Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cheating on Exams in the Iranian EFL Context

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed at investigating the status of cheating on exams in the Iranian EFL context. One hundred thirty two university students were surveyed to this end. They were selected through convenient sampling. The results indicated that cheating is quite common among the Iranian language students. The most important reasons for this behavior were found to be “not being ready for the exam”, “difficulty of the exam”, “lack of time to study” and “careless and lenient instructors”. The study also indicated that the most common methods of cheating are “talking to the adjacent individuals”, “copying from others' test papers”, and “using gestures to get the answers from others”. It was also found that the student’s field of study, academic level, and occupational status had a significant effect on cheating whereas gender and marital status had no effect in this regard. Furthermore, it became clear that field of study and occupational status had a significant effect on students’ attitude toward cheating whereas gender, academic level and marital status had no effect. Finally, the study indicated that age significantly correlated with cheating and attitude toward cheating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Qaisy, L. M. (2008). Students’ attitudes toward cheat and relation to demographic factors. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alschuler, A. S., & Blimling, G. S. (1995). Curbing epidemic cheating through systematic change. College Teaching, 43(4), 123–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antion, D. L., & Michael, W. B. (1983). Short-term predictive validity of demographic, affective, personal, and cognitive variables in relation to two criterion measures of cheating behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arlow, P., & Ulrich, T. A. (1985). Business ethics and business school graduates: A longitudinal study. Akron Business and Economics Review, 16(1), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird, J. S. (1980). Current trends in college cheating. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 515–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barger, R. N, Kubitschek, W. N. and Barger, J. C. (1998). Do philosophical tendencies correlate with personality types? Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 13–17.

  • Becker, D. A., and Ulstad, I. (2007). Gender differences in student ethics: Are females really more ethical? Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 77–91.

  • Beltramini, R. F., Peterson, R. A., & Kozmetsky, G. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(1), 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, U. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. S., & Emmett, D. (2001). Explaining variations in the level of academic dishonesty in studies of college students: Some new evidence. College Student Journal, 35(4), 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M. R., Wiese, D. S., & Harvey, M. G. (1998). An investigation into the dimensions of unethical behavior. The Journal of Education for Business, 73(5), 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, S. R., Davis, S. F., Hoshino, J., & Miller, R. L. (1998). Academic dishonesty: A delineation of cross-cultural patterns. College Student Journal, 32, 590–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, R. L., & Cochran, J. T. (1990). The relationship of alienation to cheating among a sample of American adolescents. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23(2), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (2004). Why more Americans are doing wrong: The cheating culture. Orlando: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (2000). The effect of anomie on academic dishonesty among university students. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christine, Z. J., & James, C. A. (2008). Personality traits and academic attributes as determinants of academic dishonesty in accounting and non-accounting college majors. Proceeding of the 15th Annual Meeting of American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences (ASBBS), 15(1), 604–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, M. J. (2001). Academic dishonesty: To be or not to be? Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 12(2), 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, T., Lim, C. L., and Wanorie, T. (2007). Factors that influence faculty actions: A study on faculty responses to academic dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholar ship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–21. Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/2007_v1n1.htm

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

  • Cole, S., & McCabe, D. L. (1996). Issues in academic integrity. New Directions in Student Services, 73, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collison, M. N.-K. (1990). Survey at Rutgers suggests that cheating may be on the rise at large universities. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 37(8), A31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, K., & Newman, L. (1997). Ethics in early childhood field experiences. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K. J., & Rotter, J. B. (1989). Morality-conscience guilt scale as a predictor of ethical behavior in a cheating situation among college females. The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, D. F., & Spiller, M. S. (1998). Learning from the literature on collegiate cheating: A review of empirical research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(6), 683–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielsen, R. D., Simon, A. F., & Pavlick, R. (2006). The culture of cheating: From the classroom to the exam room. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 17(1), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F. (1993). Cheating in college is for a career: Academic dishonesty in the 1990’s. Atlanta, Georgia: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: Prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DePalmer, M. T., Madey, S. F., & Bornschein, S. (1995). Individual differences and cheating behavior: Guilt and cheating in competitive situations. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Clark, R. E., Williams, L. E., Francis, B., & Haines, V. J. (1996). College cheating: Ten years later. Research in Higher Education, 37, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., Shinohara, K., & Yasukawa, H. (1999). College cheating in Japan and the United States. Research in Higher Education, 40(3), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkender, P. J., Range, L. M., Hamilton, M., Strehlow, M., Jackson, S., Blanchard, E., & Dean, P. (1994). The case of the stolen psychology test: An analysis of an actual cheating incident. Ethics and Behavior, 4, 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. T. (1970). Levels of cheating under conditions of informative appeal to honesty, public affirmation of value, and threats of punishment. The Journal of Educational Research, 64, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36, 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: An examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 16(2), 777–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E., & Clark, R. E. (1986). College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude. Research in Higher Education, 25, 342–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. The Journal of Education for Business, 64(5), 234–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, J. P. (1976). The assessment and prevention of answer copying on undergraduate multiple-choice exams. Research in Higher Education, 5(4), 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1992). Students’ reactions to student cheating. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 260–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: the role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: Opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics and Behavior, 8, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibler, W. L., & Kibler, P. V. (1993). When students resort to cheating. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(45), B1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H. A., Levenburg, N. M., McKendall, M., & Mothersell, W. (2007). Cheating during the college years: How do business school students compare? Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197–206. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9165-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krsak AM (2007). Curbing academic dishonesty in online courses. TCC 2007 Proceedings, 159–170.

