Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Why Milk Consumption is the Bigger Problem: Ethical Implications and Deaths per Calorie Created of Milk Compared to Meat Production

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pictures of sides of beef, hanging from overhead rails in refrigerated warehouses and meat-processing plants, often leave a feeling of unease. These pictures provoke the notion that human beings have no right to inflict suffering and death on other sentient beings for the sole purpose of providing food. However, the ethical analysis conducted in this study shows that meat production, if animal welfare and deaths per calorie created are considered, is less of a pressing problem compared to the production of milk. While meat can be provided with minimal suffering to animals, the consumption of milk is always associated with considerable suffering during the dairy cow’s life-span and the lives of their offspring. Moreover, more bovine deaths per unit of calorific value created are associated with milk production compared to meat production. The vegan movement, which is currently growing, wishes to minimise farm animal suffering as much as possible. However, if a vegan diet is not possible, consumers should make an informed decision about the products they consume. Replacement of the calories obtained from meat with those from milk and dairy products is not rational if animal welfare is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Milk cows are bred to produce as much milk as possible. They therefore produce more milk than calves drink.

References

  • Acton, A. (2013). Issues in ethical research and application Atlanta. Atlanta: ScholarlyEditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. (1991). Suffering animals in a greens landscape? Dairy Farmer, 38(5), 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, K., & Graber, R. (2012). Mutterkuhhaltung Graz. New York: Leopold Stocker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, E. M., Jarvis, S., Sherwood, L., Robson, S. K., Ormandy, E., Farish, M., et al. (2009). Indicators of piglet survival in an outdoor farrowing system. Livestock Science, 124(1), 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beever, D. (2013). Management issues with dry cows and a new feeding system for improved health, welfare and performance. In H. P. S. Makkar (Ed.), Enhancing animal welfare and farmer income through strategic animal feeding—Some CASE STUDIES (pp. 59–68). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belshaw, C. (2016). Death, pain, and animal life. In T. Višak & R. Garner (Eds.), The ethics of killing animals (pp. 32–50). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bestman, M. W. P., & Wagenaar, J. P. (2003). Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens. Livestock Production Science, 80(1), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatti, S. (2012). Death’s distinctive harm. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(4), 317–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blokhuis, H. J., & Wiepkema, P. R. (1998). Studies of feather pecking in poultry. Veterinary Quarterly, 20(1), 6–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehncke, E. (1997). Preventive strategies as a health resource for organic farming. In I. Isart & J. J. Llerena (Eds.), Resource use in organic farmingProceedings of the 3rd ENOF workshop (pp. 25–35). Acona.

  • Bradley, B. (2016). Is death bad for a cow? In T. Višak & R. Garner (Eds.), The ethics of killing animals (pp. 51–64). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caulfield, M. P., Cambridge, H., Foster, S. F., & McGreevy, P. D. (2014). Heat stress: A major contributor to poor animal welfare associated with long-haul live export voyages. The Veterinary Journal, 199(2), 223–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciocchetti, C. (2012). Veganism and living well. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25(3), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, W. J. (2009). Health effects of vegan diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89(5), 1627S–1633S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, U. (2011). Kühe halten. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer KG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckers, J. (2009). Vegetarianism, sentimental or ethical? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(6), 573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demeter USA. 2018. Animal welfare. http://www.demeter-usa.org/learn-more/animal-welfare.asp. Accessed 27 June 2018.

  • Düpjan, S., & Puppe, B. (2016). Abnormal behaviour with a focus on stereotypies—Indicators of suffering and impaired welfare? Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 129(3–4), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré, M. (2016). The impact of connectivity on nutritional purchases. Mintel Group (8-11-2017).

  • Dwyer, J. (2013). Vegetarian Diets. In B. Caballero (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human nutrition, third (edition ed., pp. 316–322). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2007). Council regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:189:0001:0023:EN:PDF. Accessed 17 May 2017.

