Skip to main content
Log in

Medical Professionalism, Revenue Enhancement, and Self-Interest: An Ethically Ambiguous Association

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores the association between medical professionalism, revenue enhancement, and self-interest. Utilizing the sociological literature, I begin by characterizing professionalism generally and medical professionalism particularly. I then consider “pay for performance” mechanisms as an example of one way physicians might be incentivized to improve their professionalism and, at the same time, enhance their revenue. I suggest that the concern discussed in much of the medical professionalism literature that physicians might act on the basis of self-interest is over-generalized, and that instead we ought to argue about ways to distinguish permissible and impermissible self-interested actions. Also, I argue that financial incentives for medical professionals ought to be permissible but considered as “by-products” of doing what physicians are expected to do as professionals in any case. Nevertheless, I conclude that, even if a positive association between increasing professionalism and revenue enhancement can be established, in the long term it may not be an unambiguous good for physicians as professionals in that this association may tend to reduce their professional discretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I leave aside here the important empirical question about the truth of such claims and, as well, the counter-claims that members of the other types of medical professionalism could conceivably make against them. My concern is only to highlight the fact that such claims can be argued on the basis of a consistent set of professionally and ethically grounded values.

  2. To be fair to these authors, they acknowledge how the term “altruism” is interpreted variously in the medical professionalism literature.

  3. I take it as given that professional and personal values should “trump” morally impermissible self-interest.

  4. What pay for performance mechanisms will probably not do is increase access, unless the costs saved are redirected to this end.

References

  • Arnold, L., & Stern, D. T. (2006). That is medical professionalism? In D. T. Stern (Ed.), Measuring medical professionalism (pp. 15–37). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, H. (2009). The future of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. W. (2006). The complexities of medical professionalism: a preliminary investigation. In D. Wear & J. M. Aultman (Eds.), Professionalism in medicine: critical perspectives (pp. 3–23). New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism, the third logic: on the practice of knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafferty, F. (2004). Toward the operationalization of professionalism: a commentary. The American Journal of Bioethics, 4(2), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, M. (2008). Pay for performance and medical professionalism. Quality Management in Health care, 17(1), 9–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maister, D. H. (1997). True professionalism: the courage to care about your people, your clients, and your career. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martimianakis, M., Maniate, J., & Hodges, B. (2009). Sociological interpretations of professionalism. Medical Education, 43, 829–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaseem, A., et al. (2010). Pay for performance through the lens of medical professionalism. Annals of Internal Medicine, 152, 366–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H. (2008). Internal and external goods: a philosophical critique of the hybridization of professionalism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(7), 634–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. R. (2009). Quality and safety initiatives in the future practice of surgery: meeting patient demands for enhanced professionalism. Surgery Today, 39, 739–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan C. Heller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heller, J.C. Medical Professionalism, Revenue Enhancement, and Self-Interest: An Ethically Ambiguous Association. HEC Forum 24, 307–315 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9198-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9198-5

Keywords

Navigation