Abstract
Evidence continues to maintain that the use of antecedent variables (i.e., instructional practices, and environmental characteristics) increase prosocial and adaptive behaviors of students with disabilities (e.g., Kern et al. in J Appl Behav Anal 27(1):7–19, 1994; Stichter et al. in Behav Disord 30:401–418, 2005). This study extends the literature by systematically utilizing practitioner-implemented structural analyzes within school settings to determine antecedent variables affecting the prosocial behavior of students with autism. Optimal antecedents were combined into intervention packages and assessed utilizing a multiple baseline design across settings. All three students demonstrated improvement across all three settings. Rates of engagement and social interaction were obtained from classroom peers to serve as benchmark data. Findings indicate that practitioners can implement structural analyzes and design corresponding interventions for students with ASD within educational settings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—revised (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Axelrod, S. (1987). Functional and structural analysis of behavior: Approaches leading to reduced use of punishment procedures. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 165–178. doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90001-1.
Braithwaite, K. L., & Richdale, A. L. (2000). Functional communication training to replace challenging behaviors across two behavioral outcomes. Behavioral Interventions, 15(1), 21–36. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-078X(200001/03)15:1<21::AID-BIN45>3.0.CO;2-#.
Carr, E. G. (1994). Emerging themes in the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 393–399. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-393.
Carr, E. G., Yarbrough, S. C., & Langdon, N. A. (1997). Effects of idiosyncratic stimulus variables on functional analysis outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 673–686. doi:10.1901/jaba.1997.30-673.
Conroy, M., Fox, J., Crain, L., Jenkins, A., & Belcher, K. (1996). Evaluating the social and ecological validity of analog assessment procedures for challenging behaviors in young children. Education & Treatment of Children, 19, 232–256.
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Hagan-Burke, S., Burke, M. D., & Sugai, G. (2007). Using structural analysis and academic-based interventions for a student at-risk of EBD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 174–190.
Hastings, R. P., & Brown, T. (2002). Coping strategies and the impact of challenging behaviors on special educators’ burnout. Mental Retardation, 40(2), 148–156. doi:10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0148:CSATIO>2.0.CO;2.
Iovannone, R., Dunlap, G., Huber, H., & Kincaid, D. (2003). Effective educational practices for students with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 150–165. doi:10.1177/10883576030180030301.
Kantor, J. R. (1959). Interbehavioral psychology. Granville, OH: Principia Press.
Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical and applied significance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–452. doi:10.1177/014544557714001.
Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kern, L., Childs, K. E., Dunlap, G., Clarke, S., & Falk, G. D. (1994). Using assessment-based curricular intervention to improve the classroom behavior of a student with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(1), 7–19. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-7.
Kern, L., & Clemens, N. H. (2007). Antecedent strategies to promote appropriate classroom behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 65–75. doi:10.1002/pits.20206.
Machalicek, W., O’Reilly, M. F., Beretevas, N., Sigafoos, J., & Lancioni, G. E. (2007). A review of intervention to reduce challenging behavior in school settings for students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(3), 229–246. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2006.10.005.
Massey, N., & Wheeler, J. (2000). Acquisition and generalization of activity schedules and their effects on tasks engagement in a young child with autism in an inclusive preschool classroom. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35(3), 326–333.
National Research Council (2001). Educating children with autism. Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism. C. Lord and J.P. McGee (Eds.), Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., Edrisinha, C., & Andrews, A. (2005). An examination of the effects of a classroom activity schedule on levels of self- injury and engagement for a child with severe autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(3), 305–311. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-3294-1.
Peck, J., Sasso, G. M., & Jolivette, K. (1997). Use of the structural analysis hypothesis testing model to improve social interactions via peer-mediated intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12(4), 219–230. doi:10.1177/108835769701200404.
Reichow, B., Volkmar, F. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (2008). Development of the evaluative method of evaluating and determining evidenced-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1311–1319. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0517-7.
Schwartz, L., & Baer, D. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice state of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 242(2), 189–204. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-189.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Smith, T., Scahill, L., Dawson, G., Guthrie, D., Lord, C., Odom, S., et al. (2007). Designing research studies on psychosocial interventions in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 354–366. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0173-3.
Stichter, J. P., & Conroy, M. (2005). Structural analysis in natural settings: A responsive functional assessment strategy. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14(1), 19–34. doi:10.1007/s10864-005-0959-y.
Stichter, J. P., Hudson, S., & Sasso, G. M. (2005). The use of structural analysis to identify setting events in applied settings for students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 401–418.
Stichter, J. P., Lewis, T. J., Johnson, N., & Trussell, R. (2004). Toward a structural assessment: Analyzing the merits of an assessment tool for a student with E/BD. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(1), 25–40. doi:10.1177/073724770403000103.
Sutherland, K. S., & Wehby, J. H. (2001). Exploring the relationship between increased opportunities to respond to academic requests and academic and behavioral outcomes of students with EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 113–121. doi:10.1177/074193250102200205.
Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 27(1), 25–31.
Umbreit, J., & Blair, K. (1997). Using structural analysis to facilitate treatment of aggression and noncompliance in a young child at risk for behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 75–86.
Wheeler, J. J., Carter, S. L., Mayton, M. R., & Thomas, R. A. (2002). Structural analysis of instructional variables and their effects on task-engagement and self-aggression. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(4), 391–398.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stichter, J.P., Randolph, J.K., Kay, D. et al. The Use of Structural Analysis to Develop Antecedent-based Interventions for Students with Autism. J Autism Dev Disord 39, 883–896 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0693-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0693-8