  • European Commission. (2015). Special Eurobarometer 442—attitude of Europeans towards animal welfare. http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/SPECIAL/surveyKy/2096. Accessed 10 June 2018.

  • Fischer, B. (2016). You can’t buy your way out of veganism. Between the Species, 19(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. A. (2006). Why we should be vegetarians. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 20(2), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N., & Ward, K. (2008). Health, ethics and environment: A qualitative study of vegetarian motivations. Appetite, 50(2–3), 422–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. F., & Broom, D. M. (1997). Farm animal behaviour and welfare. Oxon: Cab International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, G. F. 31-1-2015. Umfrage: Vegetarier möchten viel lieber vegan leben. https://www.vegan.eu/vegetarier_lieber_vegan/#comments. Accessed 1 June 2018.

  • Geers, R., Petersen, B., Huysmans, K., Knura-Deszczka, S., De Becker, M., Gymnich, S., et al. (2003). On-farm monitoring of pig welfare by assessment of housing, management, health records and plasma haptoglobin. Animal Welfare, 12(4), 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilani, A. M., Knowles, T. G., & Nicol, C. J. (2013). The effect of rearing environment on feather pecking in young and adult laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 148(1), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick-Bauer, M., & Yeh, M. C. (2014). The health advantage of a vegan diet: Exploring the gut microbiota connection. Nutrients, 6(11), 4822–4838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., Hansson, I., Ekman, T., Emanuelson, U., & Forslund, K. (2002). Health of cows, calves and young stock on 26 organic dairy herds in Sweden. The Veterinary Record, 150, 503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, I., Hamilton, C., Ekman, T., & Forslund, K. (2001). Carcass quality in certified organic production compared with conventional livestock production. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B, 47(2), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardeng, F., & Edge, V. L. (2001). Mastitis, ketosis, and milk fever in 31 organic and 93 conventional Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 84, 2673–2679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, W., & Geisel, J. (2002). Vegetarian lifestyle and monitoring of vitamin B-12 status. Clinica Chimica Acta, 326(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultgren, J., Wiberg, S., Berg, C., Cvek, K., & Lunner Kolstrup, C. (2014). Cattle behaviours and stockperson actions related to impaired animal welfare at Swedish slaughter plants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 152, 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. R. (2003). Bioavailability of iron, zinc, and other trace minerals from vegetarian diets. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3), 633S–639S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM 2012. The IFOAM norms for organic production and processing. https://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/page/files/ifoam_norms_version_august_2012_with_cover.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2018.

  • Janssen, M., Busch, C., Rüdiger, M., & Hamm, U. (2016). Motives of consumers following a vegan diet and their attitudes towards animal agriculture. Appetite, 105, 643–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, J. F., de Passille, A. M., Mejdell, C. M., Bøe, K. E., Grøndahl, A. M., Beaver, A., et al. (2015). The effect of nursing on the cow-calf bond. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 163, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, J. F., Zipp, K. A., Kälber, T., Passillé, A. M. D., Knierim, U., Barth, K., et al. (2016). Is rearing calves with the dam a feasible option for dairy farms? Current and future research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 181, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperbauer, T. J., & Sandøe, P. (2016). Killing as a welfare issue. In T. Višak & R. Garner (Eds.), The ethics of killing animals (pp. 17–31). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, L., & Jensen, P. (2017). Abnormal behaviour, stress and welfare. In P. Jensen (Ed.), The ethology of domestic animals (pp. 119–134). Oxfordshire: CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kenyon, P. M., & Barker, M. E. (1998). Attitudes towards meat-eating in vegetarian and non-vegetarian teenage girls in England—An ethnographic approach. Appetite, 30(2), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlenberg-Mueller, K., & Raschka, L. (2003). Calcium balance in young adults on a vegan and lactovegetarian diet. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, 21(1), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, T. L., & Sabaté, J. (2014). Beyond meatless, the health effects of vegan diets: Findings from the adventist cohorts. Nutrients, 6(6), 2131–2147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomasky, L. (2013). Is it wrong to eat animals? Social Philosophy and Policy, 30(1–2), 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longworth, J. W. (1983). Beef in Japan. Politics, production, marketing & trade. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luescher, U. A., & Hurnik, J. F. (1987). Contribution to a concept of behavioral abnormalities in farm animals under confinement. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare sciences 1986/87 (pp. 67–76). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lupoli, B. E. R. I., Johansson, B. I. R. G., Uvnäs-Moberg, K. E. R. S., & Svennersten-Sjaunja, K. E. R. S. (2001). Effect of suckling on the release of oxytocin, prolactin, cortisol, gastrin, cholecystokinin, somatostatin and insulin in dairy cows and their calves. Journal of Dairy Research, 2001(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, R., Whay, H. R., Klement, E., & Nicol, C. J. (2016). Invited review: Environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(3), 1695–1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheny, G. (2003). Least harm: A defense of vegetarianism from Steven Davis’s omnivorous proposal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 16(5), 505–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meert, K. L., Shear, K., Newth, C. J., Harrison, R., Berger, J., Zimmerman, J., et al. (2011). Follow-up study of complicated grief among parents eighteen months after a child’s death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(2), 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, J. (2018). Death-free dairy? The ethics of clean milk. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullee, A., Vermeire, L., Vanaelst, B., Mullie, P., Deriemaeker, P., Leenaert, T., et al. (2017). Vegetarianism and meat consumption: A comparison of attitudes and beliefs between vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, and omnivorous subjects in Belgium. Appetite, 114, 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narveson, J. (1987). Case against Animal Rights. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare sciences 1986/87 (pp. 191–204). Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Naturland E.V. (2017). A one-to-one comparison of the EU organic regulation with the Naturland. https://www.naturland.de/images/UK/Naturland/Naturland_Standards/Comparison_Naturland-EC-organic-regulation.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2018.

  • Niggli, U. L. W. (1996). Development of research in organic agriculture. In T. V. Østergaard (Ed.), Fundamentals of organic agriculture. Copenhagen: 11th IFOAM International Scientific Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. (2014). Sample registration system baseline survey 2014. India. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/BASELINE%20TABLES07062016.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2018.

  • Oswald, C. J. (2016). Moral vegetarianism and the philosophy of mind. Stance, 9, 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J. (2011). The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives? Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1791–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson, I. C., Weeks, C. A., & Nicol, C. J. (2017). Provision of a resource package reduces feather pecking and improves ranging distribution on free-range layer farms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, E. O., Harris, J. E., Borgwardt, R. E., Sween, M. L., & Connor, J. M. (2003). Fenceline contact of beef calves with their dams at weaning reduces the negative effects of separation on behavior and growth rate. Journal of Animal Sciences, 81(1), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigerson, H. G., Shear, M. K., Jacobs, S. C., Reynolds, C. F., Maciejewski, P. K., Davidson, J. R., et al. (1999). Consensus criteria for traumatic grief. A preliminary empirical test. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purves, D. (2016). Accounting for the harm of death. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 97(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radnitz, C., Beezhold, B., & DiMatteo, J. (2015). Investigation of lifestyle choices of individuals following a vegan diet for health and ethical reasons. Appetite, 90, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhardt, V. (2002). Artificial weaning of calves: Benefits and costs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 5(3), 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson, J. (2014). A-time to die: A growing block account of the evil of death. Philosophia, 42(4), 911–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. H., Floyd, F. J., Seltzer, M. M., Greenberg, J., & Hong, J. (2008). Long-term effects of the death of a child on parents’ adjustment in midlife. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(2), 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. E. (1995). Farm animal welfare. Social, bioethical, and research issues. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, B. A., Barth, K., Gygax, L., & Hillmann, E. (2009). Influence of artificial vs. mother-bonded rearing on sucking behaviour, health and weight gain in calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 119(3–4), 143–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santurtun, E., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2015). The impact of vehicle motion during transport on animal welfare. Research in Veterinary Science, 100(Supplement C), 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehulova, I., Lidfors, L., & Spinka, M. (2008). Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation: Effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after separation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 110(1–2), 144–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, P., Battaglia, D., Bullon, C., & Carita, A. (2014). Review of animal welfare legislation in the beef, pork, and poultry industries. Rome, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4002e.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2018.

