framework for understanding the training and ongoing support of foster parents. The experiences of authorized foster parents were viewed in the context of an experiment, whereby foster parents entered an out-of-home care placement with preconceived ideas and expectations of what the provision of care would be like. We have investigated the experience of foster care from the perspective of the foster parent who tests expectations of providing care as one might conduct any experiment. Focus group discussion yielded five global domains of foster care experience: birth family, motivation, agency influences, relationship impacts, and attachment. Foster carers commonly described these domains as central to the overall experience of providing foster care. Furthermore, specific experiences within each domain were seen to either encourage or discourage the further provision of foster care. Individual interviews regarding the practical experiences related to these domains uncovered struggles of foster parents who sought to understand their role identity as a “foster parent”, and their self identity as a “mother”. We discuss implications arising from the experience of these domains of care and their related struggles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, G. (2001). The motives of foster parents, their family and work circumstances. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbell, K., & Wright, L. (1999). Family foster care in the next century. Child Welfare, 78, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, R. P. (2001). Policy implications of foster family characteristics. Family Relations, 50, 16–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A. C., Crase, S. J., & Crase, K. L. (2001). Influences on the decision to become or not become a foster parent. Families in Society, 82, 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Calder, P. (2000). Concept mapping the needs of foster parents. Child Welfare, 79, 729–746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buehler, C., Cox, M. E., & Cuddeback, G. (2003). Foster parents’ perceptions of factors that promote or inhibit successful fostering. Qualitative Social Work, 2, 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dando, I., & Minty, B. (1987). What makes good foster parents? British Journal of Social Work, 17, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denby, R., & Rindfleisch, N. (1996). African Americans’ foster parenting experiences: Research findings and implications for policy and practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 523–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denby, R., Rindfleisch, N., & Bean, G. (1999). Predictors of foster parents’ satisfaction and intent to continue to foster. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 287–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, M., Stovall, K. C., Albus, K. E., & Bates, B. (2001). Attachment for infants in foster care: The role of caregiver state of mind. Child Development, 72, 1467–1477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fanshel, D., & Shinn, E. B. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folman, R. D. (1998). “I was tooken”: How children experience removal from their parents preliminary to placement into foster care. Adoption Quarterly, 2, 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, Y., Fortin, G., & Jeliu, G. (2004). Clinical application of attachment theory in permanency planning for children in foster care: The importance of continuity of care. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, R. (1996). The foster carer experience in Ireland: Findings from a postal survey. Child: Care, Health and Development, 22, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis-Arnold, R., Crase, S. J., Stockdale, D. F., & Shelley, M. C. (1998). Parenting attitudes, foster parenting attitudes, and motivations of adoptive and nonadoptive foster parent trainees. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 715–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, P., & Mulroney, L. (2003). Assessment record, step by step: A compentency based resource for assessing potential foster carers. Sydney: Association of Children’s Welfare Agencies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D., & Fearnley, S. (2003). Disorders of attachment in adopted and fostered children: Recognition and treatment. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, V. P. (2002). The fuzzy foster parenting: A theoretical approach. The Social Science Journal, 39, 625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. (1996). Introduction to the special section on attachment and psychopathology: Part 1. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Prohn, N. S. (1994). The role of the kinship foster parent: A comparison of the role conceptions of relative and non-relative foster parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 16, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzini, R., Sassaroli, S., & Rocchi, M. T. (1989). Schizophrenia and paranoia as solutions to predictive failure. International Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 2, 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, T. E., Rodger, S., Cummings, A. L., & Leschied, A. W. (2006). The needs of foster parents: A qualitative study of motivation, support, and retention. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, R. E., Fried, C., & Britner, P. A. (2000). Predictors of placement outcomes in treatment foster care: Implications for foster parent selection and service delivery. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 9, 425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., & Crean, T. (1997). A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1042–1047.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G., & Beek, M. (2005). Providing a secure base: Parenting children in long-term foster family care. Attachment and Human Development, 7, 3–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, L. (1993). Consumer empowerment in the Massachusetts mental health system: A comparison of attitudes, perceptions, and opinions within and between provider groups. Doctoral dissertation. Boston University, School of social work, Boston.

  • Stovall, K. C., & Dozier, M. (1998). Infants in foster care: An attachment theory perspective. Adoption Quarterly, 2, 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stovall-McClough, K. C., & Dozier, M. (2004). Forming attachments in foster care: Infant attachment behaviors during the first 2 months of placement. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 253–271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Special thanks is extended to CareSouth, Nowra, NSW, and their foster carers. Without their participation and support, this research would not have been possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerard J. Stoyles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broady, T.R., Stoyles, G.J., McMullan, K. et al. The Experiment of Foster Care. J Child Fam Stud 19, 559–571 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9330-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9330-6

Keywords

Navigation