Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of Timber Connections Exposed to Fire: A Review

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire safety has always been a major concern in the design of timber construction. Even though wood is a highly combustible material, timber members can perform adequately under elevated temperatures. The thermal response of timber connections, however, is in most cases poor and determination of their fire resistance is usually the crucial factor in evaluating the overall load-bearing capacity of wood structures exposed to fire. The analysis of timber joints under fire conditions can be challenging due to their complexity and variety. After presenting the variation of the properties of timber with temperature, this paper reviews the fire performance of various connection types, such as bolted or nailed wood-to-wood and steel-to-timber joints. Results from relevant experimental programs and numerical studies are discussed in detail and future research needs are highlighted. The effect of several factors on the fire resistance of timber connections, such as the fastener diameter, timber thickness and joint geometry, is investigated and useful conclusions are drawn. Based on these, preliminary guidelines for the efficient design of timber connections under fire exposure are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO 834-1 (1999) Fire-resistance tests—elements of building construction—part 1: general requirements. ISO, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  2. CAN/ULC-S101-07 (2007) Standard methods for fire endurance tests of building construction and materials. Laboratories of Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mehaffey JR, Cuerrier P, Carisse G (1994) A model for predicting heat transfer through gypsum board/wood stud walls exposed to fire. Fire Mater 18:297–305. doi:10.1002/fam.810180505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Janssens ML (1994) Thermo-physical properties for wood pyrolysis models. In: Pacific timber engineering conference, Gold Coast, Australia

  5. Knudson RM (1973) Performance of structural wood members exposed to fire. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, USA

  6. Fredlund B (1993) Modelling of heat and mass transfer in timber structures during fire. Fire Saf J 20:39–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Konig J, Walleij L (2000) Timber frame assemblies exposed to standard and parametric fires, part 2: a design model for standard fire exposure. Rapport I 0001001. Swedish Institute for Wood Technology Research, Stockholm

  8. Lie TT (1992) Structural fire protection. ASCE manuals and reports of engineering practice, no. 78. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York

  9. Takeda H, Mehaffey JR (1998) WALL2D: a model for predicting heat transfer through wood-stud walls exposed to fire. Fire Mater 22:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. EN 1995-1-2 (2009) Eurocode 5—design of timber structures part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peng L, Hadjisophocleous G, Mehaffey J, Mohammad M (2011) Predicting the fire resistance of wood–steel–wood connections. Fire Technol 47:1101–1119. doi:10.1007/s10694-009-0118-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. EN 1993-1-2 (2005) Eurocode 3—design of steel structures part 1–2: general rules—structural fire design. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erchinger C, Frangi A, Fontana M (2010) Fire design of steel-to-timber dowelled connections. Eng Struct 32:580–589. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buchanan AH (2001) Structural design for fire safety. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peng L, Hadjisophocleous G, Mehaffey J, Mohammad M (2012) Fire performance of timber connections, part 1: fire resistance tests on bolted wood–steel–wood and steel–wood–steel connections. J Struct Fire Eng 3(2):107–131. doi:10.1260/2040-2317.3.2.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lau PH (2006) Fire resistance of connections in laminated veneer lumber (LVL). MEFE thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury

  17. Chuo TCB (2007) Fire performance of connections in laminated veneer lumber. MEFE thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury

  18. Dhima D (1999) Verification expérimentale de la résistance au feu des assemblages d’ éléments en bois. CTICM Ref. INC-99/399-DD/NB, CTICM, Paris, France

  19. Laplanche K (2006) Etude du comportement au feu des assemblages de structures bois: Approche expérimentale et modélisation. Thèse doctorale, Université Blaise Pascal – Clermont II

  20. Peng L, Hadjisophocleous G, Mehaffey J, Mohammad M (2010) Fire resistance of wood–steel–wood connections. In: Sixth international conference on structures in fire, East Lansing, USA, June 2–4, 2010

  21. Ayme N (2003) Assemblages bois-métal en double cisaillement. Rapport Du Comportement Au Feu D’ Assemblages Bois, CTICM Ref.SR21-03/121-NA/PB, CTICM, Paris, France