  • Swissveg. (2017). Veggie survey 2017. Winterthur, Switzerland. https://www.swissveg.ch/veggie_survey?language=en. Accessed 8 November 2017.

  • Terlouw, E. M., Arnould, C., Auperin, B., Berri, C., Le Bihan-Duval, E., Deiss, V., et al. (2008). Pre-slaughter conditions, animal stress and welfare: Current status and possible future research. Animal, 2(10), 1501–1517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Vegan Society 17-5-2016. There are three and half times as many vegans as there were in 2006, making it the fastest growing lifestyle movement. Birmingham. https://www.vegansociety.com/whats-new/news/find-out-how-many-vegans-are-great-britain. Accessed 8 November 2017.

  • The Vegetarian Resource Group. (2016). How many adults in the US are vegetarian or vegan? Baltimore, USA. http://www.vrg.org/nutshell/Polls/2016_adults_veg.htm. Accessed 8 November 2017.

  • Tölle, K. (2014). Milchratgeber. Berlin, Welttierschutzgesellschaft. http://www.kuhplusdu.de/wp-content/uploads/Milchratgeber_Welttierschutzgesellschaft-eV.pdf. Accessed 20 December 2017.

  • Trisel, A. (2015). Does death give meaning to life? Journal of Philosophy of Life, 5(2), 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. (2015). Early separation of cow and calf has long-term effects on social behavior. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150428081801.htm. Accessed 27 March 2017.

  • Vaarst, M., Alban, L., Mogensen, L., Milan, S., Thamsborg, S. M., & Kristensen, E. S. (2001). Health and welfare in danish dairy cattle in the transition to organic production: Problems, priorities and perspectives. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 14(4), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarst, M., & Bennedsgaard, T. W. (2002). Reduced medication in organic farming with emphasis on organic dairy production. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 43(1), S51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaarst, M., Roepstorff, A., Feenestra, A., Høgedal, P., Larsen, V. A., Lauritsen, H. B., & Hermansen, J. E. (2000). Animal health and welfare aspects in organic pig production. In J. E. Hermansen, V. Lund, & E. Thuen (Eds.), Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries (pp. 177–178). Proceedings, NJF-seminar 303.

  • Wadsworth, M. (26-8-2013). The productive lifetime of the dairy cow. The Cow Longevity Conference 2013. http://www.milkproduction.com/Library/Editorial-articles/The-productive-lifetime-of-the-cow/. Accessed 5 June 2017.

  • Waldmann, A., Koschizke, J. W., Leitzmann, C., & Hahn, A. (2004). Dietary iron intake and iron status of German female vegans: Results of the German vegan study. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 48(2), 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warriss, P. D. (1998). The welfare of slaughter pigs during transport. Animal Welfare, 7(4), 365–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, B., & Huber-Eicher, B. (1998). The effect of foraging material and perch height on feather pecking and feather damage in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 58(1), 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C., Reiners, K., & Wicke, M. (2007). Short as well as long transport duration can affect the welfare of slaughter pigs. Animal Welfare, 16(3), 385–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yacobi, B. G. (2014). What little remains of life. Journal of Philosophy of Life, 4(1), 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepp, M., Louton, H., Erhard, M., Schmidt, P., Helmer, F., & Schwarzer, A. (2018). The influence of stocking density and enrichment on the occurrence of feather pecking and aggressive pecking behavior in laying hen chicks. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 24, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Kolbe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolbe, K. Why Milk Consumption is the Bigger Problem: Ethical Implications and Deaths per Calorie Created of Milk Compared to Meat Production. J Agric Environ Ethics 31, 467–481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9740-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9740-9

Keywords

Navigation