  • Lathrop, A., & Foss, K. (2000). Student cheating and plagiarism in the internet era: A wake-up call. Englewood, Colo: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. L., & Coalter, T. (2006). Academic integrity: An instructor’s obligation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 155–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, V. K. G., & See, S. K. B. (2001). Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, F. L. (2006). The ethical attitudes of accounting students. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, K. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1993). Academic dishonesty: The honor system and students’ attitudes. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, A. C., Ingram, R., & Dato-On, M. C. (2006). The business of ethics and gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (1999). National efforts to stem cheating epidemic begins this month. Brown University Child and Adolescent Letter, 15(9), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2001). Cheating: Why students do it and how we can help them stop. American Educator, 25(4), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty and educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91(3/4), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: Honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64, 522–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Cheating among business students: A challenge for business leaders and educators. Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college: Longitudinal trends and recent developments. Change, 28, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38(3), 379–396. EJ547 655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Treviño, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 211–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35(1), 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, R. D., & Ross, S. M. (1989). Student cheating in high school: A case of moral reasoning vs. “fuzzy logic.”. The High School Journal, 73(3), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, J. W., & Miethe, T. D. (1989). Applying theories of deviance to academic cheating. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazir, M. S. and Aslam, M. S. (2009). On the relationship of demography and academic dishonest behaviors of students. Paper presented at the 2nd COMSATS International Business Research Conference, Lahore, Pakistan.

  • Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuss, E. M. (1984). Academic integrity: Comparing faculty and student attitudes. Improving College and University Teaching, 32(3), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakovski, C. C., & Elliott, S. L. (2007). Academic dishonesty: Perception of business students. College Student Journal, 41(2), 466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. (1998). He says it’s okay. American Demographics, 20(6), 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M., & Ballew, C. (1994). Attitudes toward cheating of self and others by college students and professors. Psychological Record, 44, 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R., and Sweeney, A. (2002, October 2). Teachers face firing in cheating scandal. Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved May 28, 2011, from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1460786.html

  • Sims, R. L. (1995). The severity of academic dishonesty: A comparison of faculty and student views. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 233–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A. (1982). Factors in students’ dishonesty. Psychological Reports, 51(3), 775–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. J., Davy, J. A., Rosenberg, D. L., & Haight, G. T. (2002). A structural modeling investigation of the influence of demographic and attitudinal factors and in-class deterrents on cheating behaviors among accounting majors. Journal of Accounting Education, 20(1), 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M. L., & Davis, J. R. (2004). Perception of dishonesty among two-years college students: Academic versus business situation. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. B., & Havlicek, L. (1986). Academic misconduct: Results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys. Journal of Allied Health, 15(2), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E., & Stevens, F. W. (1987). Ethical inclinations of tomorrow’s managers revisited: How and why students cheat. The Journal of Education for Business, 63, 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., & Zuo, J. (1997). Profile of college examination cheaters. College Student Journal, 31, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant, P., & Duggan, F. (2008). The recorded incidence of student plagiarism and the penalties applied. London: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G. (1997). Gender differences in students’ rational decisions to cheat. Deviant Behavior, 18(4), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tom, G., & Borin, N. (1988). Cheating in academe. The Journal of Education for Business, 1, 153–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandehey, M., Diekhoff, G., & LaBeff, E. (2007). College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code. Journal of College Student Development, 48(4), 468–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitro, F. T., & Schoer, L. A. (1972). The effects of probability of test success, test importance, and risk of detection on the incidence of cheating. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wajda-Johnston, V. A., Handal, P. J., Brawer, P. A., & Fabricatore, A. N. (2001). Academic dishonesty at the graduate level. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, D. A., & Beck, W. L. (1990). Gender and dishonesty. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Factors associated with cheating among college students: A review. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Gender differences in cheating attitudes and classroom cheating behavior: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 41, 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. C., & Kelly, R. (1974). Cheating: Student/faculty views and responsibilities. Improving College and University Teaching, 22, 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zastrow, C. H. (1970). Cheating among college graduate students. The Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 157–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelna, C. L., & Bresciani, M. J. (2004). Assessing and addressing academic integrity at a doctoral extensive institution. NASPA Journal Online, 42(1), 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Foreign Languages and Linguistics, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shiraz University, 7194684795, Shiraz, Iran

    Alireza Ahmadi

Authors
  1. Alireza Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Ahmadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmadi, A. Cheating on Exams in the Iranian EFL Context. J Acad Ethics 10, 151–170 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9156-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9156-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation