Skip to main content
Log in

A discrete nonlocal formulation using local constitutive laws

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nonlocality is discussed in differential and discrete formulations. When modeling heterogeneous materials, a length scale must be introduced into the material description of the differential formulation. This happens since metrics is lost in performing the limit process. Avoiding the limit process, that is, using a discrete formulation, the length scale is intrinsically taken into account. Moreover, nonlocality seems to characterize global variables rather than material. This made it possible to move the length scale from constitutive to governing equations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bažant, Z. P., and Chang, T. P. (1984). Is Strain-Softening Mathematically Admissible? Proc., 5th Engineering Mechanics Division 2, 1377–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bažant, Z. P., and Jirásek, M. (2002). Nonlocal Integral Formulations of Plasticity and Damage: Survey of Progress. J. Eng. Mech. 128(11), 1119–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eringen, A. C. (1966). A Unified Theory of Thermomechanical Materials. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 4, 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, R. T. (1996). Finite Element Methods for Engineers. Imperial College Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, E. (2003). Crack Propagation Modeling by Remeshing using the Cell Method (CM). CMES, 4(1), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, E. (2004). Experimental Procedure for Verifying Strain-Softening in Concrete. International Journal of Fracture (Letters section) 126(2), L27–L3

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallen, E. (1962). Electromagnetic Theory, Chapman & Hall.

  • Huebner, K. H. (1975). The Finite Element Method for Engineers. Wiley.

  • Kröner, E. (1968). Elasticity Theory of Materials with Long-Range Cohesive Forces. Int. J. Solids Struct. 3, 731–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumhansl, J. A. (1965). Generalized Continuum Field Representation for Lattice Vibrations. In Lattice Dynamics, R. K. Wallis ed., Pergamon, London, 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin, I. A. (1966). Theory of Elasticity with Spatial Dispersion, Prikl. Mat. Mekh. (in Russian) 30, 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Livesley, R. K. (1983). Finite Elements, an Introduction for Engineers. Cambridge University Press.

  • Penfield, P., and Haus, H. (1967). Electrodynamics of Moving Media, M.I.T. Press.

  • Rogula, D. (1965). Influence of Spatial Acoustic Dispersion on Dynamical Properties of Dislocations. I. Bulletin de l’Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Séries des Sciences Techniques 13, 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonti, E. (1972). On the Mathematical Structure of a Large Class of Physical Theories. Rend. Acc. Lincei 52, 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonti, E. (2001). “A Direct Discrete Formulation of Field Laws: the Cell Method.” CMES, 2(2), 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferretti, E. A discrete nonlocal formulation using local constitutive laws. Int J Fract 130, L175–L182 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-004-2588-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-004-2588-1

Keywords

Navigation