Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Which procedure has more effect on macular thickness: primary posterior continuous capsulorhexis (PPCC) combined with phacoemulsification or Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare the effect of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and primary posterior continuous capsulorhexis (PPCC) combined with phacoemulsification on macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in adults. This prospective comparative interventional study included 32 eyes of 30 patients who underwent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and 33 eyes of 33 patients who underwent cataract surgery with PPCC. Detailed ocular examinations, including macular thickness measurements by OCT, were performed in all patients preoperatively and postoperatively on the 1st day, 1st week, and 1st, 3rd and 6th months. No significant differences were found in macular thickness between the two groups in preoperative and postoperative follow-up. No cystoid changes were observed in OCT during the postoperative period in both groups. Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy and PPCC combined with cataract surgery are safe and effective procedures that are not associated with an increase in macular thickness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sundelin K, Shams H, Stenevi U (2005) Three-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification with two different silicone intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:11–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Georgopoulos M, Menapace R, Findl O, Rainer G, Petternel V, Kiss B (2001) Posterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis with hydrogel and silicone intraocular lens implantation: development of capsulorhexis size and capsule opacification. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:825–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinert RF, Puliafito CA, Kumar SR, Dudak SD, Patel S (1991) Cystoid macular edema, retinal detachment, and glaucoma after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 112:373–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burq MA, Taqui AM (2008) Frequency of retinal detachment and other complications after neodymium:Yag laser capsulotomy. J Pak Med Assoc 58:550–552

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Galand A, van Cauwenberge F, Moosavi J (1996) Posterior capsulorhexis in adult eyes with intact and clear capsules. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:458–461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Cauwenberge F, Rakic JM, Galand A (1997) Complicated posterior capsulorhexis: aetiology, management, and outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 81:195–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson ML, Martidis A (2003) Managing cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:39–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson BA, Kim JY, Ament CS, Ferrufino-Ponce ZK, Grabowska A, Cremers SL (2007) Clinical pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Risk factors for development and duration after treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:1550–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ray S, D’Amico DJ (2002) Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Semin Ophthalmol 17:167–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yeh PC, Ramanathan S (2002) Latanoprost and clinically significant cystoid macular edema after uneventful phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:1814–1818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altintaş O, Yüksel N, Karabaş VL, Demirci G (2005) Cystoid macular edema associated with latanoprost after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 15:158–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Falcone PM (1996) Vitreomacular traction syndrome confused with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 27:392–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. De Groot V, Hubert M, Van Best JA, Engelen S, Van Aelst S, Tassignon MJ (2003) Lack of fluorophotometric evidence of aqueous–vitreous barrier disruption after posterior capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2330–2338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith RT, Moscoso WE, Trokel S, Auran J (1995) The barrier function in neodymium-YAG laser capsulotomy. Arch Ophthalmol 113:645–652

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozaki L (1984) The barrier function of the posterior capsule. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc 10:182–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schalnus RW, Ohrloff C, Magone T (1995) The aqueous humor-vitreous body barrier and the blood–aqueous humor barrier after YAG laser capsulotomy in capsular sac vs ciliary sulcus fixation of the intraocular lens. Ophthalmologe 92:289–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee MS, Lass JH (2004) Rapid response of cystoid macular edema related to Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy to 0.5% ketorolac. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 35:162–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Georgalas I, Petrou P, Kalantzis G, Papaconstantinou D, Koutsandrea C, Ladas I (2009) Nd:YAG capsulotomy for posterior capsule opacification after combined clear corneal phacoemulsification and vitrectomy. Ther Clin Risk Manag 5:133–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bukelman A, Abrahami S, Oliver M, Pollack A (1992) Cystoid macular oedema following neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy a prospective study. Eye (Lond) 6:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Albert DW, Wade EC, Parrish RK et al (1990) A prospective study of angiographic cystoid macular edema one year after Nd:YAG posterior capsulotomy. Ann Ophthalmol 22:139–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ursell PG, Spalton DJ, Whitcup SM, Nussenblatt RB (1999) Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification: relationship to blood–aqueous barrier damage and visual acuity. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1492–1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stifter E, Menapace R, Neumayer T, Luksch A (2008) Macular morphology after cataract surgery with primary posterior capsulorhexis and posterior optic buttonholing. Am J Ophthalmol 146:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yazici AT, Bozkurt E, Altan C et al (2010) Macular thickness changes after phacoemulsification combined with primary posterior curvilinear capsulorhexis. Eur J Ophthalmol 20:376–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Necip Kara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kara, N., Yazici, A.T., Bozkurt, E. et al. Which procedure has more effect on macular thickness: primary posterior continuous capsulorhexis (PPCC) combined with phacoemulsification or Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy?. Int Ophthalmol 31, 303–307 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-011-9461-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-011-9461-9

Keywords

Navigation