Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The 100 most cited articles on trachoma: a bibliometric analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Trachoma is the cause of blindness or visual impairment in 1.9 million people. Few bibliometric studies have been carried out, but none explore the characteristics of the 100 most cited articles on trachoma.

Methods

A keyword-based search without time restriction was performed in September 2022 using the Scopus database. Search keywords include the following: “trachoma; trachome; tracoma; trachomatis.” Two authors independently screened the literature and extracted data. The search result was obtained to classify the 100 articles according to their number of citations.

Results

The Top 100 articles were published between 1957 and 2015 with a total of 11,102 citations (range 56–689). The country with the most significant contribution was the USA (n = 56). The Lancet was the most active journal (n = 15). Bailey RL was the author with the highest number of publications (n = 30). The Edna McConnell Clark Foundation (n = 26) was the most prominent funding entity. The type of original article was the most published (n = 83), in addition, the most frequent thematic area was prevention (n = 33). The most popular keywords were trachoma (n = 93), chlamydia trachomatis (n = 55), and azithromycin (n = 34).

Conclusions

The study provides new insight into trachoma research, information that may help healthcare providers, researchers, and stakeholders better understand trends and influential contributions. It highlights under-researched areas that could be the basis for future research

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lansingh VC (2016) Trachoma. BMJ. Clin Evid 2016:0706

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emerson PM, Bailey RL, Walraven GE, Lindsay SW (2001) Human and other faeces as breeding media of the trachoma vector Musca sorbens. Med Vet Entomol 15(3):314–320. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00318.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith JL, Flueckiger RM, Hooper PJ, Polack S, Cromwell EA, Palmer SL et al (2013) The geographical distribution and burden of trachoma in Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7(8):e2359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0002359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Frick KD, Hanson CL, Jacobson GA (2003) Global burden of trachoma and economics of the disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 69(5 Suppl):1–10. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2003.69.5_suppl_1.0690001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Habtamu E, Wondie T, Aweke S, Tadesse Z, Zerihun M, Zewdie Z et al (2015) Trachoma and relative poverty: a case-control study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9(11):e0004228. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004228

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chellappandi P, Vijayakumar CS (2018) Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics-an emerging field in library and information science research. Shanlax Int J Educ 7(1):5–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tian H, Chen J (2022) A bibliometric analysis on global eHealth. Digit Health 8:20552076221091350

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021) How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res 133:285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R et al (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18(2):296–309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C (2020) The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 14(1):155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xie M, Wu Q, Wang Y, Ge S, Fan X (2020) Publication trends of research on uveal melanoma during 2000–2020: a 20-year bibliometric study. Ann Transl Med 21:1463. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-3700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ay IE, Tazegul G, Duranoğlu Y (2022) A comparison of scientometric data and publication policies of ophthalmology journals. Indian J Ophthalmol 70(5):1801–1807. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2720_21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. About Scopus - Abstract and citation database | Elsevier [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 11]. Available from: https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus

  14. Tang FF, Chang HL, Huang YT, Wang KC (1932) Studies on the etiology of trachoma with special reference to isolation of the virus in chick embryo. Chin Med J Peking China 75(6):429–447

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin DL, Bid R, Sandi F, Goodhew EB, Massae PA, Lasway A et al (2015) Serology for trachoma surveillance after cessation of mass drug administration. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9(2):e0003555. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon AW, Pavluck AL, Courtright P, Aboe A, Adamu L, Alemayehu W et al (2015) The global trachoma mapping project: methodology of a 34-country population-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 22(3):214–225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lavett DK, Lansingh VC, Carter MJ, Eckert KA, Silva JC (2013) Will the SAFE strategy be sufficient to eliminate trachoma by 2020? Puzzlements and possible solutions. Sci World J 2013:648106. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/648106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon AW, Pavluck A, Courtright P et al (2015) The global trachoma mapping project: methodology of a 34-country population-based study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 22:214–225

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Erfanmanesh M, Tahira M, Abrizah A (2017) The publication success of 102 nations in scopus and the performance of their scopus-indexed journals. Pub Res Q. 33(4):421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9540-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Etienne C, Abbasi K, Cuervo LG (2018) Research for health in the Americas. BMJ 362:k2944. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2944

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Chien JL, Sabharwal J, Namoglu EC, Ghassibi MP, Yuan M, Gandy C et al (2022) The 100 most mentioned glaucoma articles online with highest altmetric attention scores. J Glaucoma 31(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2015.1037401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang XJ, Chen D, Jiang Y, Chou YY, Luo Y, Li Y et al (2022) The 100 most influential articles in myopia: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 15(1):150–156. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2022.01.22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh BMQR, Banu R, Nusinovici S, Sabanayagam C (2021) 100 most-cited articles on diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 105(10):1329–1336. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Grzybowski A, Shtayer C, Schwartz SG, Moisseiev E (2021) The 100 most-cited papers on age-related macular degeneration: a bibliographic perspective. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 6(1):e000823. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000823

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grzybowski A, Shtayer C, Schwartz SG, Moisseiev E (2022) The 100 most cited papers on retinal detachment: a bibliographic perspective. Br J Ophthalmol 106(3):305–311. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Allon G, Moisseiev E, Dichter S, Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Mezer E (2022) The 100 most cited papers on amblyopia: a bibliographic perspective. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02487-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nov E, Moisseiev E (2020) The top 100 most-cited papers on intravitreal injections: a bibliographic perspective. Clin Ophthalmol Auckl NZ 14:2757–2772. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S267617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krauthammer M, Moisseiev E (2020) The 100 most cited articles on vitrectomy: a bibliographic perspective. Ophthalmol Retina 4(4):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2019.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Staddon J (2020). Why Do American Universities Lead the World in Scientific Research?. The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal. Available in: https://www.jamesgmartin.center/2020/06/why-do-american-universities-lead-the-world-in-scientific-research/

  30. Journal Impact Metrics [Internet] 2022 [cited 27 Oct 2022]. Available in: https://www.thelancet.com/journal-impact-metrics

  31. The Lancet Global Health Hub [Internet] 2022 [cited 27 Oct 2022]. Available in: https://www.thelancet.com/global-health

  32. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. Journal information [Internet] 2021 [cited 27 oct 2022]. Available in: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/journal-information

  33. Why LSHTM? [Internet] 2022 [cited 27 Oct 2022]. Available in: https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/why-lshtm

  34. Our History [Internet]. 2022 [cited 27 Oct 2022]. Available in: https://www.emcf.org/about-us/our-history/

  35. Esrey SA, Potash JB, Roberts L, Shiff C (1991) Effects of improved water supply and sanitation on ascariasis, diarrhoea, dracunculiasis, hookworm infection, schistosomiasis, and trachoma. Bull World Health Organ 69(5):609–621

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Thylefors B, Dawson CR, Jones BR, West SK, Taylor HR (1987) A simple system for the assessment of trachoma and its complications. Bull World Health Organ 65(4):477–483

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schachter J, West SK, Mabey D, Dawson CR, Bobo L, Bailey R et al (1999) Azithromycin in control of trachoma. The Lancet 354(9179):630–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12387-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no specific financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by CRAC and SGCB. The first draft of the manuscript was written by CRAC and SGCB, and the manuscript was revised by CRAC. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Renzo Aquino-Canchari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aquino-Canchari, C.R., Chavez-Bustamante, S.G. The 100 most cited articles on trachoma: a bibliometric analysis. Int Ophthalmol 43, 4235–4246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02834-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02834-8

Keywords

Navigation