Abstract
Energy (biomass) and energy flows (production, inputs, transfers and losses) were calculated for eight and twelve compartment systems (phytoplankton, benthic primary producers (macroalgae, microphytobenthos), zooplankton, benthos (meiofauna, suspensivores, deposivores and predators), fish, birds and particulate organic matter (POM) in sediment and suspended particulate matter (SPM)) both balanced and unbalanced of Dublin Bay and the Baie de Somme. The resultant models were analysed with the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research (SCOR) network analysis package. While the two systems share many properties such as the dominant biosedimentary facies, there are fundamental differences in both structuring and responses of the systems. The network analysis suggested that the Baie de Somme was far more productive, notably in terms of water column productivity, and was the more mature system. The high organic SPM input to Dublin Bay greatly elevated the degree of detritivory such that the analysis generated metrics indicative of a mature system but which rather reflected the degree of anthropogenic stress on the system. However, the analysis of both systems displayed varying degrees of maturity. Increasing the number of compartments greatly increased the calculated throughput (T) of the system and other associated metrics such as capacity (C), ascendancy (A) and redundancy (R). In the case of Dublin Bay, a higher number of compartments increased the various measures of system maturity, but this was much less marked for the Baie de Somme. Balancing the systems also increased T, C, A and R, and, to a lesser extent but not invariably, the system maturity metrics. The ratios of the comparative system metrics such as comparative ascendancy (A/C) were much less changed by the different methodologies and as such are recommended as robust measures for intercomparison of system performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baird, D. & R. E. Ulanowicz, 1993. Comparative study on the trophic structure, cycling and ecosystem properties of four tidal estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 221–237.
Baird, D., J. M. McGlade & R. E. Ulanowicz, 1991. The comparative ecology of six marine ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B 353: 15–29.
Bourke, D., 2001. A study of the meiofauna of Dublin bay. Unpublished BA (Mod.) Thesis, University of Dublin.
Clements, F. E., 1936. Nature and structure of the climax. Journal of Ecology 24: 252–284.
Connell, J. H., 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. High diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199: 1302–1310.
Dame, R. F., J. D. Spurrier, T. M. Williams, B. Kjerve, R. G. Zingmark, T. G. Wolaver, T. H. Chrzanowski, H. N. McKellar & F. J. Vernberg, 1991. Annual material processing by a salt marsh-estuarine basin system in South Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 72: 153–166.
Dame, R. F. & D. Stilwell, 1984. Environmental factors influencing macrodetritus flux in North Inlet estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf. Science 18: 721–726.
De Montuadin, X. & G. Bachelet, 1996. Experimental evidence of complex interactions between biotic and abiotic factors in the dynamics of an intertidal population of the bivalve Cerastoderma edule. Oceanologia Acta 19: 449–463.
Desprez, M., G. Bachelet, J. J. Beukema, J.-P. Ducrotoy, K. Essink, J. Marchand, H. Michaelis, B. Robineau & J. G. Wilson, 1991. Dynamique des populations de Macoma balthica dans les estuaires du Nord-Ouest de l'Europe. In: Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. In Ducrotoy, J.-P. & M. Elliott (eds). Olssen and Olssen, Fredensborg, Denmark, 159–165.
Desprez, M., H. Rybarczyk, J. G. Wilson, J.-P. Ducrotoy, F. Sueur, R. Olivesi & B. Elkaim, 1992. Biological impact of eutrophication in the bay of Somme and the induction and impact of anoxia. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 30: 149–159.
Dial, R. & J. Roughgarden, 1998. Theory of marine communities: the intermediate disturbance hypothesis. Ecology 79: 1412–1424.
Ducrotoy, J. -P., H. Rybarczyk, G., Bachelet, J. J. Beukema, M. Desprez, J. Dorjes, K. Essink, J. Guillou, H. Michaelis, B. Sylvand, J. G. Wilson, B. Elkaim & F. Ibanez, 1991. A comparison of the population dynamics of the cockle (Cerastoderma edule) within north-west Europe. In Elliot, M. & J.-P. Ducrotoy (eds), Estuaries and Coasts-spatial and Temporal Comparisons. Olssen & Olssen, Fredensborg, 173–184.
