Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Public university governance in China and Australia: a comparative study

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are several common trends and challenges in the higher education (HE) system around the world, like expansion and diversification of HE, fiscal pressure and orientation to markets, demand for greater accountability and great quality and efficiency (e.g. The financing and management of higher education: a status report on worldwide reforms, 1998; Internationalisation of higher education and global mobility 43-58, 2014; Global policy and policy-making in education, 2014; Higher Education Policy 21:5-27, 2008). These trends and changes have reshaped university governance as well. Public universities are the main institutions to carry out HE in Australia and China. The engagement between Australia and China in HE sector has become closer and closer in recent years. To conduct better and further cooperation and collaboration between Australian and Chinese universities, it is critical to understand and acknowledge the differences in two nations’ university governance. Moreover, by conducting this comparative study of two nations, it also helps us to figure out the changes in university governance over times under the global trends and the interactions between global and local factors. This comparative study focuses on the university level and attempts to identify the differences of university governance in Australian and Chinese public universities in three dimensions, state-university relation, university internal governance and university finance. This paper sketches the university governance in Australia and China and finds that the relationship between government and university is looser in Australia than that in China and Australian universities enjoy more autonomy and power than Chinese universities; as to university internal governance, Australian universities use a more business-oriented management mechanism; funding associated with full-fee paying international students has become very important for Australian HE while Chinese government funding has been decreasing as well but funds from international students play a minimal financial role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, T., Banks, M., & Olsen, A. (2011). International education in Australia: From aid to trade to internationalization.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti, T., & Catalano, G. (2006). Governance models of university systems—towards quasi-markets? Tendencies and perspectives: a European comparison. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(3), 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., Gumport, P. J., & Berdahl, R. O. (2011). American higher education in the twenty-first century: social, political, and economic challenges: JHU Press.

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. A., & Karseth, B. (2002). Governing higher education: comparing national perspectives. In Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 279-298): Springer.

  • Austin, I., & Jones, G. A. (2015). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australia Universities. (2009). The nature of international education in Australian universities and its benefits. Strategy Policy and Research in Education Limited.

  • Bok, D. (2009). Universities in the marketplace: the commercialization of higher education: Princeton University Press.

  • Braun, D., & Merrien, F. (1999). Towards a model of governance for universities. Comparative view. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. (2000). Financing higher education: patterns, trends and options. Prospects, 30(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Council. (2013). A brief overview of Chinese higher education system. India: British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capano, G. (2011). Government continues to do its job. A comparative study of governance shifts in the higher education sector. Public Administration, 89(4), 1622–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D., & Mok, K.-H. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation: a comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland. Comparative Education, 37(1), 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. (2011). University governance reforms: potential problems of more autonomy? Higher Education, 62(4), 503–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective: Univ of California Press.

  • Currie, J. (2003). Globalizing practices and university responses: European and Anglo-American differences: Greenwood Publishing Group.

  • Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., & Merry, S. E. (2012). Indicators as a technology of global governance. Law & Society Review, 46(1), 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, J. S. (1987). Higher education: a policy discussion paper: Australian Government Publishing Service.

  • Dawkins, J. (1988). Higher education: a policy statement: Australian Government Publishing Service.

  • Dobbins, M., Knill, C., & Vögtle, E. M. (2011). An analytical framework for the cross-country comparison of higher education governance. Higher Education, 62(5), 665–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L. C. J., & Van Vught, F. (1994). Comparative policy studies in higher education (Vol. 19): Lemma.

  • Henry, E., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A‘triple helix’of university-industry government relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, F. (2003). Policy and practice of the internationalization of higher education in China. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(3), 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, D. B., Arora, A., & Experton, W. (1998). The financing and management of higher education: a status report on worldwide reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jokila, S. (2015). The internationalization of higher education with Chinese characteristics: Appadurai’s ideas explored. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35(1), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (2014). Three generations of crossborder higher education: new developments, issues and challenges. Internationalisation of higher education and global mobility, 43-58.

  • Lazzeretti, L., & Tavoletti, E. (2006). Governance shifts in higher education: a cross-national comparison. European Educational Research Journal, 5(1), 18–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., & Yang, R. (2014). Governance reforms in higher education: a study of China. In: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). http://unesdoc. unesco. org/images/0023/002318/231858e. pdf. Accessed.

  • Lingard, B., Martino, W., Rezai-Rashti, G., & Sellar, S. (2015). Globalizing educational accountabilities: Routledge.

  • Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia: Cambridge University Press.

  • Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education: Allen & Unwin Sydney.

  • Marginson, S. (2002). Nation-building universities in a global environment: the case of Australia. Higher Education, 43(3), 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2004). National and global competition in higher education. The Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2014). The global construction of higher education reform. forthcoming Global policy and policy-making in education. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2016). The global construction of higher education reform. Handbook of Global Education Policy, 291.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzarol, T., & Hosie, P. (1996). Exporting Australian higher education: future strategies in a maturing market. Quality Assurance in Education, 4(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, O. C. (1996). The paradigms of governance in higher education systems. Higher Education Policy, 9(2), 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNay, I. (1999). Changing cultures in UK higher education: the state as corporate market bureaucracy and the emergent academic enterprise. Towards a new model of governance for universities, 34-58.

  • Meek, V. L. (2002). On the road to mediocrity? Governance and management of Australian higher education in the market place. In Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 235-260): Springer.

  • Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: the emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K.-H. (2003). Similar trends, diverse agendas: higher education reforms in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1(2), 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (2005). Globalization and educational restructuring: university merging and changing governance in China. Higher Education, 50(1), 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H., & Lo, Y. W. (2007). The impacts of neo-liberalism on China’s higher education. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(1), 316–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordorika, I. (2003). The limits of university autonomy: power and politics at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Higher Education, 46(3), 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rottenburg, R., Merry, S. E., Park, S.-J., & Mugler, J. (2015). The world of indicators: the making of governmental knowledge through quantification: Cambridge University Press.

  • Rytmeister, C. (2009). Governing university strategy: perceptions and practice of governance and management roles. Tertiary Education and Management, 15(2), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, P., Tremblay, K., Basri, E., & Arnal, E. (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society (Vol. 1): OECD Paris.

  • Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2006). Strength in numbers-the advantages of multiple rankings. Ind. LJ, 81, 205.

  • Serger, S. S., Benner, M., & Liu, L. (2015). Chinese university governance: tensions and reforms. Science & Public Policy (SPP), 42(6).

  • Sheridan, G. (1995). Living with dragons: Australia confronts its Asian destiny. Sydney Papers, The, 7(3), 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D., & Yolcu, H. (2013). Neo-liberal educational reforms: a critical analysis (Vol. 107): Routledge.

  • Universities Australia. (2013). A smarter Australia: an agenda for Australian higher education 2013–2016. Canberra.

  • Universities Australia. (2017). Australia’s education exports at record high.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. A. (1989). Governmental strategies and innovation in higher education. Higher education policies series, 7: ERIC.

  • Yang, R. (2002). Third delight: the internationalization of higher education in China: Psychology Press.

  • Yang, R., Vidovich, L., & Currie, J. (2007). “Dancing in a cage”: changing autonomy in Chinese higher education. Higher Education, 54(4), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 马建雯. (2008). 建国后我国重点大学招生地方化问题的研究. 厦门大学, Doctoral dissertation.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia

    Min Hong

Authors
  1. Min Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, M. Public university governance in China and Australia: a comparative study. High Educ 76, 717–733 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0234-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0234-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation