Skip to main content
Log in

Peak Friction Angle of Soils as a Function of Grain Size

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have attempted to correlate geotechnical properties and to produce semi-empirical methods for estimating geotechnical parameters when sufficient field or laboratory measurements are not available. In the case of Greek soil formations, several studies have been presented that relate in situ tests (standard penetration test, cross-hole, seismocone) and laboratory tests for cohesive soils. Statistical analysis of the data resulted in the formulation of empirical correlations between various soil parameters, often with reasonably high correlation coefficients. However, these relationships refer mainly to cohesive soils, because the majority of tests were carried out in such formations. In this paper, the correlation of the particle size and the peak friction angle for a wide range of Greek soil formations is investigated. A simple, but rational approach for estimating the friction angle is presented, which allows prediction of the shear strength of soil formations. Since this investigation covered a wide range of soils and the number of test results is significant, the obtained empirical correlations can be considered as reliable for Greek soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez Grima M, Babuska R (1999) Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ameratunga J, Sivakugan N, Das BM (2016) Correlations of soil and rock properties in geotechnical Engineering. Springer. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering. Das BM (ed), Henderson; Nagaratnam S (ed), Townsville. ISBN 978-81-322-2627-7 ISBN 978-81-322-2629-1 (eBook). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2629-1

  • Amorosi A, Rampello S (2007) An experimental investigation into the mechanical behaviour of a structured stiff clay. Géotechnique 57(2):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos A (1974) Evaluation of the undrained shear strength from static cone penetration test in a soft silty clay in Patras, Greece. Proc Eur Symp Penetr Test Stockh 2(2):13–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos A, Koukis G, Sabatakakis N, Tsiambaos G (2003) Empirical correlations of soil parameters based on cone penetration tests (CPT) for Greek soils. Geotech Geol Eng 21:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D2487 (2004) Standard test method for classification of soils for engineering purposes. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM D6528-07 (2007) Standard test method for consolidated undrained direct simple shear testing of cohesive soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Bjerrum L, Simons NE (1960) Comparison of shear strength characteristics of normally consolidated clays. Proc ASCE Res Conf Shear Strength Cohesive Soils. Boulder, Colorado, pp 711–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouckovalas G, Kalteziotis N, Sabatakakis N, Zervogiannis H (1989) Shear wave velocity in a very soft clay–measurements and correlations. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Rio de Janeiro, 13–18 August, pp 191–194

  • Boylan N, Long M (2009) Development of a direct simple shear apparatus for peat soils. ASTM Geotech Test J 32(2):126–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker EW, Ireland HO (1965) Earth pressure at rest related to stress history. Can Geotech J 2(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS 8002 (1994) Code of practice for earth retaining structures. British Standards Institution, London

  • Chang WJ, Phantachang T (2016) Effects of gravel content on shear resistance of gravelly soils. Eng Geol 207:78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini C, Orr TLL (2000) A rational procedure for comparing measured and calculated values in geotechnics. In: Yokohama IS, Nakase A, Tsuchida T (eds). Proceedings of the international symposium on coastal geotechnical engineering in practice, vol 1. AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 261–265

  • Dithinde M, Phoon KK, Ching J, Zhang LM and Retief JV (2016) Statistical characterisation of model uncertainty. Chapter 5, Reliability of geotechnical structures in ISO2394. CRC Press, Leiden

  • Finol J, Guo YK, Jing XD (2001) A rule based fuzzy model for the prediction of petrophysical rock parameters. J Pet Sci Eng 29(2):97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzblau A (1958) A primer for statistics for non-statistician. Harcourt Brace & World, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney TC (1959) “Discussion of geotechnical properties of glacial lake clays,” by T.H. Wu. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 85(SM3): 67–79

  • Koukis G, Tsiambaos G and Sabatakakis N (1997) Correlations of mechanical characteristics and classification of soil units of Patras city. In: Proceedings of 3rd Hellenic congress in geotechnical Engin., Patras, pp. 121–127 (in Greek)

  • Kulhawy FH and Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design, Report EL-6800, Research Project No. 1493-6, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto

  • Lagioia R, Nova R (1995) An experimental and theoretical study of the behaviour of a calcarenite in triaxial compression. Géotechnique 45(4):633–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyejekwe S, Kang X, Ge L (2015) Assessment of empirical equations for the compression index of fine-grained soils in Missouri. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(3):705–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr TLL, Cherubini C (2003) Use of the ranking distance a san index for assuming the accuracy and precision of the equations for the bearing capacity of piles and at-rest earth pressure coefficient. Can Geotech J 40(6):1200–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer M, Isik NS, Orhan M (2008) Statistical and neural network assessment of the compression index of clay-bearing soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salgado R (2008) The engineering of foundation. McGraw Hill, New York, p 882

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann JH (1978) Guidelines for cone penetration test performance and design, Report FHWA-TS-78-209. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., p 145

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PR, Jardine RJ, Hight DW (1992) The yielding of Bothkennar clay. Géotechnique 42(2):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen KK, Okkels N (2013) Correlation between drained shear strength and plasticity index of undisturbed overconsolidated clays. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, vol. 1, Paris, Presses des Ponts, pp. 423–428

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zein AKM (2017) Estimation of undrained shear strength of fine grained soils from cone penetration resistance. Geo-Engineering 8:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0046-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zervogiannis H, Bouckovalas G, Christoulas St (1987) Correlation of mechanical characteristics and classification of soil deposits. Bulletin of Central Public Works Laboratory, vol. 4, pp. 255–265 (in Greek)

  • Zervogiannis H, Kalteziotis N (1988) Experience and relationships from penetration testing in Greece. In: Proceedings of 1st international symposium on penetration testing, ISOPT-1, vol. 2, Orlando, 1063–1071

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Steiakakis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arvanitidis, C., Steiakakis, E. & Agioutantis, Z. Peak Friction Angle of Soils as a Function of Grain Size. Geotech Geol Eng 37, 1155–1167 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0675-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0675-8

Keywords

Navigation