Skip to main content
Log in

Examination of Faculty Self-efficacy Related to Online Teaching

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through this study we sought to gain understanding of the challenges professors face as they make the transition to teaching online. We measured professors’ online teaching self-efficacy using survey research methods. Results showed that online teaching self-efficacy was high among the professors surveyed with no self-efficacy scores lower than 3.69 out of 5. The perception of student learning was the independent variable with the greatest impact on self-efficacy. Other variables that had a significant relationship with self-efficacy sub-scales were semesters taught online, future interest in teaching online, gender, satisfaction with teaching online, and academic discipline. The results suggest directions for faculty development interventions such as training and support structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawane, J., & Spector, J. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30, 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational Technology, 35, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions. Can policy change fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 1(2). Summer. Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/Berge12.html

  • Chang, T. S., Lin, H. H., & Song, M. M. (2011). University faculty members’ perceptions of their teaching efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R. L., & McKnight, M. A. (2007). Exploring burnout among university online instructors: An initial investigation. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(5), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., & Magjuka, R. (2007). What do online MBA professors have to say about online teaching? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer102/liu102.htm

  • Mehdinezhad, V. (2012). Faculty members’ understanding of teaching efficacy criteria and its relation to their characteristics. International Journal of Instruction, 5, 213–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. C. (2005). The Sloan Consortium quality framework and the five pillars. Newburyport, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

  • Perreault, H., Waldman, L., & Zhao, M. A. (2002). Overcoming barriers to successful delivery of distance-learning courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77, 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presno, C. (1998). Taking the byte out of Internet anxiety: Instructional techniques that reduce computer/Internet anxiety in the classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A.W. (2011). Learning at a distance: Undergraduate enrollment in distance education courses and degree programs (NCES 2012-154). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012154.pdf

  • Robinia, K. (2008). The effect of online teaching self-efficacy on nurse faculty teaching in public, accredited nursing programs in the state of Michigan. Unpublished Dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

  • Robinia, K. A., & Anderson, M. L. (2010). Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26, 168–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and barriers to teaching online college courses: A study of experienced online faculty in thirty-six colleges. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Environments, 11(2), 73–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian S. Horvitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horvitz, B.S., Beach, A.L., Anderson, M.L. et al. Examination of Faculty Self-efficacy Related to Online Teaching. Innov High Educ 40, 305–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9316-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9316-1

Keywords

Navigation