Skip to main content
Log in

A simple and efficient method for preparation of isolated ovarian follicles for transmission electron microscopy

  • Technical Innovations
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

A simple method for preparation of isolated ovarian follicles for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using transwell inserts is described.

Materials and methods

Pre-antral follicles were enzymatically isolated from mouse ovaries and cultured overnight on transwell insert polyester membranes. The following day, isolated ovarian follicles were processed for TEM by moving the transwell insert through successive wells containing the fixation and embedding reagents. After polymerization of the resin, the polyester membrane with the follicles embedded in the resin was disengaged from the transwell unit. The resin was sectioned. Semi-thin sections were stained with toluidine blue while ultra-thin sections were stained by uranyl acetate and examined by light microscopy and TEM, respectively.

Results

Isolated ovarian follicles were easily processed in groups for TEM. Follicles were well embedded and there appeared to be no loss of tissue during processing. The ultra-structure of processed isolated ovarian follicles was well preserved with little evidence of processing artifacts.

Conclusions

In situ processing and preparation of isolated ovarian follicles by first allowing attachment on transwell insert membranes was shown to be a simple, rapid and effective method for TEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Falcone T, Bedaiwy MA. Fertility preservation and pregnancy outcome after malignancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;17:21–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meirow D. Fertility preservation in cancer patients using stored ovarian tissue: clinical aspects. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2008;15:536–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dolmans MM, Michaux N, Camboni A, Martinez-Madrid B, Van Langendonckt A, Nottola SA, et al. Evaluation of Liberase, a purified enzyme blend, for the isolation of human primordial and primary ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Camboni A, Martinez-Madrid B, Dolmans MM, Amorim CA, Nottola SA, Donnez J, et al. Preservation of fertility in young cancer patients: contribution of transmission electron microscopy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:136–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eyden B, Radford J, Shalet SM, Thomas N, Brison DR, Lieberman BA. Ultrastructural preservation of ovarian cortical tissue cryopreserved in dimethylsulfoxide for subsequent transplantation into young female cancer patients. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2004;28:239–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurst PR, Mora JM, Fenwick MA. Caspase-3, TUNEL and ultrastructural studies of small follicles in adult human ovarian biopsies. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1974–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keros V, Xella S, Hultenby K, Pettersson K, Sheikhi M, Volpe A, et al. Vitrification versus controlled-rate freezing in cryopreservation of human ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(7):1670–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cortvrindt R, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem AC. A morphological and functional study of the effect of slow freezing followed by complete in-vitro maturation of primary mouse ovarian follicles. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2648–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pangas SA, Saudye H, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. Novel approach for the three-dimensional culture of granulosa cell-oocyte complexes. Tissue Eng. 2003;9:1013–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nottola SA, Heyn R, Camboni A, Correr S, Macchiarelli G. Ultrastructural characteristics of human granulosa cells in a coculture system for in vitro fertilization. Microsc Res Tech. 2006;69:508–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wood JI, Klomparens KL. Characterization of agarose as an encapsulation medium for particulate specimens for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc Res Tech. 1993;25:267–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hyttel P, Madsen I. Rapid method to prepare mammalian oocytes and embryos for transmission electron microscopy. Acta Anat (Basel). 1987;129:12–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe S, Sasaki J, Wada T, Tanaka Y, Otsuka N. Low gel temperature agarose encapsulation of small specimens for electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo). 1988;37:89–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taupin P. A simple and direct pre-embedding technique for ultrastructure of scarce biological specimens. Biotech Histochem. 2008;83:253–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohenberg H, Mannweiler K, Muller M. High-pressure freezing of cell suspensions in cellulose capillary tubes. J Microsc. 1994;175:34–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazia D, Schatten G, Sale W. Adhesion of cells to surfaces coated with polylysine. Applications to electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1975;66:198–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raje M, Dhiman R, Majumdar S, Dass T, Dikshit KL, Kaur R. Charged nylon membrane substrate for convenient and versatile high resolution microscopic analysis of Escherichia coli & mammalian cells in suspension culture. Cytotechnology. 2006;51:111–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalen H, Nevalainen TJ. Direct epoxy embedding for vertical sectioning of cells grown as a monolayer on millipore filter. Stain Technol. 1968;43:217–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Enlander D, Tobey RA, Scott T. Cell cycle-dependent surface changes in Chinese hamster cells grown in suspension culture. Exp Cell Res. 1975;95:396–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dalen H. A filtration technique for preparing cells in suspension for electron microscopy. J Microsc. 1970;91:213–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Ewijk W, Hosli P. A new method for comparative light and electron microscopic studies of individual cells, selected in the living state. J Microsc. 1975;105:19–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gabridge MG, Dougherty EP. Improved method for transmission electron microscopy of ciliated cell monolayers maintained on gas-permeable membranes. J Microsc. 1983;132:165–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nopanitaya W, Charlton RK, Turchin Jr RL, Grisham JW. Ultrastructure of cells cultured on polycarbonate membranes. Stain Technol. 1977;52:143–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ. Development in vitro of mouse oocytes from primordial follicles. Biol Reprod. 1996;54:197–207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Adam AA, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M. In vitro culture of mouse preantral follicles using membrane inserts and developmental competence of in vitro ovulated oocytes. J Reprod Dev. 2004;50:579–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Desai N, AbdelHafez F, Ali M, Sayed E, Abu-Alhassan A, Falcone T, et al. Mouse ovarian follicle cryopreservation using vitrification or slow programmed cooling: assessment of in vitro development, maturation, ultrastructure and meiotic spindle organization. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2009; Accepted after revision.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Desai.

Additional information

Financial support: None

Capsule

Use of transwell insert membranes as a vehicle for the preparation of isolated ovarian follicles for TEM is a very simple and easy technique.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desai, N., AbdelHafez, F., Drazba, J. et al. A simple and efficient method for preparation of isolated ovarian follicles for transmission electron microscopy. J Assist Reprod Genet 27, 97–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9389-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9389-4

Keywords

Navigation