Essink, K., 2003. Response of an estuarine ecosystem to reduced organic waste discharge. Aquatic Ecology 37: 65–76.
Foley, N., 2002. Systems Analysis and Modelling of the Dublin Bay Ecosystem. MSc Thesis, University of Dublin.
Gray, J. S., 1981. Ecology of Marine Sediments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grime, J. P., 1997. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: the debate deepens. Science 277: 1260–1261.
Heip, C. H. R., N. K. Goosen, P. M. J. Herman, J. Kromkamp, J. J. Middleberg & K. Soetaert, 1995. Production and consumption of biological particles in temperate tidal estuaries. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 33: 1–149.
Jeffrey, D. W., B. M. Brennan, E. Jennings, B. Madden & J. G. Wilson, 1995. Nutrient sources for in-shore nuisance macroalgae: the Dublin Bay case. Ophelia 42: 147–161.
Jeffrey, D. W., B. Madden, B. Rafferty, R. Dwyer & J. G. Wilson, 1991. Indicator organisms as a guide to estuarine management. In Jeffrey, D. W. & B. M. Madden (eds), Bioindicators and Environmental Management. Academic Press, London, 55–64.
Jeffrey, D. W., J. G. Wilson, C. R. Harris & D. L. Tomlinson, 1985. The application of two simple indices to Irish estuary pollution status. In Wilson, J. G. & W. Halcrow (eds), Estuarine Management and Quality Assessment. Plenum Press, London, 147–165.
Kay, J. J., 1984. Self Organisation in Living Systems. PhD. Thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario.
Leontieff, W., 1941. The Structure of American Economy 1919–1929: An Empirical Application of Equilibrium Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
McMahon, T. G., R. C. T. Raine, T. Fast, L. Kies & J. W. Patching, 1992. Phytoplankton biomass, light attenuation, and mixing in the Shannon estuary, Ireland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 72: 709–720.
McLusky, D. S., N. Briche, M. Desprez, S. Duhamel, H. Rybarczyck & B. Elkaim, 1991. The benthic production of the Baie de Somme, France. In Eleftheriou, A., A. Ansell & C. J. Smith (eds), The Biology and Ecology of Shallow Coastal Waters. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, 225–231.
McLusky, D. S., M. Desprez, B. Elkaim & S. Duhamel, 1994. The inner estuary of the Baie de Somme. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 38: 313–318.
Monaco, M. E. & R. E. Ulanowicz, 1997. Comparative ecosystem trophic structure of three US mid-Atlantic estuaries. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161: 239–254.
Odum, E. P., 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.
O’Higgins, T. & J. G. Wilson, 2005. Impact of the river Liffey discharge on nutrient and chlorophyll concentrations in the Liffey estuary and Dublin Bay (Irish Sea). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 64: 323–334.
Pearson, T. H. & R. Rosenberg, 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of the marine environment. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 4: 481–520.
Petersen, B. & K.-M. Exo, 1999. Predation of waders and gulls on Lanice conchilega in the Wadden Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series 178: 229–240.
Roth, S. & J. G. Wilson, 1998. Functional analysis by trophic guild of macrobenthic community structure in Dublin Bay, Ireland. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 222: 195–217.
Rybarczyk, H., B. Elkaïm, J. G. Wilson & N. Loquet, 1996. L’eutrophisation en Baie de Somme: mortalité des peuplements benthiques par anoxie. Oceanologica Acta 19: 281–286.
Rybarczyk, H., B. Elkaïm, L. Ochs & N. Loquet, 2003. Analysis of the trophic network of a macrotidal ecosystem: the Bay of Somme (Eastern Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 405–421.
Rybarczyk, H. & B. Elkaïm, 2003. An analysis of the trophic network of a macrotidal estuary: the Seine Estuary (Eastern Channel, Normandy, France). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 58: 775–791.
