Skip to main content
Log in

On the intergenerational transmission of preferences

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics Aims and scope

Abstract

Recent contributions in economics have argued for a re-introduction of preference-based approaches to economic behavior and have called for an empirical investigation of preferences in order to overcome the prevalent skepticism against such explanations within the discipline. The present paper contributes to this discussion by assessing the extent, specificity, and malleability of preference transmission from parents to their children, and thus provides evidence for the clustering of preferences along family lines. Using data on eight activity choices from the British Household Panel Survey, we find strong (and positive) correlations between preferences of parents and their adult children. These correlations are found to be robust to a wide number of robustness checks but to vary considerably across activities, suggesting that parents may have more influence over some preferences than over others. Further investigations also show that this influence is surprisingly robust to a wide number of potentially intervening factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allcott H. (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95(9–10): 1082–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anger, S. (2011). The intergenerational transmission of cognitive and non-cognitive skills during adolescence and young adulthood. IZA Discussion Paper No. 5749. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

  • Angrist J. D. (2001) Estimation of limited dependent variable models with dummy endogenous regressors: Simple strategies for empirical practice. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 19(1): 2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arránz Becker O., Lois D. (2010) Selection, alignment, and their interplay: Origins of lifestyle homogamy in couple relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(5): 1234–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks J., Blundell R., Lewbel A. (1997) Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics 79(4): 527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barseghyan L., Prince J., Teitelbaum J. C. (2011) Are risk preferences stable across contexts? Evidence from insurance data. American Economic Review 101(2): 591–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G. S. (1965) A Theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75(299): 493–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker G. S. (1976) The Economic approach to human behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers R. (2007) Intergenerational transmission of volunteering. Acta Sociologica 50(2): 99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell A. P. (1969) Role modeling of fathers in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Counseling Psychology 16(1): 30–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin A., Verdier T. (2000) “Beyond the melting pot”: Cultural transmission, marriage, and the evolution of ethnic and religious traits. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 955–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin A., Verdier T. (2011) The economics of cultural transmission and socialization. In: Benhabib J., Bisin A., Jackson M. O. (eds) Handbook of social economics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 339–416

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. E., & Devereux, P. J. (2011). Recent developments in intergenerational mobility. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Bd. 4 (5), pp. 1487–1541). Amsterdam: North Holland.

  • Blanden J., Goodman A., Gregg P., Machin S. (2002) Changes in intergenerational mobility in Britain. London School of Economics and Political Science, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles S., Gintis H., Groves M. O. (2005) Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R., Richerson P. J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brügger, B., Lalive, R., & Zweimüller, J. (2009). Does culture affect unemployment? Evidence from the Röstigraben. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4283. Bonn: The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

  • Caplan B. (2003) Stigler-Becker versus Myers-Briggs: Why preference-based explanations are scientifically meaningful and empirically important. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 50(4): 391–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso A. R., Fontainha E., Monfardini C. (2010) Children’s and parents’ time use: Empirical evidence on investment in human capital in France, Germany and Italy. Review of Economics of the Household 8(4): 479–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, A. C., & Katz, L. F. (1991). The company you keep: The effects of family and neighborhood on disadvantaged youths. NBER Working Paper No. 3705. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Caspi A., Roberts B. W., Shiner R. L. (2005) Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology 56: 453–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collado M. D., Ortuño-Ortín I., Romeu A. (2012) Intergenerational linkages in consumption patterns and the geographical distirbution of surnames. Regional Science and Urban Economics 42(1–2): 341–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordes C. (2004) The human adaptation for culture and its behavioral implications. Journal of Bioeconomics 6(2): 143–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordes C. (2009) Changing your role model: Social learning and the Engel curve. The Journal of Socio-Economics 38: 957–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (Feabruary 2011). Under-18 and under-16 conception statistics. Accessed 18 November 2011, from http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/e/england%20under%2018%20and%20under%2016%20conception%20statistics%201998-2009%20feb%202011.pdf

  • Doepke M., Zilibotti F. (2008) Occupational choice and the spirit of capitalism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 747–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U. (2012) The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Review of Economic Studies 79(2): 645–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dow G. K., Juster F. T. (1985) Goods, time, and well-being: The joint dependence problem. In: Juster F. T., Stafford F. P. (eds) Time, goods, and well-being. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp 397–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan G., Kalil A., Mayer S. E., Tepper R., Payne M. R. (2005) The apple does not fall far from the tree. In: Bowles S., Gintis H., Groves M. O. (eds) Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 23–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Efferson C., Lalive R., Richerson P. J., McElreath R., Lubell M. (2008) Conformists and mavericks: The empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior 29: 56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández R., Fogli A. (2009) Culture: An empirical investigation of beliefs, work, and fertility. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1(1): 146–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández R., Fogli A., Olivetti C. (2004) Mothers and sons: Preference formation and female labor force dynamics. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4): 1249–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth F. G. (1960) The relationship between family size and family expenditure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 123(4): 367–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman M. (1962) Price theory. A provisional text. Aldine, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger A. S. (1979) Heritability. Economica 46(184): 327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouskova E., Chiteji N. S., Stafford F. P. (2010) Pension participation: Do parents transmit time preference?. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 31(2): 138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallberg D. (2003) Synchronous leisure, jointness and household labor supply. Labour Economics 10(2): 185–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris J. R. (1995) Where is the child’s environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review 102(3): 458–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich J., McElreath R. (2007) Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In: Dunbar R. I., Barrett L. (eds) The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 555–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Houts R. M., Robins E., Huston T. L. (1996) Compatibility and the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 58(1): 7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard D. R. (1976) Multivariate relationships between leisure activities and personality. Research Quarterly 47(2): 226–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Wakker P. P., Sarin R. (1997) Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2): 375–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn M., Bernasco W. (2001) Joint and separated lifestyles in couple relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family 63(3): 639–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapteyn A., Geer v. d. S., van de Stadt H., Wansbeek T. (1997) Interpendent preferences: An econometric analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12: 665–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger A. B., Kahnemann D., Schkade D., Schwarz N., Stone A. A. (2009) National time accounting: The currency of life. In: Krueger A. B. (eds) Measuring subjective well-being of nations: National accounts of time use and well-being. Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp 9–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein H. (1950) Bandwagon, Snob and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. Quarterly Journal of Economics 64(2): 183–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro M. L., Sanz-de-Galdeano A., Vuri D. (2010) Smoking habits: Like father, like son, like mother, like daughter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 72(6): 717–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, A. L., Monfardini, C., & Pasqua, S. (October 2011). On intergenerational transmission of reading habits in italy: Is a good example the best sermon? IZA Discussion Paper #6038. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

  • Manski C. (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer J., Meier A. (2008) Smooth it like the “Jonses”? Estimating peer-group effects in intertemporal consumption choice. The Economic Journal 118: 454–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazumder B. (2005) The apple falls even closer to the tree than we thought. New and revised estimates of the intergenerational inhertiance of earnings. In: Bowles S., Gintis H., Groves M. O. (eds) Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • McElreath R., Bell A. V., Efferson C., Lubell M., Richerson P. J., Waring T. (2008) Beyond existence and aiming outside the laboratory: Estimating frequency-dependent and pay-off-biased social learning strategies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 3515–3528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan C. B. (1998) Parental priorities and economic inequality. University Of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R., DeFries J. C., McClearn G. E., McGuffin P. (2008) Behavioral genetics. Worth, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak R. A. (1978) Endogenous tastes in demand and welfare analysis. The American Economic Review 68(2): 374–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendell L., Fogarty L., Hoppitt W. J., Morgan T. J., Webster M. M., Laland K. N. (2011) Cognitive culture: Theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(2): 68–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson P. J., Boyd R. (2005) Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss R. R., VandenHeuvel A. (1990) Cohabitation: A orecursor to marriage or an alternative to being single?. Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J. P., Godbey G. (1997) Time for life: The surprising ways American use their time. Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt C. M., Tauchmann H. (2011) Heterogeneity in the intergenerational transmission of alcohol consumption: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Health Economics 30(1): 33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky T. (1992) The joyless economy: The psychology of human satisfaction. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman I. (2001) Consumption takes time: Implications for economic theory. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steedman I. (2007) What shall I do? (Or why consumer theory should focus on time-use and activities, rather than on commodities). In: Bianchi M. (eds) The evolution of consumption: Theory and practices. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 31–41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G. J., Becker G. S. (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. The American Economic Review 67(2): 76–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor M. F., Brice J., Buck N., Prentice-Lane E. (2010) British household panel survey user manual. Volume A: Introduction, technical report and appendices. University of Essex, Clochester

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008) Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Torra V., Domingo-Ferrer J., Mateo-Sanz J. M., Ng M. (2006) Regression for ordinal variables without underlying continuous variables. Information Sciences 176(4): 465–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg S. G. (1972) Assortative mating, or who marries whom?. Behavior Genetics 2(2–3): 127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorpostel M., Van der Lippe T., Gershuny J. (2009) Trends in free time with a partner: A transformation of intimacy?. Social Indicators Research 93(1): 165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldkirch A., Ng S., Cox D. (2004) Intergenerational linkages in consumption behavior. The Journal of Human Ressources 39(2): 355–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm M. O., Brown E., Rooney P. M., Steinberg R. (2008) The intergenerational transmission of generosity. Journal of Public Economics 92(10–11): 2146–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (2001) Learning to consume—A theory of wants and the growth of demand. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 11(5): 23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (2005). From sensory to positivist utilitarianism and back—The rehabilitation of naturalistic conjectures in the theory of demand. Papers on Economics & Evolution #0507. Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.

  • Witt, U., & Schubert, C. (2010). Extending the informational basis of welfare economics: The case of preference dynamics. Papers on Economics & Evolution # 1005. Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.

  • Young D. (1996) Changing tastes and endogenous preferences: Some issues in modelling the demand for agricultural products. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(3): 281–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A. (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57(298): 348–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Volland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Volland, B. On the intergenerational transmission of preferences. J Bioecon 15, 217–249 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9149-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9149-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation