Skip to main content
Log in

Novel potentiometric sensors for the selective determination of domperidone

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fabrication and electrochemical response characteristics of two novel potentiometric sensors for the selective determination of domperidone (DOM) are described. The two fabricated sensors incorporate DOM–PTA (phosphotungstic acid) ion pair as the electroactive material. The sensors include a PVC membrane sensor and a carbon paste sensor. The sensors showed a linear, stable, and near Nernstian slope of 56.5 and 57.8 mV/decade for PVC membrane and carbon paste sensors, respectively over a relatively wide range of DOM concentration (1.0 × 10−1–1.0 × 10−5 and 1.0 × 10−1–3.55 × 10−6 M). The response time of DOM–PTA membrane sensor was less than 25 s and that in the case of carbon paste sensor was less than 20 s. A useful pH range of 4–6 was obtained for both types of sensors. A detection limit of 7.36 × 10−5 M was obtained for PVC membrane sensor and 1.0 × 10−6 M was obtained for carbon paste sensor. The proposed sensors showed very good selectivity to DOM in the presence of a large number of other interfering ions. The analytical application of the developed sensors in the determination of the drug in pharmaceutical formulations such as tablets was investigated. The results obtained are in good agreement with the values obtained by the standard method. The sensors were also applied for the determination of DOM in real samples such as urine by the standard addition method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amin AS, Gamal HR (2003) Anal Sci 19:747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meuldermans W, Reyntjens H, Scheygrond H, Hendricks R, Michiels M, Heykants J (1981) Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 6:61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Khamis KI, Hagga ME, Al-Khamees HA (1990) Anal Lett 23:451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rao G, Kini GR, Avadhanulu AB, Vatsa DK (1990) East Pharm 33:133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rama Mohan Y, Avadhanulu AB (1998) Indian Drugs 35:754

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zavitsanos AP, MacDonald C, Bassoo E, Gopaul D (1999) J Chromatogr B: Biomed Appl 730:9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanumula GV, Raman B (2000) Indian Drugs 37:375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zarapkar SS, Bhandari NP, Halker UP (2000) Indian Drugs 37:295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Argekar AP, Powar SG (1999) J Planar Chromatogr Mod TLC 12:272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobylinska M, Kobylinska K (2000) J Chromatogr B: Biomed Appl 744:207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto K, Hagino M, Kotaki S, Iga T (1998) J Chromatogr B: Biomed Appl 720:251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wahdan T, El-Ghany NA (2005) Farmaco 60:830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. British Pharmacopoeia (1998) 1:506

  14. Suzuki H, Akimoto K, Nakagawa H, Sugimoto I (1989) J Pharm Sci 1:62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Suzuki H, Akimoto K, Nakagawa H (1991) Chem Pharm Bull 1:133

    Google Scholar 

  16. Erdem A, Ozkan D, Kerman K, Meric B, Dalbasti T, Ozsoz M (2000) Turk J Chem 24:353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Girish Kumar K, Letha R (1997) J Pharm Biomed Anal 15:1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Girish Kumar K, John S, Poduval R, Augustine P (2005) The Chin Pharm J 57:29

    Google Scholar 

  19. Girish Kumar K, Augustine P, Poduval R, John S (2006) Pharmazie 61:353

    Google Scholar 

  20. Girish Kumar K, John S, Augustine P, Poduval R, Beena S (2007) Anal Sci 23:291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Girish Kumar K, Augustine P, John S (2007) Port Electrochim Acta 25:375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Girish Kumar K, Augustine P, John S, Radecki J, Radecka H (2008) Anal Lett 41:1144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Girish Kumar K, Poduval R, John S, Augustine P (2007) Microchim Acta 156:283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chiba K, Horii H, Chiba T, Kato Y, Hirano T, Ishizaki T (1995) J Chromatogr B 668:77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zyka J (1994) Instrumentation in analytical chemistry. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diamond D (1998) Principles of chemical and biological sensors. In: Chemical Analysis, vol 150. Wiley, pp 2–19

  27. Umezawa Y, Umezawa K, Sato H (1995) Pure Appl Chem 67:507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Birch BJ, Edmonds TE (1998) Chemical sensors. Blackie, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Oesch U, Anker P, Ammann D, Simon W (1981) Ion selective electrodes. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas JDR (1986) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 14:1135

    Google Scholar 

  31. European Pharmacopoeia (2002) 4th edn. France 1631

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Directorate of Extramural Research and Intellectual Property Rights, Defence Research and Development Organisation, Govt. of India, for financial support to undertake this study as part of a research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Girish Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Girish Kumar, K., Augustine, P. & John, S. Novel potentiometric sensors for the selective determination of domperidone. J Appl Electrochem 40, 65–71 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9975-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9975-2

Keywords

Navigation