Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geographical patterns of turnover and nestedness-resultant components of allelic diversity among populations

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of geographical patterns in population divergence has always been a powerful way to infer microevolutionary processes involved in population differentiation, and several approaches have been used to investigate such patterns. Most frequently, multivariate spatial patterns of population differentiation are analyzed by computing pairwise genetic distances or FST (or related statistics, such as ϕST from AMOVA), which are then correlated with geographical distances or landscape features. However, when calculating distances, especially based on presence-absence of alleles in local populations, there would be a confounding effect of allelic richness differences in the population differentiation. Moreover, the relative magnitude of these components and their spatial patterns can help identifying microevolutionary processes driving population differentiation. Here we show how recent methodological advances in ecological community analyses that allows partitioning dissimilarity into turnover (turnover) and richness differences, or nestedness-resultant dissimilarity, can be applied to allelic variation data, using an endemic Cerrado tree (Dipteryx alata) as a case study. Individuals from 15 local populations were genotyped for eight microsatellite loci, and pairwise dissimilarities were computed based on presence-absence of alleles. The turnover of alleles among populations represented 69 % of variation in dissimilarity, but only the richness difference component shows a clear spatial structure, appearing as a westward decrease of allelic richness. We show that decoupling richness difference and turnover components of allelic variation reveals more clearly how similarity among populations reflects geographical patterns in allelic diversity that can be interpreted in respect to historical range expansion in the species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida-Neto M, Guimarães P, Guimarães-Jr PR, Loyola RD, Ulrich W (2008) A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and quantification. Oikos 117:1227–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida-Neto M, Frensel DMB, Ulrich W (2012) Rethinking the relationship between nestedness and betadiversity: a comment on Baselga (2010). Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(7):772–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbujani G (1987) Autocorrelation of gene frequencies under isolation-by-distance. Genetics 177:772–782

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2010) Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga A (2012) The relationship between species replacement, dissimilarity derived from nestedness, and nestedness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21 (in press)

  • Borcard D, Legendre P (2012) Is the mantel correlogram powerful enough to be useful in ecological analysis? A simulation study. Ecology 93:1473–1481

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabarello A, Rodriguez-Ramilo ST (2010) A new method for the partition of allelic diversity within and between subpopulations. Conserv Genet 11:2219–2229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Gomes P (2012) Determining the relative roles of species replacement and species richness differences in generating beta-diversity patterns. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(7):760–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza L, Menozzi P, Piazza A (1994) The history and geography of human genes. Princeton University press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Collevatti RG, Lima JS, Soares TN, Telles MPC (2010) Spatial genetic structure and life-history traits in Cerrado tree species: inferences for conservation. Nat Conserv 8:54–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2011) Geographical patterns in biodiversity: towards an integration of concepts and methods from genes to species diversity. Nat Conserv 9:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Nabout JC, Telles MPC, Soares TN, Rangel TFLVB (2009) A review of techniques for spatial modeling in geographical, conservation and landscape genetics. Genet Mol Biol 32:203–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Melo DB, Oliveira G, Collevatti RG, Soares TN, Nabout JC, Lima JS, Dobrovolski R, Chaves LJ, Naves RV, Loyola RD, Telles MPC (2012a) Planning for optimal conservation of geographical genetic variability within species. Conserv Genet 13:1085–1093

  • Diniz-Filho JAF, Siqueira T, Padial AA, Rangel TF, Landeiro VL, Bini LM (2012b) Spatial autocorrelation analysis allows disentangling the balance between neutral and niche processes in metacommunities. Oikos 121:201–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovolski R, Melo AS, Cassemiro FAZ, Diniz-Filho JAF (2012) Climatic history and dispersal ability explain the relative importance of turnover and nestedness components of beta-diversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modeling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbor matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK (1995) Spatial distribution of genotypes under isolation by distance. Genetics 140:1431–1440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK (1996) Measurement of genetic structure within populations using Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation statistics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10528–10532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Epperson BK (2003) Geographical genetics. Princeton University press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Ray N (2008) Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. Trends Ecol Evol 23:347–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Excoffier L, Foll M, Petit RJ (2009) Genetic consequences of range expansion. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:481–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (2004) Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Peres-Neto P (2006) Spatial modeling in ecology: the flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. Ecology 87:2603–2613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (1999) Isolation by distance in a continuous population: reconciliation between spatial autocorrelation analysis and population genetics models. Genetics 83:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger KE, Weir BS (2009) Genetics in geographically structured populations: defining, estimating and interpreting FST. Nat Rev Genet 10:639–650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1985) The statistics of natural selection. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manly BFJ (1997) Randomization, bootstrap, and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogués-Bravo D (2009) Predicting the past distribution of species climatic niches. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 18:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden N, Sokal RR (1986) Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. Syst Zool 35:608–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2006) Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macroecology and biogeography. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel TFLVB, Diniz-Filho JAF, Bini LM (2010) SAM:a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in macroecology. Ecography 33:46–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation-by-distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F (2004) Genetic structure and selection in subdivided population. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Smouse PE, Peakall R (1999) Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure. Heredity 82:561–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares TN, Chaves LJ, Telles MPC, Diniz-Filho JAF, Resende LV (2008) Landscape conservation genetics of Dipteryx alata (‘‘baru’’ tree: Fabaceae) from Cerrado region of central Brazil. Genetica 132:9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soares TN, Melo DB, Resende LV, Vianello RP, Chaves LJ, Collevatti RG, Telles MPC (2012) Development of microsatellite markers for the Neotropical tree species Dipteryx alata (Fabacea). Am J Bot 99:e72–e73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soininen J, MacDonald R, Hillebrand H (2007) The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities. Ecography 30:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR (1979) Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. Syst Zool 28:227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Oden NL (1978a) Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biol J Linn Soc 10:199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Oden NL (1978b) Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 2. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biol J Linn Soc 10:229–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Wartenberg DE (1983) A test of spatial autocorrelation analysis using an isolation-by-distance model. Genetics 105:219–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Smouse P, Neel JV (1986) The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama indians. XV. Patterns inferred by autocorrelation analysis. Genetics 114:259–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Oden NL, Wilson C (1991) Genetic evidence for the spread of agriculture in Europe by demic diffusion. Nature 351:143–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Oden N, Thomson BA (1997) A simulation study of microevolutionary inferences by spatial autocorrelation analysis. Biol J Linn Soc 60:73–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vekemans X, Hardy OJ (2004) New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol Ecol 13:921–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrés Baselga and one anonymous reviewers for suggestions that improved the original manuscript. Our research program integrating macroecology and molecular ecology of plants has been continuously supported by several grants and fellowships to the research network GENPAC (Geographical Genetics and Regional Planning for natural resources in Brazilian Cerrado) from CNPq/MCT/CAPES (projects # 564717/2010-0 and 563624/2010-8) and by the “Núcleo de Excelência em Genética e Conservação de Espécies do Cerrado”—GECER (PRONEX/FAPEG/CNPq CP 07-2009). Field work has been supported by Systema Naturae Consultoria Ambiental LTDA. Work by J.A.F.D.-F., M.P.C.T. and R.G.C. has been continuously supported by productivity fellowships from CNPq.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Collevatti, R.G., Soares, T.N. et al. Geographical patterns of turnover and nestedness-resultant components of allelic diversity among populations. Genetica 140, 189–195 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-012-9670-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-012-9670-9

Keywords

Navigation