Skip to main content
Log in

Nāgārjuna and the Philosophy of Language

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine some of the key points of Nāgārjuna’s discussion of problems relating to the philosophy of language. We will focus on two works from Nāgārjuna’s yukti-corpus that address these matters most explicitly, the Vigrahavyāvartanī (VV) and the Vaidalyaprakaraṇa (VP). The discussion will concentrate on four topics: Nāgārjuna’s views on semantics, the problem of empty names, the relation between language and momentariness, and the implications of Madhyamaka views on parts and wholes for the existence of language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gokhale, V. (1930). Akṣara-Çatakam. The Hundred Letters, A Madhyamaka Text by Āryadeva, After Chinese and Tibetan Materials. Heidelberg: Harrassowitz.

  • Jha, G. (1986). The Tattvasasaṃgraha of Shāntarakṣita: With the Commentary of Kamalashīla. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. (2015). Madhyamakāvatāra-kārikā Chapter 6. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 4,: 1–30.

  • Pind, O. H. (2001). Why the Vaidalyaprakaraṇa cannot be an authentic work of Nāgārjuna”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd-und Ostasiens, 25, 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, S. D. (2006). The Tattvasaṅgraha of Ācārya Śāntarakṣita with the ‘Pañjikā’ Commentary of Ācārya Kamalaśīla. Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śāstrī, S. D. (1998). Mahāmuni Vātsyāyan’s Nyāya-Bhāṣya on Gautama-Nyāya-Sutras with Prasannapadā Commentary of Pt. Sudarśanācārya, Śāstrī. Varanasi: Bauddha Bharati.

  • VP: Nāgārjuna’s Vaidalyaprakaraṇa. See Tola and Dragonetti 1985.

  • VV: Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī. See Yonezawa 2008.

  • Siderits, M. (2007). Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction. Hackett, Indianapolis, IN: Ashgate, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tola, F., & Dragonetti, C. (1981). Nāgārjuna’s conception of ‘voidness’ (śūnyatā). Journal of Indian Philosophy, 9, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tola, F., & Dragonetti, C. (1982). Dignāga’s Ālambanaparīkṣāvṛtti. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 10, 105–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tola, F., & Dragonetti, C. (1985). Nāgarjuna’s Refutation of Logic (Nyāya): Vaidalyaprakaraṇa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff, J. (2010). The Dispeller of Disputes: Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, Y. (2008). Vigrahavyāvartanī: Sanskrit transliteration and Tibetan translation. Journal of the Naritasan Institute for Buddhist Studies, 31, 209–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Westerhoff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westerhoff, J. Nāgārjuna and the Philosophy of Language. J Indian Philos 47, 779–793 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-017-9341-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-017-9341-3

Keywords

Navigation