  22. Peng L, Hadjisophocleous G, Mehaffey J, Mohammad M (2010) Fire resistance performance of unprotected wood–wood–wood and wood–steel–wood connections: a literature review and new data correlations. Fire Saf J 45:392–399. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. König J (2005) Structural fire design according to Eurocode 5—design rules and their background. Fire Mater 29:147–163. doi:10.1002/fam.873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. König J (2005) Structural fire design of timber structures according to Eurocode 5. Fire Saf Sci 8:303–313. doi:10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.8-303

    Google Scholar 

  25. Austruy C (2007) Fire resistance of timber connections. http://perso.crans.org/austruy/rapport%20latex/rapportlatex.pdf. Assessed on 7 June 2013.

  26. EN 1995-1-1 (2006) Eurocode 5: design of timber structures—part 1-1: general—common rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dias de Moraes P, Rodrigues JPC, Correia NDF (2012) Behavior of bolted timber joints subjected to high temperature. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 70:225–232. doi:10.1007/s00107-011-0539-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moss PJ, Nilsen TM, Fragiacomo M, Buchanan AH (2010) Fire resistance of connections in timber structures. In: Sixth international conference on structures in fire, East Lansing, USA, June 2–4, 2010

  29. Correia ND, Rodrigues JPC, Moraes PD (2010) Timber bolted joints subjected to high temperatures. In: Sixth international conference on structures in fire, East Lansing, USA, June 2–4, 2010

  30. Manriquez MJ (2008) Influence of the temperature on the mechanical resistance of the Pariacá. MSc thesis, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopólis, Brazil

  31. Noren J (1996) Load-bearing capacity of nailed joints exposed to fire. Fire Mater 20:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moss PJ, Buchanan AH, Fragiacomo M, Austruy C (2010) Experimental testing and analytical prediction of the behavior of timber bolted connections subjected to fire. Fire Technol 46:129–148. doi:10.1007/s10694-009-0096-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. EN 1194:1999 (1999) Timber structures—glued laminated timber—strength classes and determination of characteristic values. CEN, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  34. Standards New Zealand NZS 3603:1993 (1993) Timber structures standard. SNZ, Wellington

  35. CAN/CSA-O86-09 (2009) Engineering design in wood. Canadian Standards Association, Rexdale

    Google Scholar 

  36. Racher P, Laplanche K, Dhima D, Bouchaïr A (2010) Thermo-mechanical analysis of the fire performance of dowelled timber connection. Eng Struct 32:1148–1157. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cachim PB, Franssen JM (2009) Numerical modeling of timber connections under fire loading using a component model. Fire Saf J 44:840–853. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Frangi A, Erchinger C, Fontana M (2010) Experimental fire analysis of steel-to-timber connections using dowels and nails. Fire Mater 34:1–19. doi:10.1002/fam.994

    Google Scholar 

  39. Audebert M, Dhima D, Taazount M, Bouchaïr A (2011) Numerical investigations on the thermo-mechanical behavior of steel-to-timber joints exposed to fire. Eng Struct 33:3257–3268. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Audebert M, Dhima D, Taazount M, Bouchaïr A (2012) Behavior of dowelled and bolted steel-to-timber connections exposed to fire. Eng Struct 39:116–125. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Peng L, Hadjisophocleous G, Mehaffey J, Mohammad M (2012) Fire performance of timber connections, part 2: thermal and structural modelling. J Struct Fire Eng 3(2):133–153. doi:10.1260/2040-2317.3.2.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Erchinger C, Frangi A, Mischler A (2006) Thermal investigations on multiple shear steel-to-timber connections. In: WTCE 2006 9th world conference on timber engineering, Portland, OR, USA, August 6–10, 2006

  43. Buchanan AH, King AH (1991) Fire performance of gusset connections in glue-laminated timber. Fire Mater 15:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Maraveas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maraveas, C., Miamis, K. & Matthaiou, C.E. Performance of Timber Connections Exposed to Fire: A Review. Fire Technol 51, 1401–1432 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0369-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0369-y

Keywords

Navigation