Schwinghammer, P., B. Hargrave, D. Peer & C. M. Hawkins, 1986. Partitioning of production and respiration among size groups of organisms in an intertidal benthic community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 31: 131–142.
Ulanowicz, R. E., 1984. Community measures of marine food networks and their possible application. In Fasham, M. J. R. (ed.), Flows of Energy and Materials in Marine Ecosystems: Theory and Practice. Plenum Press, New York, 3–22.
Ulanowicz, R. E., 1986. Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. Springer Verlag, New York.
Ulanowicz, R. E., 1997. Ecology, the Ascendant Perspective. Columbia University Press, New York.
Warwick, R. M., 1986. A new method for detecting pollution effects on marine benthic communities. Marine Biology 92: 557–562.
Warwick, R. M. & Clarke, R., 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation. 2nd edn. PRIMER-E. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK.
West, A. B., J. K. Partridge & A. B. West, 1979. The cockle Cerastoderma edule (L.) on the south Bull, Dublin Bay: population parameters and fishery potential. Irish Fisheries Investigations Series B (Marine) 20: 1–18.
Wilson, J. G., 1982. The littoral fauna of Dublin Bay. Irish Fisheries Investigations Series B (Marine) 26: 1–22.
Wilson, J. G., 1993. Climate change and the future for the cockle Cerastoderma edule in Dublin Bay-an exercise in prediction modelling. Occasional Publications of the Irish Biogeographical Society 2: 141–149.
Wilson, J. G., 2001. Long-term studies of bivalves in Dublin Bay, Ireland. Porcupine Marine Natural History Society Newsletter 7: 27–31.
Wilson, J. G., 2002. Productivity, fisheries and aquaculture in temperate estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55: 953–967.
Wilson, J. G., 2005. The intertidal system: sustainability and long-term indicators of system status. In Wilson, J. (ed.), The Intertidal Ecosystem. Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, 171–189.
Wilson, J. G., N. Allott, F. Bailey & N. Gray, 1986. A survey of the pollution status of the Liffey estuary. Irish Journal of Environmental Science 3: 15–20.
Wilson, J. G., B. Brennan & B. Rafferty, 1990. Pollution levels and the effects on the Dublin Bay ecosystem. In Chambers, P. L. & C. P. Chambers (eds), Estuarine Toxicology. Japaga, Ashford, Co. Wicklow, 63–71.
Wilson, J. G., M. Brennan & A. Murray, 2002. Particulate Inputs to Dublin Bay and to the South lagoon, Bull Island. Hydrobiologia 475/476: 195–204.
Wilson, J. G. & B. Elkaim, 1991. A comparison of the pollution status of 12 Irish and French estuaries. In Elliott, M. & J.-P. Ducrotoy (eds), Estuaries and Coasts-Spatial and Temporal Intercomparisons. Olssen & Olssen, Fredensborg, 317–322.
Wilson, J. G. & D. W. Jeffrey, 1994. Benthic biological pollution indices in estuaries. In Kramer, K. J. M. (eds), Biomonitoring of Coastal Waters and Estuaries. CRC Press, Baton Rouge, 311–327.
Wilson, J. G. & A. Parkes, 1999. Network analysis of the energy flow through the Dublin Bay ecosystem. Biology and Environment 98B: 179–190.
Wulff, F., J. Field & K. Mann, 1989. Network Analysis in Marine Ecology: Methods and Applications. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
Acknowledegments
The authors would like to thank their colleagues in the ESU for much valuable advice and discussion, the crew of the RV Celtic Voyager for assistance with sampling, and Mr. T. Cooney of the Botany Dept, TCD for permission to use his data as well as other invaluable help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, J.G., Rybarczyck, H. & Elkaim, B. A comparison of energy flow through the Dublin Bay and Baie de Somme intertidal ecosystems and their network analysis. Hydrobiologia 588, 231–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0666-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-0666-x