Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multilevel Investigation of Students’ Self-regulation Processes in Learning Science: Classroom Learning Environment and Teacher Effectiveness

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of students’ classroom learning environment perceptions and teacher effectiveness in 7th grade students’ self-regulation in science classes. Students’ self-regulation was examined in terms of self-efficacy, achievement goals, and metacognitive strategy use which constitute important components of self-regulation. The relations of students’ perceived classroom learning environment (i.e. student cohesiveness, teacher support, involvement, investigation, task orientation, cooperation, and equity) and teacher effectiveness (i.e. teachers' beliefs, characteristics, and occupational well-being) to students’ self-regulation were tested by conducting separate HLM analyses considering the nested structure of the data. To select a nationally representative sample, two-stage random sampling approach was used. Data were collected from 372 science teachers and their 8198 seventh grade students in Turkey. Results indicated that perceived classroom learning environment variables were good predictors of students’ self-regulation in learning science. Among the learning environment variables, the task orientation appeared to be the most powerful predictor. Additionally, teacher variables were found to have direct relations with students’ self-regulation and moderate the relationships between learning environment and self-regulation variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, C. (1992). Clasrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arisoy, N. (2007). Examining 8th grade students’ perception of learning environment of science classrooms in relation to motivational beliefs and attitudes (Unpublished master's thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York, NY: Longman.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York, NY: Academic Press.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: H.Freeman.

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolyard, J. J., & Moyer-Packenham, P. S. (2008). A review of the literature on mathematics and science teacher quality. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(4), 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bong, M. (2001). Between- and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirtas, Z. (2010). Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Rickards, T., & Bull, E. (2006). Californian science students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environments. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 12(1), 3–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Brok, P., Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., Taconis, R., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Learning environment profiles of Turkish secondary biology classrooms. Learning Environment Research, 13, 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P. (2001). Associations between classroom environment and academic efficacy. Learning Environment Research, 4, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman, J. P., Adams, J. E., & Ferguson, J. M. (2003). A cross-national investigation of students’ perceptions of mathematics classroom environment and academic efficacy in secondary schools. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 15. Retrieved February 16, 2018, from http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/dormanj.pdf

  • Dweck, C. S. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philedelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ee, J., Moore, P. J., & Atputhasamy, L. (2003). High-achieving students: Their motivational goals, self-regulation and achievement and relationship to their teachers' goals and strategy-based instruction. High Ability Studies, 14, 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 201–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farber, B. A. (1982). Stress and burnout: Implications for teacher motivation. New York, NY: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA).

  • Farber, B. A., & Miller, J. (1981). Teacher burnout: A psycho-educational perspective. Teachers College Record, 83(2), 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2002). Learning environments research: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In S. C. Goh & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Studies in educational environments: An international perspective (pp. 1–25). Singapore: World Scientifiic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In J. F. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1191–1240). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. New York, NY: Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association.

  • Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1996). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment questionnaire. Proceedings Western Australian Institute for Educational Research Forum. Retrieved on February 16, 2018 from http://www.waier.org.au/forums/1996/fraser.html.

  • Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). Educational environments: Evaluation antecedents and consequences. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Gherasim, L. R., Butnanu, S., & Mairean, C. (2012). Classroom environment, achievement goals and maths performance: Gender differences. Educational Studies, 39(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., McDonald Connor, C., Yang, Y., Roehring, A. D., & Morrison, F. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haertel, G. D., Walberg, H. J., & Haertel, E. D. (1981). Socio-psychological environments and learning: A quantitative synthesis. British Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Y., Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., Lin, D. M.-S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77(3), 588–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, A. W., & Davis, H. A. (2005). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and its influence on the achievement of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and education: Vol. 5. Self-efficacy beliefs during adolescence (pp. 117–137). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Classroom environment and teacher interpersonal behaviour in secondary science classes in Korea. Evaluation & Research in Education, 14(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Research, 23, 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Teachers’ occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 702–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S., Liem, A. D., & Nie, Y. (2008). Task- and self-related pathways to deep learning: The mediating role of achievement goals, classroom attentiveness, and group participation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., den Brok, P., Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2003). Students’ perceptions of interpersonal aspects of the learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 6, 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynott, D. J., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1994). Teachers’ implicit theories of intelligence and their educational goals. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(4), 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1999). Teacher burnout: A research agenda. In R. Vandenburghe, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher stress: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 295-314). Cambridge: Cambridge.

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey [MONE]. (2005). Science and technology curriculum of elementary schools (6th–8th grades). Ankara: Board of Education.

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey [MONE]. (2010). PISA 2009 project national report. Retrieved on February 16, 2018 from http://pisa.meb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/PISA-2009-Ulusal-On-Rapor.pdf

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey [MONE]. (2011). TIMMS national report. Retrieved on February 16, 2018 from http://timss.meb.gov.tr/?page_id=25

  • Ololube, N. P. (2006). Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assessment. Essays in Education, 18. Retrieved on March 6, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED496539.pdf

  • Pamuk, S., Sungur, S., & Oztekin, C. (2017). A multilevel analysis of students’ science achievements in relation to their self-regulation, epistemological beliefs, learning environment perceptions, and teachers’ personal characteristics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1423–1440.

  • Pandey, S., & Elliot, W. (2010). Suppressor variables in social work research: Ways to identify in multiple regression models. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(1), 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. C., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology, 36, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J., & Smart, R. M. (1998). An empirical evaluation of teacher effectiveness: The emergence of three critical factors. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23(2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the relationships among classroom climate, self-efficacy, and achievement in undergraduate mathematics: A multi-level analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–495). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakici, N. (2004). Eight grade students’ perceptions of their science learning environment and teachers’ interpersonal behavior (Unpublished master's thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear model: Applications and data analysis method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shim, S. S., Cho, Y., & Cassady, J. (2013). Goal structures: The role of teachers’ achievement goals and theories of intelligence. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 84–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: A study of relations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1059–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sungur, S., & Gungoren, S. (2009). The role of classroom environment perceptions in self-regulated learning and science achievement. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 883–900.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tas, Y. (2008). The interplay of students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures, personal goal orientations and learning related variables (Unpublished master's thesis). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

  • Tas, Y., Sungur, S., & Oztekin, C. (2016). Development and validation of science homework scale for middle-school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 417–444.

  • Tekbıyık, A., & Akdeniz, A. R. (2008). Teachers’ views about adoption and application of primary science and technology curriculum. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, M. S., & Yılmaz-Tuzun, O. (2009). Elementary students’ metacognition and epistemological beliefs considering science achievement, gender and socioeconomic status. Elementary Education Online, 8(3), 676–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, C. P. (2005). Teaching efficacy beliefs of pre service teachers. Jurnal IPBA, 2(2), 122–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classroom. Instructional Science, 26, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xin, T., Xu, Z., & Tatsuoka, K. (2004). Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement, and cognitive skills: A rule-space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(3), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, S. (2012). Teacher support, motivation, learning, strategy use, and achievement: A multilevel mediation model. The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2010). Investigating the relationships among elementary school students’ epistemological beliefs, metacognition, and constructivist science learning environment. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 255–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is a part of the first author’s dissertation. Thanks to Turkish Ministry of Education, Education Research and Development Department for their supports to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sündüs Yerdelen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yerdelen, S., Sungur, S. Multilevel Investigation of Students’ Self-regulation Processes in Learning Science: Classroom Learning Environment and Teacher Effectiveness. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 17, 89–110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9921-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9921-z

Keywords

Navigation