Abstract
Virtual reality-based technologies have been used in dentistry for almost two decades. Dental simulators, planning software and CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) systems have significantly developed over the years and changed both dental education and clinical practice. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practice of VRBT among dental students and educators in one European dental school using a paper-based questionnaire and the KAP among students and dental practitioners from 35 countries using an online survey. Dental students, educators and practitioners have overall positive attitudes towards VRBT but very few have used VRBT in education and practice. The majority of respondents plan to use VRBT in their future clinical practice and believe that those technologies will be widely adopted by dental practices within 22 years. Learning about VRBT and using them as part of undergraduate and continued education programmes could affect dental practitioners’ willingness to implement new technologies and enhance critical assessment of new trends in dentistry.
Abbreviations
- VRBT:
-
Virtual reality-based technology
- KAP:
-
Knowledge, attitude, practice
References
Bisler, A., Bockholt, U., Kordass, B., Suchan, M., & Voss, G. (2002). The virtual articulator. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 5(2–3), 101–106.
Bootvong, K., Liu, Z., McGrath, C., Hägg, U., Wong, R. W., Bendeus, M., et al. (2010). Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: Reliability and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics, 32(5), 589–595.
Buchanan, J. A. (2001). Use of simulation technology in dental education. Journal of Dental Education, 65(11), 1225–1231.
Curnier, F. (2010). Teaching dentistry by means of virtual reality-the Geneva project. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, 13(3), 251–263.
Dută, M., Amariei, C. I., Bogdan, C. M., Popovici, D. M., Ionescu, N., & Nuca, C. (2011). An overview of virtual and augmented reality in dental education. Oral Health and Dental Management, 10(1), 42–49.
Elian, N., Jalbout, Z. N., Classi, A. J., Wexler, A., Sarment, D., & Tarnow, D. P. (2008). Precision of flapless implant placement using real-time surgical navigation: A case series. The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 23(6), 1123–1127.
Ghanai, S., Marmulla, R., Wiechnik, J., Mühling, J., & Kotrikova, B. (2010). Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 39(1), 75–82.
Hoffman, H. G., Garcia-Palacios, A., Patterson, D. R., Jensen, M., Furness, T. I. I. I., & Ammons, W. F., Jr. (2004). The effectiveness of virtual reality for dental pain control: A case study. CyberPsychology and Behavior., 4(4), 527–535.
Lee, S. J., & Gallucci, G. O. (2013). Digital versus conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 24(1), 111–115.
Luciano, C., Banerjee, P., & DeFanti, T. (2009). Haptics-based virtual reality periodontal training simulator. Virtual Reality, 2(13), 69–85.
Lund, B., Fors, U., Sejersen, R., Sallnäs, E. L., & Rosén, A. (2011). Student perception of two different simulation techniques in oral and maxillofacial surgery undergraduate training. BMC Medical Education, 11(1), 82.
Maestre-Ferrín, L., Romero-Millán, J., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2012). Virtual articulator for the analysis of dental occlusion: An update. Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 17(1), 160–163.
Miyazaki, T., Hotta, Y., Kunii, J., Kuriyama, S., & Tamaki, Y. (2009). A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dental Materials Journal, 28(1), 44–56.
Nkenke, E., Vairaktaris, E., Bauersachs, A., Eitner, S., Budach, A., Knipfer, C., et al. (2012). Acceptance of virtual dental implant planning software in an undergraduate curriculum: A pilot study. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 90.
Orentlicher, G., & Abboud, M. (2011). Guided surgery for implant therapy. Dental Clinics of North America, 55(4), 715–744.
Sablek, A. (2013). Third virtual world congress of dental students. ADEE (Association for Dental Education in Europe) Newsletter, 9(2), 6.
San Diego, J.P., Cox, M.J., Green, T.A. & Newton, T. (2010). Haptic technology enhanced learning: HapTEL, Student attitudes towards using a haptic learning tool. Resource document. Economic and Social Research Council, http://www.researchcatalogue.esrc.ac.uk/grants/RES-139-25-0387/outputs/read/d2fcbf1a-fad1-493c-85f6-a3dd4087cb06 Accessed 29 Feb 2016.
Vervoorn, J.M. & Wesselink, P.R. (2009). The perception of the level of realism of a dental training simulator (Simodont). Resource document (poster). Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam. http://www.acta.nl/en/studying-at-acta/student-services/simodont/contact-links/index.asp. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Josipa Kern for guidance in designing the questionnaire and Patricia Reynolds for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Maja Sabalic: Previously private dental practice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Questionnaire
Appendix 2: Additional Questions Listed Only in the Paper-Based Questionnaire
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabalic, M., Schoener, J.D. Virtual Reality-Based Technologies in Dental Medicine: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Among Students and Practitioners. Tech Know Learn 22, 199–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9305-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9305-4